The Thylacine - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 17 Academic Reading Test 3 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
The thylacine
The extinct thylacine, also known as the Tasmanian tiger, was a marsupial* that bore a superficial resemblance to a dog. Its most distinguishing feature was the 13-19 dark brown stripes over its back, beginning at the rear of the body and extending onto the tail. The thylacine’s average nose-to-tail length for adult males was 162.6 cm, compared to 153.7 cm for females.
The thylacine appeared to occupy most types of terrain except dense rainforest, with open eucalyptus forest thought to be its prime habitat. In terms of feeding, it was exclusively carnivorous, and its stomach was muscular with an ability to distend so that it could eat large amounts of food at one time, probably an adaptation to compensate for long periods when hunting was unsuccessful and food scarce. The thylacine was not a fast runner and probably caught its prey by exhausting it during a long pursuit. During long-distance chases, thylacines were likely to have relied more on scent than any other sense. They emerged to hunt during the evening, night and early morning and tended to retreat to the hills and forest for shelter during the day. Despite the common name ‘tiger’, the thylacine had a shy, nervous temperament. Although mainly nocturnal, it was sighted moving during the day and some individuals were even recorded basking in the sun.
The thylacine had an extended breeding season from winter to spring, with indications that some breeding took place throughout the year. The thylacine, like all marsupials, was tiny and hairless when born. Newborns crawled into the pouch on the belly of their mother, and attached themselves to one of the four teats, remaining there for up to three months. When old enough to leave the pouch, the young stayed in a lair such as a deep rocky cave, well-hidden nest or hollow log, whilst the mother hunted.
Approximately 4,000 years ago, the thylacine was widespread throughout New Guinea and most of mainland Australia, as well as the island of Tasmania. The most recent, well-dated occurrence of a thylacine on the mainland is a carbon-dated fossil from Murray Cave in Western Australia, which is around 3,100 years old. Its extinction coincided closely with the arrival of wild dogs called dingoes in Australia and a similar predator in New Guinea. Dingoes never reached Tasmania, and most scientists see this as the main reason for the thylacine’s survival there.
The dramatic decline of the thylacine in Tasmania, which began in the 1830s and continued for a century, is generally attributed to the relentless efforts of sheep farmers and bounty hunters** with shotguns. While this determined campaign undoubtedly played a large part, it is likely that various other factors also contributed to the decline and eventual extinction of the species. These include competition with wild dogs introduced by European settlers, loss of habitat along with the disappearance of prey species, and a distemper-like disease which may also have affected the thylacine.
There was only one successful attempt to breed a thylacine in captivity, at Melbourne Zoo in 1899. This was despite the large numbers that went through some zoos, particularly London Zoo and Tasmania’s Hobart Zoo. The famous naturalist John Gould foresaw the thylacine’s demise when he published his Mammals of Australia between 1848 and 1863, writing, ‘The numbers of this singular animal will speedily diminish, extermination will have its full sway, and it will then, like the wolf of England and Scotland, be recorded as an animal of the past.’
However, there seems to have been little public pressure to preserve the thylacine, nor was much concern expressed by scientists at the decline of this species in the decades that followed. A notable exception was T.T. Flynn, Professor of Biology at the University of Tasmania. In 1914, he was sufficiently concerned about the scarcity of the thylacine to suggest that some should be captured and placed on a small island. But it was not until 1929, with the species on the very edge of extinction, that Tasmania’s Animals and Birds Protection Board passed a motion protecting thylacines only for the month of December, which was thought to be their prime breeding season. The last known wild thylacine to be killed was shot by a farmer in the north-east of Tasmania in 1930, leaving just captive specimens. Official protection of the species by the Tasmanian government was introduced in July 1936, 59 days before the last known individual died in Hobart Zoo on 7th September, 1936.
There have been numerous expeditions and searches for the thylacine over the years, none of which has produced definitive evidence that thylacines still exist. The species was declared extinct by the Tasmanian government in 1986.
*marsupial: a mammal, such as a kangaroo, whose young are born incompletely developed and are typically carried and suckled in a
pouch on the mother's belly
**bounty hunters: people who are paid a reward for killing a wild animal
Questions
Questions 1–5 Note Completion
Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes on your answer sheet.
The thylacine
Appearance and behaviour
- looked rather like a dog
- had a series of stripes along its body and tail
- ate an entirely 1 diet
- probably depended mainly on 2 when hunting
- young spent first months of life inside its mother’s 3
Decline and extinction
- last evidence in mainland Australia is a 3,100-year-old 4
- probably went extinct in mainland Australia due to animals known as dingoes
- reduction in 5 and available sources of food were partly responsible for decline in Tasmania
Questions 6–13 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the Reading Passage?
In boxes on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | carnivorous | In terms of feeding, it was exclusively carnivorous, and its stomach was muscular with an ability to distend so that it could eat large amounts of food at one time | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage tells us that the thylacine only ate meat and had a stomach that could expand to eat a lot of food at once. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the thylacine primarily ate meat. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer matches the information given in the passage that the thylacine had a carnivorous diet, meaning it mainly ate meat. |
| Q2 | scent | During long-distance chases, thylacines were likely to have relied more on scent than any other sense | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage suggests that thylacines relied heavily on their sense of smell during long-distance chases. Answer Explanation: The answer 'scent' refers to the characteristic odor or smell given off by animals that can be detected by other animals. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'scent' because thylacines likely depended mainly on their sense of smell ('scent') when hunting, according to the excerpt. This sense would have been crucial for them to track and locate prey during long-distance chases. |
| Q3 | pouch | Newborns crawled into the pouch on the belly of their mother, and attached themselves to one of the four teats, remaining there for up to three months | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage describes how newborn thylacines would climb into their mother's pouch and stay there for up to three months, feeding off her teats. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the word 'pouch', which means a small bag-like structure that animals like kangaroos and thylacines have to carry their young. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'pouch' because it directly matches the description in the passage where it states that the thylacine's young spent their first months of life inside their mother's pouch, attaching themselves to one of the teats for nourishment. |
| Q4 | fossil | The most recent, well-dated occurrence of a thylacine on the mainland is a carbon-dated fossil from Murray Cave in Western Australia, which is around 3,100 years old | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about the last confirmed presence of a thylacine, which was found in a cave in Western Australia. This evidence is in the form of a fossil that is about 3,100 years old. Answer Explanation: The answer 'fossil' refers to the remains or impressions of a prehistoric organism that have been preserved in the Earth's crust. In this context, the fossil mentioned in the passage represents the last known evidence of a thylacine in mainland Australia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'fossil' because it fits the description of the evidence mentioned in the passage. The fossil found in Western Australia provides a concrete date (3,100 years old) for the last known presence of a thylacine on the mainland. |
| Q5 | habitat | These include competition with wild dogs introduced by European settlers, loss of habitat along with the disappearance of prey species, and a distemper-like disease which may also have affected the thylacine | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage mentions that the decline and extinction of the thylacine were influenced by factors like competition from introduced wild dogs, loss of natural living areas, and the disappearance of prey species. Answer Explanation: The answer 'habitat' refers to the natural environment or surroundings where an animal lives. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'habitat' because the loss of habitat, mentioned in the passage as 'loss of habitat' contributes to the decline and extinction of the thylacine. When an animal's habitat is lost or degraded, it disrupts their ability to find food, shelter, and reproduce, eventually leading to decline in population numbers and potential extinction. |
| Q6 | TRUE | The dramatic decline of the thylacine in Tasmania, which began in the 1830s and continued for a century, is generally attributed to the relentless efforts of sheep farmers and bounty hunters | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how a lot of thylacines in Tasmania were killed by humans starting from the 1830s. Answer Explanation: The answer is saying that a lot of thylacines were indeed killed by humans from the 1830s onwards. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage clearly states that the decline of thylacines in Tasmania began in the 1830s due to the efforts of sheep farmers and bounty hunters, showing that significant numbers of thylacines were killed by humans during this time period. |
| Q7 | FALSE | There was only one successful attempt to breed a thylacine in captivity, at Melbourne Zoo in 1899 | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about a thylacine being bred successfully in a zoo in Melbourne in 1899. Answer Explanation: The answer FALSE means that several thylacines were not born in zoos during the late 1800s. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage specifically mentions only one successful breeding attempt of a thylacine in 1899 at Melbourne Zoo, not several thylacines being born in zoos during the late 1800s. |
| Q8 | NOT GIVEN | The famous naturalist John Gould foresaw the thylacine’s demise when he published his Mammals of Australia between 1848 and 1863, writing, ‘The numbers of this singular animal will speedily diminish, extermination will have its full sway, and it will then, like the wolf of England and Scotland, be recorded as an animal of the past.’ | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how John Gould, a famous naturalist, predicted the decline and eventual extinction of the thylacine species. Answer Explanation: The answer implies that there is no specific information provided in the passage about whether John Gould's prediction surprised some biologists or not. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage does not mention whether John Gould's prediction surprised some biologists or not. Therefore, without this information being provided, the statement cannot be determined as true or false. |
| Q9 | FALSE | there seems to have been little public pressure to preserve the thylacine, nor was much concern expressed by scientists at the decline of this species in the decades that followed | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage mentions that there was little public pressure or concern from scientists to protect the thylacine species. Answer Explanation: The answer indicates that it is not true that many scientists were worried about the thylacine's possible extinction in the early 1900s. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage clearly states that there was little concern expressed by scientists about the decline of the thylacine species during the mentioned time period. |
| Q10 | NOT GIVEN | In 1914, he was sufficiently concerned about the scarcity of the thylacine to suggest that some should be captured and placed on a small island | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about someone suggesting to capture some thylacines and place them on a small island. Answer Explanation: The answer means that it's not mentioned in the passage whether T.T. Flynn's proposal to rehome captive thylacines on an island was impractical or not. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage does not provide any information about the practicality or outcome of T.T. Flynn's proposal. It only states that he suggested capturing some thylacines and placing them on a small island, without mentioning the success or failure of this proposal. |
| Q11 | FALSE | But it was not until 1929, with the species on the very edge of extinction, that Tasmania’s Animals and Birds Protection Board passed a motion protecting thylacines only for the month of December, which was thought to be their prime breeding season | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how a piece of legislation was passed in 1929 to protect thylacines during their breeding season, which was believed to be in December. Answer Explanation: The answer states that it is FALSE if there were still reasonable numbers of thylacines in existence when the legislation was passed. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage clearly mentions that by 1929, the thylacine species was on the brink of extinction. This indicates that there were not reasonable numbers of thylacines left when the legislation protecting thylacines during their breeding season was passed. |
| Q12 | TRUE | The last known wild thylacine to be killed was shot by a farmer in the north-east of Tasmania in 1930, leaving just captive specimens. Official protection of the species by the Tasmanian government was introduced in July 1936, 59 days before the last known individual died in Hobart Zoo on 7th September, 1936. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the last wild thylacine was killed in 1930, and after that, only captive specimens remained. Answer Explanation: The answer means that from 1930 to 1936, all living thylacines were in captivity. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage confirms that after 1930, there were no known living thylacines in the wild, and captive specimens were the only ones left until the species went extinct in 1936. |
| Q13 | NOT GIVEN | There have been numerous expeditions and searches for the thylacine over the years, none of which has produced definitive evidence that thylacines still exist. The species was declared extinct by the Tasmanian government in 1986. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about many attempts to search for the thylacine, but no evidence has been found about their current existence. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the passage does not mention whether attempts to find living thylacines are now rarely made or not. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage does not provide any information about the frequency of current attempts to find living thylacines. |
