Smell And Memory: SMELLS LIKE YESTERDAY - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Past Papers Academic Reading Test 25 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
Smell and Memory: SMELLS LIKE YESTERDAY
Why does the scent of a fragrance or the mustiness of an old trunk trigger such powerful memories of childhood? New research has the answer, writes Alexandra Witze.
A. You probably pay more attention to a newspaper with your eyes than with your nose. But lift the paper to your nostrils and inhale. The smell of newsprint might carry you back to your childhood, when your parents perused the paper on Sunday mornings. Or maybe some other smell takes you back- the scent of your mother's perfume, the pungency of a driftwood campfire. Specific odours can spark a flood of reminiscences. Psychologists call it the "Proustian phenomeno" after French novelist Marcel Proust. Near the beginning of the masterpiece In Search of Lost Time, Proust's narrator dunks a madeleine cookie into a cup of tea and the scent and taste unleash a torrent of childhood memories for 3000 pages.
B. Now, this phenomenon is getting the scientific treatment. Neuroscientists Rachel Herz, a cognitive neuroscientist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, have discovered, for instance, how sensory memories are shared across the brain, with different brain regions remembering the sights, smells, tastes and sounds of a particular experience. Meanwhile, psychologists have demonstrated that memories triggered by smells can be more emotional, as well as more detailed, than memories not related to smells. When you inhale, odour molecules set brain cells dancing within a region known as the imygdala (E ), a part of the brain that helps control emotion. In contrast, the other senses, such as taste or touch, get routed through other parts of the brain before reaching the amygdala. The direct link between odours and the amygdala may help explain the emotional potency of smells. ”There is this unique connection between the sense of smell and the part of the brain that processes emotion," says Rachel Herz.
C. But the links don't stop there. Like an octopus reaching its tentacles outward, the memory of smells affects other brain regions as well. In recent experiments, neuroscientists at University College London (UCL) asked 15 volunteers to look at pictures while smelling unrelated odours. For instance, the subjects might see a photo of a duck paired with the scent of a rose, and then be asked to create a story linking the two. Brain scans taken at the time revealed that the volunteers’brains were particularly active in a region known as the factory cortex, which is known to be involved in processing smells. Five minutes later, the volunteers were shown the duck photo again, but without the rose smell. And in their brains, the olfactory cortex lit up again, the scientists reported recently. The fact that the olfactory cortex became active in the absence of the odour suggests that people's sensory memory of events is spread across different brain regions. Imagine going on a seaside holiday, says UCL team leader, Jay Gottfried. The sight of the waves becomes stored in one area, whereas the crash of the surf goes elsewhere, and the smell of seaweed in yet another place. There could be advantages to having memories spread around the brain. "You can reawaken that memory from any one of the sensory triggers," says Gottfried. "Maybe the smell of the sun lotion, or a particular sound from that day, or the sight of a rock formation." Or - in the case of an early hunter and gatherer (out on a plain - the sight of a lion might be enough to trigger the urge to flee, rather than having to wait for the sound of its roar and the stench of its hide to kick in as well.
D. Remembered smells may also carry extra emotional baggage, says Herz. Her research suggests that memories triggered by odours are more emotional than memories triggered by other cues. In one recent study, Herz recruited five volunteers who had vivid memories associated with a particular perfume, such as opium for Women and Juniper Breeze from Bath and Body Works. She took images of the volunteers' brains as they sniffed that perfume and an unrelated perfume without knowing which was which. (They were also shown photos of each perfume bottle.) Smelling the specified perfume activated the volunteers brains the most, particularly in the amygdala, and in a region called the hippocampus which helps in memory formation. Herz published the work earlier this year in the journal Neuropsychologia.
E. But she couldn't be sure that the other senses wouldn't also elicit a strong response. So in another study Herz compared smells with sounds and pictures. She had 70 people describe an emotional memory involving three items - popcorn, fresh-cut grass and a campfire. Then they compared the items through sights, sounds and smells. For instance, a person might see a picture of a lawnmower, then sniff the scent of grass and finally listen to the lawnmower's sound. Memories triggered by smell were more evocative than memories triggered by either sights or sounds.
F. Odour-evoked memories may be not only more emotional, but more detailed as well. Working with colleague John Downes, psychologist Simon Chu of the University of Liverpool started researching odour and memory partly because of his grandmother's stories about Chinese culture. As generations gathered to share oral histories, they would pass a small pot of spice or incense around; later, when they wanted to remember the story in as much detail as possible, they would pass the same smell around again. "It's kind of fits with a lot of anecdotal evidence on how smells can be really good reminders of past experiences,” Chu says. And scientific research seems to bear out the anecdotes. In one experiment, Chu and Downes asked 42 volunteers to tell a life story, then tested to see whether odours such as coffee and cinnamon could help them remember more detail in the story. They could.
G. Despite such studies, not everyone is convinced that Proust can be scientifically analysed. In the June issue of Chemical Senses, Chu and Downes exchanged critiques with renowned perfumer and chemist J. Stephan Jellinek. Jellinek chided the Liverpool researchers for, among other things, presenting the smells and asking the volunteers to think of memories, rather than seeing what memories were spontaneously evoked by the odours. But there's only so much science can do to test a phenomenon that's inherently different for each person, Chu says. Meanwhile, Jellinek has also been collecting anecdotal accounts of Proustian experiences, hoping to find some common links between the experiences. "I think there is a case to be made that surprise may be a major aspect of the Proust phenomenon," he says. "That's why people are so struck by these memories." No one knows whether Proust ever experienced such a transcendental moment. But his notions of memory, written as fiction nearly a century ago, continue to inspire scientists of today.
Questions
Questions 14–18 Matching Features
Use the information in the passage to match the people (listed A-C) with opinions or deeds below. Write the appropriate letters A-C.
NB you may use any letter more than once
A. Rachel Herz
B. Simon Chu
C. Jay Gottfried
Questions 19–22 One Choice
Choose the correct letter, A, B, c or D.
Questions 23–26 Summary Completion
Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using no more than three words from the Reading Passage for each answer.
In the experiments conducted by UCL, participants were asked to look at a picture with a scent of a flower, then in the next stage, everyone would have to 23 for a connection. A method called 24 suggested that specific area of brain named 25 were quite active. Then in an another parallelled experiment about Chinese elders, storytellers could recall detailed anecdotes when smelling a bowl of 26 or incense around.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | A | Neuroscientists Rachel Herz, a cognitive neuroscientist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, have discovered, for instance, how sensory memories are shared across the brain, with different brain regions remembering the sights, smells, tastes and sounds of a particular experience | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Rachel Herz found out that different parts of the brain are responsible for remembering various senses from an experience, such as sights, smells, tastes, and sounds. Answer Explanation: The answer "A" refers to Rachel Herz. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Rachel Herz discovered that sensory memories are distributed across different areas of the brain, meaning separate brain regions store what we see, smell, taste, and hear. |
| Q15 | B | In one experiment, Chu and Downes asked 42 volunteers to tell a life story, then tested to see whether odours such as coffee and cinnamon could help them remember more detail in the story. They could | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Simon Chu and his colleague conducted an experiment using smells of substances like coffee and cinnamon, showing that these scents helped people remember the details of their life stories. Answer Explanation: The answer B corresponds to Simon Chu. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Paragraph F describes how psychologist Simon Chu investigated whether smells help people recall memories with more details. In his experiment, he tested whether specific substances like coffee and cinnamon could help participants remember more detail about past life events, and found that they could. Key words and phrases to note are "remember more detail in the story" and "odours such as coffee and cinnamon," which directly match "detailed event under a smell of certain substance." |
| Q16 | A | ”There is this unique connection between the sense of smell and the part of the brain that processes emotion," says Rachel Herz | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Rachel Herz identified a special link between the sense of smell and the emotional area in the brain that is not like the other senses. Answer Explanation: The answer "A" means that Rachel Herz is the researcher who stated that smell connects to brain areas in a special way compared to other senses. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Rachel Herz highlights that smell has a "unique connection" to the emotional region of the brain (the amygdala). In paragraph B, the text explains that smell goes directly to this area, whereas other senses are sent through other parts of the brain first, and quotes Rachel Herz confirming this special relationship. |
| Q17 | C | There could be advantages to having memories spread around the brain. "You can reawaken that memory from any one of the sensory triggers," says Gottfried. "Maybe the smell of the sun lotion, or a particular sound from that day, or the sight of a rock formation." Or - in the case of an early hunter and gatherer (out on a plain - the sight of a lion might be enough to trigger the urge to flee, rather than having to wait for the sound of its roar and the stench of its hide to kick in as well | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Jay Gottfried sees an advantage in memories being stored in different brain areas because just one sense, such as seeing a dangerous lion, is enough to make a person run away safely. Answer Explanation: The answer C means that Jay Gottfried is the person connected to the idea that storing memories in different areas of the brain helps humans avoid danger. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because in Paragraph C, researcher Jay Gottfried discusses the benefits of memory parts being "spread around the brain" ("diverse locations of stored information"). He gives an example of an early human seeing a lion, which triggers "the urge to flee" ("keep away the hazard") without needing to wait for the sound or smell. |
| Q18 | C | The fact that the olfactory cortex became active in the absence of the odour suggests that people's sensory memory of events is spread across different brain regions. Imagine going on a seaside holiday, says UCL team leader, Jay Gottfried | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Jay Gottfried's team found that the brain part used for smelling worked even when there was no smell, showing that memory is stored across different brain areas. Answer Explanation: The answer "C" refers to Jay Gottfried, who is connected to the finding that the brain region for processing smells can become active even when no real smell is present. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because paragraph C discusses research led by Jay Gottfried at University College London (UCL). In their experiment, volunteers saw a photo without any smell, yet the olfactory cortex (the brain area responsible for processing smells) still became active. This proved that the brain's smell-processing zone can work in the "absence of the odour," meaning an actual smell is not required to activate that specific brain zone. |
| Q19 | D | ”There is this unique connection between the sense of smell and the part of the brain that processes emotion," says Rachel Herz | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states directly that there is a special link between smelling things and the brain area that handles feelings. Answer Explanation: The answer means that a specific area in our brain connects what we smell with our feelings and emotions. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by Paragraph B, which explains how smell works in the brain. When we smell something, the scent directly triggers the amygdala, which is a brain area that controls emotions. Rachel Herz confirms that there is a special link between the sense of smell and the brain region responsible for processing emotions. This directly matches the idea that a certain part of the brain connects emotion to smell. |
| Q20 | B | Memories triggered by smell were more evocative than memories triggered by either sights or sounds | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that memories brought back by smells had a stronger emotional effect on people than memories brought back by seeing pictures or hearing sounds. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the findings from Herz's second experiment supported and confirmed the findings of her first experiment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Herz ran her second experiment to see if other senses (such as sight and sound) would create the same strong emotional memory response as smell. The results showed that smells were still more evocative (brought out stronger feelings and memories) than sights or sounds. This proved that her initial conclusion from the first experiment—that odour-triggered memories are more emotional than those from other cues—was correct. Keywords to notice include "evocative" (which relates to bringing strong memories and emotions to mind) and comparing "smell" with "sights or sounds". |
| Q21 | C | In one experiment, Chu and Downes asked 42 volunteers to tell a life story, then tested to see whether odours such as coffee and cinnamon could help them remember more detail in the story. They could | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage means that researchers Chu and Downes tested 42 people to see if smelling coffee and cinnamon helped them recall more details while telling their life stories, and the results showed that the smells did indeed help them. Answer Explanation: The answer choice C means that smelling specific scents helps people who are telling stories recall more details from their memories. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Paragraph F explains an experiment done by Chu and Downes. In this test, they checked if scents like coffee and cinnamon could help volunteers remember more details when sharing a personal story, and the experiment showed that "They could." In this context, "assist story tellers" matches helping volunteers recall more details about their life story, and "certain odours" matches specific smells such as coffee and cinnamon. |
| Q22 | C | Jellinek chided the Liverpool researchers for, among other things, presenting the smells and asking the volunteers to think of memories, rather than seeing what memories were spontaneously evoked by the odours | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Jellinek criticized the researchers because they told participants to think of memories after smelling something, instead of observing what memories came up naturally and without prompting. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Jellinek criticized the researchers because their test made people intentionally search for memories instead of observing which specific memories naturally and suddenly surfaced on their own. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by Paragraph G, which explains the disagreement in the journal *Chemical Senses*. Jellinek criticized (or "chided") Chu and Downes for instructing participants to deliberately search their minds for memories upon smelling an odour, rather than testing what memories are triggered spontaneously and naturally. |
| Q23 | create a story / create a storey | For instance, the subjects might see a photo of a duck paired with the scent of a rose, and then be asked to create a story linking the two | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when participants were shown a picture with a smell, they were told to make up a story that connects them together. Answer Explanation: The answer "create a story" means to make up or invent a tale. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by Paragraph C. The passage mentions that in the UCL experiment, participants looked at an image (such as a duck) while smelling a scent (such as a rose) and were then instructed to "create a story" to connect or link the picture and the smell. |
| Q24 | brain scans | Brain scans taken at the time revealed that the volunteers’brains were particularly active in a region known as the factory cortex, which is known to be involved in processing smells | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that taking pictures of the participants' brains (brain scans) showed that a specific part of their brains was very active while they did the test. Answer Explanation: The answer "brain scans" refers to medical pictures or tests taken of the inside of the brain to see which parts are working. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "brain scans" because the summary discusses the method used during the UCL experiment to see brain activity. In paragraph C, the text states that "Brain scans taken at the time revealed that the volunteers’brains were particularly active in a region known as the factory cortex". Therefore, "brain scans" directly completes the sentence about the method used. |
| Q25 | the olfactory cortex / olfactory cortex | And in their brains, the olfactory cortex lit up again, the scientists reported recently. The fact that the olfactory cortex became active in the absence of the odour suggests that people's sensory memory of events is spread across different brain regions | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the "olfactory cortex" in the volunteers' brains became active (lit up) when they were reminded of the picture, even without smelling anything. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the part of the brain that handles smell processing and became active during the experiment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by Paragraph C. The passage mentions that during brain scans, the "olfactory cortex" lit up and became active when participants remembered the paired event, showing that this specific brain area was active even without the actual smell present. |
| Q26 | spice | As generations gathered to share oral histories, they would pass a small pot of spice or incense around; later, when they wanted to remember the story in as much detail as possible, they would pass the same smell around again | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when families met to tell stories from the past, they passed around a small container filled with spice or incense. Smelling the same scent later helped them remember the stories with great detail. Answer Explanation: The answer "spice" refers to a type of plant substance used for flavoring or scent, which people passed around in a small container to help them recall stories. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "spice" because Paragraph F describes how Chinese elders and families passed around a small pot containing either "spice" or "incense" while sharing oral histories to help them recall the detailed stories later. The summary sentence matches this directly with the phrase "when smelling a bowl of spice or incense around." |
