Radiocarbon Dating The Profile Of Nancy Athfield - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Recent Actual Test 5 Academic Reading Test 3 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Radiocarbon Dating The Profile of Nancy Athfield
Have you ever picked up a small stone off the ground and wondered how old it was? Chances are, that stone has been around many more years than your own lifetime. Many scientists share this curiosity about the age of inanimate objects like rocks, fossils and precious stones. Knowing how old an object is can provide valuable information about our prehistoric past. In most societies, human beings have kept track of history through writing. However, scientists are still curious about the world before writing, or even the world before humans. Studying the age of objects is our best way to piece together histories of our pre-historic past. One such method of finding the age of an object is called radiocarbon dating. This method can find the age of any object based on the kind of particles and atoms that are found inside of the object. Depending on what elements the object is composed of, radiocarbon can be a reliable way to find an object's age. One famous specialist in this method is the researcher Nancy Athfield. Athfield studied the ancient remains found in the country of Cambodia. Many prehistoric remains were discovered by the local people of Cambodia. These objects were thought to belong to some of the original groups of humans that first came to the country of Cambodia. The remains had never been scientifically studied, so Nancy was greatly intrigued by the opportunity to use modern methods to discover the true age of these ancient objects.
Athfield had this unique opportunity because her team, comprised of scientists and filmmakers, were in Cambodia working on a documentary. The team was trying to discover evidence to prove a controversial claim in history: that Cambodia was the resting place for the famous royal family of Angkor. At that time, written records and historic accounts conflicted on the true resting place. Many people across the world disagreed over where the final resting place was. For the first time, Athfield and her team had a chance to use radiocarbon dating to find new evidence. They had a chance to solve the historic mystery that many had been arguing over for years.
Athfield and her team conducted radiocarbon dating of many of the ancient objects found in the historic site of Angkor Wat. Nancy found the history of Angkor went back to as early as 1620. According to historic records, the remains of the Angkor royal family were much younger than that, so this evidence cast a lot of doubt as to the status of the ancient remains. The research ultimately raised more questions. If the remains were not of the royal family, then whose remains were being kept in the ancient site? Athfield’s team left Cambodia with more questions unanswered. Since Athfield’s team studied the remains, new remains have been unearthed at the ancient site of Angkor Wat, so it is possible that these new remains could be the true remains of the royal family. Nancy wished to come back to continue her research one day.
In her early years, the career of Athfield was very unconventional. She didn’t start her career as a scientist. At the beginning, she would take any kind of job to pay her bills. Most of them were low-paying jobs or brief Community service opportunities. She worked often but didn’t know what path she would ultimately take. But eventually, her friend suggested that Athfield invest in getting a degree. The friend recommended that Athfield attend a nearby university. Though doubtful of her own qualifications, she applied and was eventually accepted by the school. It was there that she met Willard Libby, the inventor of radiocarbon dating. She took his class and soon had the opportunity to complete hands-on research. She soon realised that science was her passion. After graduation, she quickly found a job in a research institution.
After college, Athfield’s career in science blossomed. She eventually married, and her husband landed a job at the prestigious organisation GNN. Athfield joined her husband in the same organisation, and she became a lab manager in the institution. She earned her PhD in scientific research, and completed her studies on a kind of rat when it first appeared in New Zealand. There, she created original research and found many flaws in the methods being used in New Zealand laboratories. Her research showed that the subject’s diet led to the fault in the earlier research. She was seen as an expert by her peers in New Zealand, and her opinion and expertise were widely respected. She had come a long way from her old days of working odd jobs. It seemed that Athfield’s career was finally taking off.
But Athfield’s interest in scientific laboratories wasn’t her only interest. She didn’t settle down in New Zealand. Instead, she expanded her areas of expertise. Athfield eventually joined the field of Anthropology, the study of human societies, and became a well-qualified archaeologist. It was during her blossoming career as an archaeologist that Athfield became involved with the famous Cambodia project. Even as the filmmakers ran out of funding and left Cambodia, Athfield continued to stay and continue her research.
In 2003, the film was finished in uncertain conclusions, but Nancy continued her research on the ancient ruins of Angkor Wat. This research was not always easy. Her research was often delayed by lack of funding, and government paperwork. Despite her struggles, she committed to finishing her research. Finally, she made a breakthrough. Using radiocarbon dating, Athfield completed a database for the materials found in Cambodia. As a newcomer to Cambodia, she lacked a complete knowledge of Cambodian geology, which made this feat even more difficult. Through steady determination and ingenuity, Athfield finally completed the database. Though many did not believe she could finish, her research now remains an influential and tremendous contribution to geological sciences in Cambodia. In the future, radiocarbon dating continues to be a valuable research skill. Athfield will be remembered as one of the first to bring this scientific method to the study of the ancient ruins of Angkor Wat.
Questions
Questions 1–7 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
Write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts with the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Questions 8–13 Flow Chart Completion
Complete the flow-chart below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
The Career of Nancy Athfield
During her mid-teens, Nancy wasn't expected to attend 8.
↓
Willard Billy later helped Nancy to find that she was interested in science.
↓
Her PhD degree was researching when a kind of 9 first went into New Zealand.
↓
Her research showed that the subject's 10 accounted for the fault in the earlier research.
↓
She was a professional 11 before she went back to Cambodia in 2003.
↓
When she returned Cambodia, the lack of 12 was a barrier for her research.
↓
Then she compiled the 13 of the Cambodia radiocarbon dating of the ancients.
↓
After that, the lack of a detailed map of the geology of Cambodia became a hindrance of her research.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | FALSE | Many prehistoric remains were discovered by the local people of Cambodia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage tells us that the old things from a very long time ago were found by the people who live in Cambodia, not by Nancy Athfield. Answer Explanation: The answer 'FALSE' means that the statement, 'Nancy Athfield first discovered the ancient remains in Cambodia,' is not true. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states that the 'local people of Cambodia' were the ones who found many of the old objects first. Nancy Athfield then came to 'study' these ancient objects, but she did not discover them herself. |
| Q2 | NOT GIVEN | Many prehistoric remains were discovered by the local people of Cambodia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that people living in Cambodia found many very old things left behind from a time long ago. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NOT GIVEN' means that the passage does not provide any information about whether the remains found in Cambodia were in good condition or not. We cannot know from the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage mentions the discovery of 'ancient remains' and 'prehistoric remains' in Cambodia, and that Nancy Athfield studied them. However, the passage does not include any details or description about the 'condition' of these remains, such as if they were in 'good condition' or bad condition. The text simply states they were found and studied. |
| Q3 | NOT GIVEN | Athfield had this unique opportunity because her team, comprised of scientists and filmmakers, were in Cambodia working on a documentary | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Nancy had a special chance to do this work because she and her team, who were scientists and filmmakers, were already in Cambodia making a movie. It tells us why she was there, but not if it was a break from another job. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NOT GIVEN' means that the passage does not tell us if Nancy stopped her usual job to work in Cambodia. We don't have enough information to say yes or no. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage explains that Nancy Athfield was in Cambodia with her team because 'they were working on a documentary.' The passage introduces her as a 'researcher' and a 'specialist,' suggesting that doing research and working on documentaries could be part of her regular job. There is no information in the passage to confirm or deny that she took 'time off' from her usual work. The passage only states the reason she was there. |
| Q4 | FALSE | The remains had never been scientifically studied, so Nancy was greatly intrigued by the opportunity to use modern methods to discover the true age of these ancient objects. Athfield had this unique opportunity because her team, comprised of scientists and filmmakers, were in Cambodia working on a documentary | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Nancy was very interested in studying the old objects herself because no one had done it before. It also says she got this special chance because she and her team, who were scientists and people who make films, were making a movie in Cambodia. This shows it was their project, not something the government asked them to do. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'FALSE'. This means the statement is not true based on the information in the passage. The Cambodia government did not ask Nancy to test the old objects. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explains that Nancy Athfield had the chance to study the ancient objects in Cambodia because she was very interested in them, and her team was there to make a film (a documentary). It was her own choice and her team's work, not a request from the Cambodian government. The passage mentions she was 'greatly intrigued by the opportunity' and her 'team, comprised of scientists and filmmakers, were in Cambodia working on a documentary'. There is no information in the text that says the government asked her. |
| Q5 | FALSE | The team was trying to discover evidence to prove a controversial claim in history: that Cambodia was the resting place for the famous royal family of Angkor | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the group of scientists and filmmakers wanted to find proof for an old idea: that the famous royal family of Angkor was buried in Cambodia (their 'resting place'). They were not looking for information on how Angkor was built again. Answer Explanation: The answer, 'FALSE', means that the statement is not true based on the information in the passage. The filmmakers did not try to find out how Angkor was rebuilt. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'FALSE' because the passage clearly states what the filmmakers' goal was. They were trying to find evidence about where the royal family of Angkor was buried, not how Angkor was rebuilt. The passage mentions that 'The team was trying to discover evidence to prove a controversial claim in history: that Cambodia was the resting place for the famous royal family of Angkor.' This shows their aim was different from what the question suggests. |
| Q6 | NOT GIVEN | The team was trying to discover evidence to prove a controversial claim in history: that Cambodia was the resting place for the famous royal family of Angkor. At that time, written records and historic accounts conflicted on the true resting place. Many people across the world disagreed over where the final resting place was | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says Nancy's team wanted to find proof about a debated idea: that Cambodia held the dead royal family. It also says old writings and stories did not agree, and many people around the world had different ideas about where the royal family was buried. This part shows there was a big question, but not what Nancy herself thought at first. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'NOT GIVEN'. This means the passage does not tell us if Nancy first thought the royal family was not in Cambodia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage explains that Nancy Athfield's team was trying to find proof for a 'controversial claim' about the royal family's resting place in Cambodia. It also states that 'written records and historic accounts conflicted' and 'many people across the world disagreed' about where the royal family was buried. However, the passage never says that Nancy *personally* had 'initially doubted' this claim herself before starting her research. It only describes the general disagreement and the team's goal to find evidence to solve the mystery. |
| Q7 | TRUE | Nancy found the history of Angkor went back to as early as 1620. According to historic records, the remains of the Angkor royal family were much younger than that, so this evidence cast a lot of doubt as to the status of the ancient remains | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says Nancy learned that the old things were from 1620 or even before. But old books or notes say the royal family's bones were from a much later time. Because of this, it made people strongly question if the old things found were really from the royal family. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Nancy showed it was not possible for the old bones and things found to be from the Angkor royal family. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explains that Nancy Athfield's research proved the remains were older than the Angkor royal family. Nancy used a method called 'radiocarbon dating' to find out how old the objects were. The passage states that the found objects were from as early as 1620, but records showed the royal family's remains were 'much younger.' This big difference in age made it clear the objects could not belong to the royal family and 'cast a lot of doubt' on that idea, which means she disproved it. |
| Q8 | university | Though doubtful of her own qualifications, she applied and was eventually accepted by the school | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Nancy was unsure if she was good enough for school, but she tried anyway and got in. This shows she didn't think she would go to university at first. Answer Explanation: The answer 'university' means a big school where students go to learn after high school to get a degree. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'university' because the passage states that Nancy Athfield was not confident about her ability to get into a school like a university. Her friend had to suggest she 'attend a nearby university,' and Nancy was 'doubtful of her own qualifications' before applying. This tells us she didn't expect to go to or wasn't sure if she could get into a university. |
| Q9 | rat | She earned her PhD in scientific research, and completed her studies on a kind of rat when it first appeared in New Zealand | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Nancy got her special science degree, called a PhD. For this degree, she studied a type of small animal, a rat, and how it first arrived in the country of New Zealand. Answer Explanation: The answer 'rat' refers to a small animal with a long tail, similar to a mouse. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'rat' because the passage clearly states that Nancy Athfield's PhD study focused on this specific animal. It mentions she 'completed her studies on a kind of rat when it first appeared in New Zealand,' directly answering what animal her PhD research was about in New Zealand. |
| Q10 | diet | Her research showed that the subject’s diet led to the fault in the earlier research | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Nancy's study found that what the animals ate was the cause of problems in earlier studies. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'diet'. This means what an animal or person eats. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'diet' because the passage explains Nancy Athfield's research in New Zealand. It states that she studied a kind of rat and found problems in earlier research. Her work showed that what the rats ate, or their 'diet', was the reason for these mistakes. This detail connects her research to the subject's eating habits. |
| Q11 | archaeologist | It was during her blossoming career as an archaeologist that Athfield became involved with the famous Cambodia project. Even as the filmmakers ran out of funding and left Cambodia, Athfield continued to stay and continue her research | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Nancy Athfield was a growing and successful 'archaeologist' when she started working on the Cambodia project. Even when the people making the movie left Cambodia because they ran out of money, Nancy stayed there to keep doing her research. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'archaeologist'. This means Nancy Athfield was a person who studies old human history by looking at things people left behind, like tools or buildings, before she went back to Cambodia in 2003. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'archaeologist' because the passage states that Nancy Athfield joined the field of Anthropology and became an 'archaeologist'. It explicitly mentions that her involvement with the 'famous Cambodia project' happened during her 'blossoming career as an archaeologist', right before the part where filmmakers left Cambodia and she continued her research, which leads up to her work in 2003. |
| Q12 | funding | Her research was often delayed by lack of funding, and government paperwork | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Nancy's work was often stopped or made slow because there wasn't enough money ('lack of funding'). This shows that not having enough money was a problem for her research. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'funding'. This means Nancy needed money to help her research in Cambodia, but she didn't always have enough. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'funding' because the passage mentions that Nancy Athfield's research in Cambodia faced difficulties due to a 'lack of funding'. When she returned to Cambodia, the absence of enough money was a big problem, acting as a 'barrier' or delay for her work. |
| Q13 | database | Using radiocarbon dating, Athfield completed a database for the materials found in Cambodia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Nancy used a special scientific method called radiocarbon dating to find the age of things. With this method, she finished making a 'database,' which is like a big, organized list of all the different materials and objects found in Cambodia. Answer Explanation: The answer, 'database,' means a collection of organized information. Nancy Athfield created this collection of facts about old things found in Cambodia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'database' because the passage clearly states that after facing many difficulties, Nancy Athfield achieved a significant breakthrough. It says she 'completed a database for the materials found in Cambodia' by using her special method, radiocarbon dating. This directly matches the part of the flow-chart asking what she compiled. |
