IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? The Search For Extra-terrestrial Intelligence - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 09 Academic Reading Test 1 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 on the following pages.
IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? The Search for Extra-terrestrial Intelligence
The question of whether we are alone in the Universe has haunted humanity for centuries, but we may now stand poised on the brink of the answer to that question, as we search for radio signals from other intelligent civilisations. This search, often known by the acronym SETI (search for extra-terrestrial intelligence), is a difficult one. Although groups around the world have been searching intermittently for three decades, it is only now that we have reached the level of technology where we can make a determined attempt to search all nearby stars for any sign of life.
A The primary reason for the search is basic curiosity – the same curiosity about the natural world that drives all pure science. We want to know whether we are alone in the Universe. We want to know whether life evolves naturally if given the right conditions, or whether there is something very special about the Earth to have fostered the variety of life forms that we see around us on the planet. The simple detection of a radio signal will be sufficient to answer this most basic of all questions. In this sense, SETI is another cog in the machinery of pure science which is continually pushing out the horizon of our knowledge. However, there are other reasons for being interested in whether life exists elsewhere. For example, we have had civilisation on Earth for perhaps only a few thousand years, and the threats of nuclear war and pollution over the last few decades have told us that our survival may be tenuous. Will we last another two thousand years or will we wipe ourselves out? Since the lifetime of a planet like ours is several billion years, we can expect that, if other civilisations do survive in our galaxy, their ages will range from zero to several billion years. Thus any other civilisation that we hear from is likely to be far older, on average, than ourselves. The mere existence of such a civilisation will tell us that long-term survival is possible, and gives us some cause for optimism. It is even possible that the older civilisation may pass on the benefits of their experience in dealing with threats to survival such as nuclear war and global pollution, and other threats that we haven't yet discovered.
B In discussing whether we are alone, most SETI scientists adopt two ground rules. First, UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) are generally ignored since most scientists don't consider the evidence for them to be strong enough to bear serious consideration (although it is also important to keep an open mind in case any really convincing evidence emerges in the future). Second, we make a very conservative assumption that we are looking for a life form that is pretty well like us, since if it differs radically from us we may well not recognise it as a life form, quite apart from whether we are able to communicate with it. In other words, the life form we are looking for may well have two green heads and seven fingers, but it will nevertheless resemble us in that it should communicate with its fellows, be interested in the Universe, live on a planet orbiting a star like our Sun, and perhaps most restrictively, have a chemistry, like us, based on carbon and water.
C Even when we make these assumptions, our understanding of other life forms is still severely limited. We do not even know, for example, how many stars have planets, and we certainly do not know how likely it is that life will arise naturally, given the right conditions. However, when we look at the 100 billion stars in our galaxy (the Milky Way), and 100 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, it seems inconceivable that at least one of these planets does not have a life form on it; in fact, the best educated guess we can make, using the little that we do know about the conditions for carbon-based life, leads us to estimate that perhaps one in 100,000 stars might have a life-bearing planet orbiting it. That means that our nearest neighbours are perhaps 100 light years away, which is almost next door in astronomical terms.
D An alien civilisation could choose many different ways of sending information across the galaxy, but many of these either require too much energy, or else are severely attenuated while traversing the vast distances across the galaxy. It turns out that, for a given amount of transmitted power, radio waves in the frequency range 1000 to 3000 MHz travel the greatest distance, and so all searches to date have concentrated on looking for radio waves in this frequency range. So far there have been a number of searches by various groups around the world, including Australian searches using the radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales. Until now there have not been any detections from the few hundred stars which have been searched. The scale of the searches has been increased dramatically since 1992, when the US Congress voted NASA $10 million per year for ten years to conduct a thorough search for extra-terrestrial life. Much of the money in this project is being spent on developing the special hardware needed to search many frequencies at once. The project has two parts. One part is a targeted search using the world's largest radio telescopes, the American-operated telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico and the French telescope in Nancy in France. This part of the project is searching the nearest 1000 likely stars with high sensitivity for signals in the frequency range 1000 to 3000 MHz. The other part of the project is an undirected search which is monitoring all of space with a lower sensitivity, using the smaller antennas of NASA's Deep Space Network.
E There is considerable debate over how we should react if we detect a signal from an alien civilisation. Everybody agrees that we should not reply immediately. Quite apart from the impracticality of sending a reply over such large distances at short notice, it raises a host of ethical questions that would have to be addressed by the global community before any reply could be sent. Would the human race face the culture shock if faced with a superior and much older civilisation? Luckily, there is no urgency about this. The stars being searched are hundreds of light years away, so it takes hundreds of years for their signal to reach us, and a further few hundred years for our reply to reach them. It's not important, then, if there's a delay of a few years, or decades, while the human race debates the question of whether to reply, and perhaps carefully drafts a reply.
Questions
Questions 14–17 Matching Headings
Reading Passage 2 has five paragraphs, A-E.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B-E from the list of headings below.
i. Seeking the transmission of radio signals from planets
ii. Appropriate responses to signals from other civilisations
iii. Vast distances to Earth's closest neighbours
iv. Assumptions underlying the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence
v. Reasons for the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence
vi. Knowledge of extra-terrestrial life forms
vii. Likelihood of life on other planets
Questions 18–20 Short Answers
Answer the questions below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage for each answer.
Questions 21–26 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 2?
Write
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | iv | In discussing whether we are alone, most SETI scientists adopt two ground rules. First, UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) are generally ignored since most scientists don't consider the evidence for them to be strong enough to bear serious consideration (although it is also important to keep an open mind in case any really convincing evidence emerges in the future). Second, we make a very conservative assumption that we are looking for a life form that is pretty well like us, since if it differs radically from us we may well not recognise it as a life form, quite apart from whether we are able to communicate with it | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that researchers follow two main rules: they ignore UFO stories because the proof is weak, and they assume aliens will behave and live in ways similar to humans so that we can actually recognize them. Answer Explanation: The answer 'iv' refers to the basic ideas and rules that scientists use as a starting point when looking for life from other planets. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'iv' because Paragraph B describes the "ground rules" or "assumptions" that scientists follow. An assumption is something you think is true before you start a task. The paragraph explains that scientists assume they should ignore UFOs for now and that they should look for life that is similar to humans, which helps focus their search. |
| Q15 | vii | However, when we look at the 100 billion stars in our galaxy (the Milky Way), and 100 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, it seems inconceivable that at least one of these planets does not have a life form on it; in fact, the best educated guess we can make, using the little that we do know about the conditions for carbon-based life, leads us to estimate that perhaps one in 100,000 stars might have a life-bearing planet orbiting it | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that since there are billions and billions of stars, it is very likely that at least one other planet has life. It provides a guess that for every 100,000 stars, there is probably one planet that can support living things. Answer Explanation: The answer is vii, which means Paragraph C focuses on the 'Likelihood of life on other planets.' Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is vii because Paragraph C explains why scientists believe there is a strong chance that life exists elsewhere. It mentions the massive number of stars and galaxies in existence and uses this data to make an 'educated guess' or 'estimate' about how common life-bearing planets might be. The paragraph moves from the idea that it is 'inconceivable' (impossible to imagine) that we are alone to providing a specific statistical probability of life occurring. |
| Q16 | i | It turns out that, for a given amount of transmitted power, radio waves in the frequency range 1000 to 3000 MHz travel the greatest distance, and so all searches to date have concentrated on looking for radio waves in this frequency range | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that radio signals are the best way to communicate over long distances in space, so scientists focus their search on finding these specific signals. Answer Explanation: The answer is heading 'i', which indicates that the main topic of the paragraph is the effort to find radio signals sent from other worlds. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'i' because Paragraph D focuses on the method of the search—using radio waves. It explains that radio waves are the most efficient way to send information across space. The paragraph also lists specific scientific projects and telescopes, such as those used by NASA and the Parkes telescope, which are specifically 'seeking' or looking for these 'transmissions' (radio signals) within a specific frequency range. |
| Q17 | ii | There is considerable debate over how we should react if we detect a signal from an alien civilisation. Everybody agrees that we should not reply immediately | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that there is a lot of talk about what we should do if we hear from aliens. It also says that everyone thinks we should not send an answer back very fast. Answer Explanation: The answer 'ii' means the right ways to act or answer if we hear from another world. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'ii' because paragraph E talks about the way humans should act if they find a message from an alien civilization. It explains that there is a big talk, or debate, about the right way to react. It mentions that we should not answer the message right away because we need to think about what is correct and how it might change our world. The paragraph uses terms like 'react' and 'reply' which are synonyms for the word 'responses' used in the heading. |
| Q18 | several billion years | Since the lifetime of a planet like ours is several billion years, we can expect that, if other civilisations do survive in our galaxy, their ages will range from zero to several billion years | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that a planet similar to Earth has a total length of life that lasts for billions of years. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the Earth is expected to exist for many billions of years. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in Section A of the text. The passage discusses our survival compared to other possible civilizations. It mentions that the "lifetime"—which is a synonym for life expectancy—of a planet like Earth is "several billion years." |
| Q19 | radio waves / radio signals / radio | as we search for radio signals from other intelligent civilisations | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that people are currently trying to find out if there is life on other planets by looking for signals sent via radio. Answer Explanation: The answer means that scientists are looking for messages sent by radio, such as "radio signals" or "radio waves," coming from intelligent life in space. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "radio (waves/signals)" because the passage describes SETI as a search for "radio signals" from other intelligent civilizations. It explains that "radio waves" are used for these searches because they can travel the greatest distances across the galaxy to reach us. |
| Q20 | 1000 stars / 1000 | This part of the project is searching the nearest 1000 likely stars with high sensitivity for signals in the frequency range 1000 to 3000 MHz | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that this specific group of stars (the closest 1000) is being carefully checked for radio signals by the main telescopes. Answer Explanation: The answer is 1000, which is the number of stars scientists are looking at with their biggest equipment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 1000 because Paragraph D describes a project that uses the world's largest radio telescopes (located in Arecibo and Nancy). The text explicitly says that this specific part of the project is looking at the nearest 1000 likely stars. |
| Q21 | YES | It is even possible that the older civilisation may pass on the benefits of their experience in dealing with threats to survival such as nuclear war and global pollution, and other threats that we haven't yet discovered | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that an older group of aliens might give us the 'benefits' of their knowledge about survival, specifically help with problems like war and pollution. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means the writer believes that beings from other planets might help humans fix very difficult and dangerous problems. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer YES is based on the idea that older, more advanced civilizations might have survived dangers like nuclear war or pollution. The passage suggests they could share their experience to help us survive similar 'threats.' Keywords like 'benefits' and 'dealing with threats' show that this is seen as a way to overcome serious problems. |
| Q22 | YES | Second, we make a very conservative assumption that we are looking for a life form that is pretty well like us, since if it differs radically from us we may well not recognise it as a life form, quite apart from whether we are able to communicate with it | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that researchers assume they are searching for life that is very much like humans. They do this because they might not realize something is a living thing if it is too different from us. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that it is true that SETI scientists look for life that is very similar to humans. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the text explains that scientists use a 'conservative assumption' when searching for extra-terrestrial life. This means they choose to look for a 'life form' that is 'pretty well like us'. The writer says that if an alien was very different, humans might not even know it was alive or be able to talk to it. The text mentions that these life forms would 'resemble us' by communicating with others and living on a planet similar to Earth. |
| Q23 | NOT GIVEN | So far there have been a number of searches by various groups around the world, including Australian searches using the radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales. Until now there have not been any detections from the few hundred stars which have been searched. The scale of the searches has been increased dramatically since 1992, when the US Congress voted NASA $10 million per year for ten years to conduct a thorough search for extra-terrestrial life | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage mentions that Australian groups and American groups (NASA) are both searching for signals from space. However, it treats them as different groups and does not mention any partnership or shared work between the two nations. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the provided text does not contain any information about whether citizens or organizations from America and Australia worked together on the same projects. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage mentions research being done in Australia (at the radio telescope in Parkes) and research being done by the US (through NASA), but it never says that they worked together or 'co-operated' on a 'joint' project. The text simply lists them as separate examples of groups searching for extraterrestrial life. |
| Q24 | NO | Until now there have not been any detections from the few hundred stars which have been searched | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that researchers have already checked a few hundred stars, but they have not caught any signals from them up to this point in time. Answer Explanation: The answer is NO because the statement says scientists have found signals, but the writer says they have not found any yet. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage clearly states that although scientists have searched many stars, they have not found any signals or signs of life so far. The word 'detections' means finding something you are looking for, and 'not been any' means it hasn't happened. |
| Q25 | NOT GIVEN | The scale of the searches has been increased dramatically since 1992, when the US Congress voted NASA $10 million per year for ten years to conduct a thorough search for extra-terrestrial life | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Congress gave NASA a specific amount of money to support the search for life, but it does not mention if any members of Congress complained about it. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not say whether or not some politicians in Congress were unhappy with the NASA project. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage mentions that the US Congress provided money for the NASA project, but it never mentions any criticism or negative feedback from the members. While the text explains that Congress 'voted' to give NASA $10 million a year, it stays silent on whether there were people who disagreed or spoke against it. In reading tests, if the information is missing from the text, you must choose 'NOT GIVEN'. |
| Q26 | NO | It's not important, then, if there's a delay of a few years, or decades, while the human race debates the question of whether to reply, and perhaps carefully drafts a reply | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that waiting for many years to answer is not a problem because people need time to discuss the best way to reply. Answer Explanation: The answer is NO because the writer says we do not need to answer a message from space quickly. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the text explicitly states it is 'not important' if there is a long wait before we answer. The author explains that humans should take time to talk about how to respond. Because stars are so far away, a 'delay' of many years is fine and will not make a difference. This directly contradicts the idea that responding 'promptly' (quickly) is important. |
