MAKING EVERY DROP COUNT - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 07 Academic Reading Test 1 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14–26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 on the following pages.
MAKING EVERY DROP COUNT
A The history of human civilisation is entwined with the history of the ways we have learned to manipulate water resources. As towns gradually expanded, water was brought from increasingly remote sources, leading to sophisticated engineering efforts such as dams and aqueducts. At the height of the Roman Empire, nine major systems, with an innovative layout of pipes and well-built sewers, supplied the occupants of Rome with as much water per person as is provided in many parts of the industrial world today.
B During the industrial revolution and population explosion of the 19th and 20th centuries, the demand for water rose dramatically. Unprecedented construction of tens of thousands of monumental engineering projects designed to control floods, protect clean water supplies, and provide water for irrigation and hydropower brought great benefits to hundreds of millions of people. Food production has kept pace with soaring populations mainly because of the expansion of artificial irrigation systems that make possible the growth of 40 % of the world's food. Nearly one fifth of all the electricity generated worldwide is produced by turbines spun by the power of falling water.
C Yet there is a dark side to this picture: despite our progress, half of the world's population still suffers, with water services inferior to those available to the ancient Greeks and Romans. As the United Nations report on access to water reiterated in November 2001, more than one billion people lack access to clean drinking water; some two and a half billion do not have adequate sanitation services. Preventable water-related diseases kill an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 children every day, and the latest evidence suggests that we are falling behind in efforts to solve these problems.
D The consequences of our water policies extend beyond jeopardising human health. Tens of millions of people have been forced to move from their homes - often with little warning or compensation - to make way for the reservoirs behind dams. More than 20 % of all freshwater fish species are now threatened or endangered because dams and water withdrawals have destroyed the free-flowing river ecosystems where they thrive. Certain irrigation practices degrade soil quality and reduce agricultural productivity. Groundwater aquifers* are being pumped down faster than they are naturally replenished in parts of India, China, the USA and elsewhere. And disputes over shared water resources have led to violence and continue to raise local, national and even international tensions.
E At the outset of the new millennium, however, the way resource planners think about water is beginning to change. The focus is slowly shifting back to the provision of basic human and environmental needs as top priority - ensuring 'some for all,' instead of 'more for some'. Some water experts are now demanding that existing infrastructure be used in smarter ways rather than building new facilities, which is increasingly considered the option of last, not first, resort. This shift in philosophy has not been universally accepted, and it comes with strong opposition from some established water organisations. Nevertheless, it may be the only way to address successfully the pressing problems of providing everyone with clean water to drink, adequate water to grow food and a life free from preventable water-related illness.
F Fortunately - and unexpectedly - the demand for water is not rising as rapidly as some predicted. As a result, the pressure to build new water infrastructures has diminished over the past two decades. Although population, industrial output and economic productivity have continued to soar in developed nations, the rate at which people withdraw water from aquifers, rivers and lakes has slowed. And in a few parts of the world, demand has actually fallen.
G What explains this remarkable turn of events? Two factors: people have figured out how to use water more efficiently, and communities are rethinking their priorities for water use. Throughout the first three-quarters of the 20th century, the quantity of freshwater consumed per person doubled on average; in the USA, water withdrawals increased tenfold while the population quadrupled. But since 1980, the amount of water consumed per person has actually decreased, thanks to a range of new technologies that help to conserve water in homes and industry. In 1965, for instance, Japan used approximately 13 million gallons* of water to produce $1 million of commercial output; by 1989 this had dropped to 3.5 million gallons (even accounting for inflation) - almost a quadrupling of water productivity. In the USA, water withdrawals have fallen by more than 20 % from their peak in 1980.
H On the other hand, dams, aqueducts and other kinds of infrastructure will still have to be built, particularly in developing countries where basic human needs have not been met. But such projects must be built to higher specifications and with more accountability to local people and their environment than in the past. And even in regions where new projects seem warranted, we must find ways to meet demands with fewer resources, respecting ecological criteria and to a smaller budget.
* underground stores of water
* 1 gallon: 4.546 litres
Questions
Questions 14–20 Matching Headings
Reading Passage 2 has seven paragraphs, A-H.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs A and C-H from the list of headings below.
i. Scientists' call for a revision of policy
ii. An explanation for reduced water use
iii. How a global challenge was met
iv. Irrigation systems fall into disuse
v. Environmental effects
vi. The financial cost of recent technological improvements
vii. The relevance to health
viii. Addressing the concern over increasing populations
ix. A surprising downward trend in demand for water
x. The need to raise standards
xi. A description of ancient water supplies
Questions 21–26 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
Write
YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | xi | At the height of the Roman Empire, nine major systems, with an innovative layout of pipes and well-built sewers, supplied the occupants of Rome with as much water per person as is provided in many parts of the industrial world today | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that during the time of the Roman Empire, there were advanced systems of pipes and sewers that gave people in Rome a lot of water, similar to how modern countries do now. Answer Explanation: The answer is xi (A description of ancient water supplies). This means the paragraph talks about the ways people collected and used water a long time ago. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is xi because Paragraph A focuses on the history of water manipulation, specifically mentioning techniques used by the Roman Empire. The text describes 'ancient' systems like aqueducts, pipes, and sewers that were built many centuries ago to provide water to cities. These details match the description of 'ancient water supplies'. |
| Q15 | vii | Preventable water-related diseases kill an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 children every day, and the latest evidence suggests that we are falling behind in efforts to solve these problems | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that illnesses caused by water are a serious problem because they cause the deaths of many thousands of children every single day. Answer Explanation: The answer 'vii' means that the main topic of this paragraph is how water is connected to people's physical well-being and sickness. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is vii because Paragraph C highlights the negative human impact of poor water management. It describes how over a billion people do not have clean water to drink and billions do not have proper toilets (sanitation). The text focuses heavily on the fact that sicknesses caused by water lead to the deaths of thousands of children every day. In this context, 'relevance' means how something is connected, and 'health' refers to these issues of disease and survival. |
| Q16 | v | More than 20 % of all freshwater fish species are now threatened or endangered because dams and water withdrawals have destroyed the free-flowing river ecosystems where they thrive | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that building dams and removing water from rivers has damaged the natural areas where fish live, causing many types of fish to be in danger of disappearing. This is a direct example of an environmental effect. Answer Explanation: The answer is the heading 'Environmental effects'. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is correct because Paragraph D lists the negative impacts of water management on nature. It explains how dams and taking water from rivers have harmed fish species and destroyed their natural homes. Additionally, it mentions that farming methods can ruin the quality of the soil and that underground water is being used up too quickly. These are all examples of how human water use affects the environment. |
| Q17 | i | Some water experts are now demanding that existing infrastructure be used in smarter ways rather than building new facilities, which is increasingly considered the option of last, not first, resort | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that people who know a lot about water (experts) are now insisting that we use our current systems more effectively instead of always trying to build new ones. Answer Explanation: The answer i means that experts who study water (scientists) are asking for the rules and methods (policy) used to manage water to be changed (revised). Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is suitable because Paragraph E focuses on how 'water experts' are 'demanding' a change in the way water resources are planned. Instead of the old policy of constantly building new structures, they propose a 'shift' toward using current systems better and meeting basic needs. This demand for a new approach is a 'revision of policy' requested by those experts. |
| Q18 | ix | Fortunately - and unexpectedly - the demand for water is not rising as rapidly as some predicted And in a few parts of the world, demand has actually fallen |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the need for water is not increasing as fast as people believed it would, and in some areas, the amount of water people use is actually going down. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the paragraph explains how the amount of water people need is decreasing, which was a surprise to many experts. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is ix because Paragraph F mentions that the demand for water is 'unexpectedly' not growing as fast as people thought. It also states that in some places, the amount of water used has 'fallen.' The word 'unexpectedly' matches 'surprising' in the heading, and 'fallen' matches the 'downward trend.' |
| Q19 | ii | What explains this remarkable turn of events? Two factors: people have figured out how to use water more efficiently, and communities are rethinking their priorities for water use | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage asks why there is a change in how much water is used and then gives two reasons: people have found ways to use water better and society is changing what it thinks is important. Answer Explanation: The answer means that this paragraph tells us the reasons why people are now using less water than before. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Option ii because Paragraph G focuses on the reasons behind a drop in water consumption. It starts with a question about what explains this change and then provides two specific factors: better efficiency and new priorities. The text uses terms like 'decreased' and 'fallen' to show that water use has been reduced, and it explains this change using examples from Japan and the USA. |
| Q20 | x | But such projects must be built to higher specifications and with more accountability to local people and their environment than in the past | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that future water projects need to be constructed with better quality (higher specifications) and more responsibility (accountability) toward the community and the environment compared to how things were done before. Answer Explanation: The answer identifies 'The need to raise standards' as the most appropriate heading for Paragraph H. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is x because Paragraph H focuses on how future water projects, such as dams and aqueducts, should be improved. It states that these projects need to be built to 'higher specifications' and with 'more accountability' to people and the environment than they were in the past. This requirement for better quality and more responsibility is a direct match for the idea of 'raising standards' (making rules or levels of quality better). |
| Q21 | NO | At the height of the Roman Empire, nine major systems, with an innovative layout of pipes and well-built sewers, supplied the occupants of Rome with as much water per person as is provided in many parts of the industrial world today | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that in the past, the water systems in Rome provided the same amount of water to each person as many modern industrial parts of the world do now. Answer Explanation: The answer means the sentence in the question is not true according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the author states that people in Rome during the Roman Empire were given the same amount of water per person as people in many modern industrial countries. The question claims that modern water use is higher, which contradicts (is the opposite of) the text saying they are equal. The key phrase to look for is 'as much water per person as', which indicates equality rather than one being higher than the other. |
| Q22 | YES | Food production has kept pace with soaring populations mainly because of the expansion of artificial irrigation systems that make possible the growth of 40 % of the world's food | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that we have enough food for the very fast-growing population mostly because we have increased the use of man-made systems to water plants. Answer Explanation: The answer is YES because the writing says that the main reason we can grow enough food for more people is because we have better man-made ways to give plants water. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because paragraph B explains that food production has stayed at the same level as the very fast-growing ('soaring') population. The primary reason ('mainly') given for this is the growth ('expansion') of man-made watering methods ('artificial irrigation systems'). Since 'mainly' means the same thing as 'primarily', the statement matches what is written in the text. |
| Q23 | NOT GIVEN | At the height of the Roman Empire, nine major systems, with an innovative layout of pipes and well-built sewers, supplied the occupants of Rome with as much water per person as is provided in many parts of the industrial world today half of the world's population still suffers, with water services inferior to those available to the ancient Greeks and Romans |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage compares how much water people received in ancient Rome to people in modern industrial countries. It also mentions that many people today have water services that are worse (inferior) than what the Greeks and Romans had. However, stating that ancient systems were as good as or better than modern ones is not the same as saying that modern systems are built to look like or act like those ancient ones. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the article does not state whether or not modern water systems are designed to copy or follow the style of ancient Greek and Roman systems. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the writer compares the performance of ancient water systems to modern ones, there is no mention of modern systems being modeled after or 'imitating' them. The text uses ancient Rome and Greece as a benchmark to show that they had very advanced water supplies, sometimes even better than what people have in certain parts of the world today. Key words like 'supplied' and 'inferior' describe the amount and quality of water service, but they do not suggest that the actual design or technology is being copied (imitated) by modern engineers. |
| Q24 | NO | Although population, industrial output and economic productivity have continued to soar in developed nations, the rate at which people withdraw water from aquifers, rivers and lakes has slowed. And in a few parts of the world, demand has actually fallen | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that in developed countries, even though businesses are growing and producing more, the speed at which they use water from natural sources has slowed down, and in some areas, they are actually using less water than they used to. Answer Explanation: The answer is NO, which means the statement is false according to the writer. Industrial growth does not always lead to an increase in water demand. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage explains that even though industrial output (the amount of goods factories make) is continuing to rise quickly or 'soar,' the actual amount of water people take from nature has either slowed down or decreased. This is because technologies have become more efficient, allowing industries to produce more while using less water. Therefore, industrial growth is not currently causing a general increase in the demand for water in many developed areas. |
| Q25 | YES | But since 1980, the amount of water consumed per person has actually decreased, thanks to a range of new technologies that help to conserve water in homes and industry | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that from 1980 onwards, the volume of water each person uses has gone down because of various new inventions that help save water in houses and businesses. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that the passage agrees with the statement that modern tools and inventions have helped decrease the amount of water used in people's houses. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because Paragraph G explicitly states that since 1980, water consumption per person has decreased. It attributes this change to 'new technologies'—a synonym for 'modern technologies'—that help 'conserve water in homes', which refers to 'domestic water consumption'. |
| Q26 | NOT GIVEN | On the other hand, dams, aqueducts and other kinds of infrastructure will still have to be built, particularly in developing countries where basic human needs have not been met. But such projects must be built to higher specifications and with more accountability to local people and their environment than in the past | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that new water projects like dams and pipes are still necessary in some areas, but they need to be higher quality and respect the local people and nature. It does not mention who should own these projects. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the writer never states whether governments should own water systems like dams and pipes in the future. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the text discusses the need for new water systems and how they should be built, it does not mention the topic of "ownership." The author talks about making projects better for the environment and being more responsible toward local people, but there is no information about whether governments, private companies, or other groups should own them. Because this information is missing, we cannot say if the statement agrees or disagrees with the writer. |
