Venus In Transit - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 09 Academic Reading Test 2 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14–26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
Venus in transit
June 2004 saw the first passage, known as a 'transit', of the planet Venus across the face of the Sun in 122 years. Transits have helped shape our view of the whole Universe, as Heather Cooper and Nigel Henbest explain
A On 8 June 2004, more than half the population of the world were treated to a rare astronomical event. For over six hours, the planet Venus steadily inched its way over the surface of the Sun. This 'transit' of Venus was the first since 6 December 1882. On that occasion, the American astronomer Professor Simon Newcomb led a party to South Africa to observe the event. They were based at a girls' school, where – it is alleged – the combined forces of three schoolmistresses outperformed the professionals with the accuracy of their observations.
B For centuries, transits of Venus have drawn explorers and astronomers alike to the four corners of the globe. And you can put it all down to the extraordinary polymath Edmond Halley. In November 1677, Halley observed a transit of the innermost planet, Mercury, from the desolate island of St Helena in the South Pacific. He realised that, from different latitudes, the passage of the planet across the Sun's disc would appear to differ. By timing the transit from two widely-separated locations, teams of astronomers could calculate the parallax angle – the apparent difference in position of an astronomical body due to a difference in the observer's position. Calculating this angle would allow astronomers to measure what was then the ultimate goal: the distance of the Earth from the Sun. This distance is known as the 'astronomical unit' or AU.
C Halley was aware that the AU was one of the most fundamental of all astronomical measurements. Johannes Kepler, in the early 17th century, had shown that the distances of the planets from the Sun governed their orbital speeds, which were easily measurable. But no-one had found a way to calculate accurate distances to the planets from the Earth. The goal was to measure the AU; then, knowing the orbital speeds of all the other planets round the Sun, the scale of the Solar System would fall into place. However, Halley realised that Mercury was so far away that its parallax angle would be very difficult to determine. As Venus was closer to the Earth, its parallax angle would be larger, and Halley worked out that by using Venus it would be possible to measure the Sun's distance to 1 part in 500. But there was a problem: transits of Venus, unlike those of Mercury, are rare, occurring in pairs roughly eight years apart every hundred or so years. Nevertheless, he accurately predicted that Venus would cross the face of the Sun in both 1761 and 1769 – though he didn't survive to see either.
D Inspired by Halley's suggestion of a way to pin down the scale of the Solar System, teams of British and French astronomers set out on expeditions to places as diverse as India and Siberia. But things weren't helped by Britain and France being at war. The person who deserves most sympathy is the French astronomer Guillaume Le Gentil. He was thwarted by the fact that the British were besieging his observation site at Pondicherry in India. Fleeing on a French warship crossing the Indian Ocean, Le Gentil saw a wonderful transit – but the ship's pitching and rolling ruled out any attempt at making accurate observations. Undaunted, he remained south of the equator, keeping himself busy by studying the islands of Mauritius and Madagascar before setting off to observe the next transit in the Philippines. Ironically after travelling nearly 50,000 kilometres, his view was clouded out at the last moment, a very dispiriting experience.
E While the early transit timings were as precise as instruments would allow, the measurements were dogged by the 'black drop' effect. When Venus begins to cross the Sun's disc, it looks smeared not circular – which makes it difficult to establish timings. This is due to diffraction of light. The second problem is that Venus exhibits a halo of light when it is seen just outside the Sun's disc. While this showed astronomers that Venus was surrounded by a thick layer of gases refracting sunlight around it, both effects made it impossible to obtain accurate timings.
F But astronomers laboured hard to analyse the results of these expeditions to observe Venus transits. Johann Franz Encke, Director of the Berlin Observatory, finally determined a value for the AU based on all these parallax measurements: 153,340,000 km. Reasonably accurate for the time, that is quite close to today's value of 149,597,870 km, determined by radar, which has now superseded transits and all other methods in accuracy. The AU is a cosmic measuring rod, and the basis of how we scale the Universe today. The parallax principle can be extended to measure the distances to the stars. If we look at a star in January – when Earth is at one point in its orbit – it will seem to be in a different position from where it appears six months later. Knowing the width of Earth's orbit, the parallax shift lets astronomers calculate the distance.
G June 2004's transit of Venus was thus more of an astronomical spectacle than a scientifically important event. But such transits have paved the way for what might prove to be one of the most vital breakthroughs in the cosmos – detecting Earth-sized planets orbiting other stars.
Questions
Questions 14–17 Matching Information
Reading Passage 2 has seven paragraphs, A-G.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Questions 18–21 Matching Features
Look at the following statements (Questions 18-21) and the list of people below.
Match each statement with the correct person, A, B, C or D.
A. Edmond Halley
B. Johannes Kepler
C. Guillaume Le Gentil
D. Johann Franz Encke
Questions 22–26 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | F | Johann Franz Encke, Director of the Berlin Observatory, finally determined a value for the AU based on all these parallax measurements: 153,340,000 km. Reasonably accurate for the time, that is quite close to today's value of 149,597,870 km, determined by radar, which has now superseded transits and all other methods in accuracy. The AU is a cosmic measuring rod, and the basis of how we scale the Universe today. The parallax principle can be extended to measure the distances to the stars | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that a scientist used parallax to calculate the distance to the Sun (the AU). It also says that this same rule can be used to find out how far away stars are. Answer Explanation: The answer is F because this part of the text gives two different examples of how the parallax rule is used to measure things in space. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because it describes how the parallax principle was used in two ways. First, it was used to find the distance from the Earth to the Sun (called the AU). Second, it explains that the principle can be 'extended'—which means stretched or applied further— to measure 'distances to the stars'. These two points are the 'different ways' the question is looking for. Key words to look for include 'parallax measurements' and 'distances to the stars'. |
| Q15 | D | He was thwarted by the fact that the British were besieging his observation site at Pondicherry in India. Fleeing on a French warship crossing the Indian Ocean, Le Gentil saw a wonderful transit – but the ship’s pitching and rolling ruled out any attempt at making accurate observations. Undaunted, he remained south of the equator, keeping himself busy by studying the islands of Mauritius and Madagascar before setting off to observe the next transit in the Philippines. Ironically after travelling nearly 50,000 kilometres, his view was clouded out at the last moment, a very dispiriting experience | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Le Gentil was stopped by a war, then by a moving ship that made it hard to see clearly, and finally by clouds in the sky that blocked his view after he had traveled a very long way. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph D, which tells a story about an astronomer who tried to see the transit but faced many problems. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Paragraph D because it describes several specific events that stopped Guillaume Le Gentil from making successful observations. For example, it mentions a war (British siege), the movement of a ship (pitching and rolling), and bad weather (clouds). These are all events that prevented or 'thwarted' his goal of recording the transit accurately. |
| Q16 | G | But such transits have paved the way for what might prove to be one of the most vital breakthroughs in the cosmos – detecting Earth-sized planets orbiting other stars | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that these events (transits) help make it possible for scientists to find other planets that are similar in size to Earth around different stars. Answer Explanation: The answer is Paragraph G, which discusses how watching Venus move across the Sun helps scientists find new planets in the future. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is G because the question asks for a statement about possible future findings. Paragraph G mentions that transits have "paved the way" for a very important "breakthrough" in space science. It describes the potential discovery of "Earth-sized planets orbiting other stars" as a result of the knowledge gained from observing transits. |
| Q17 | E | When Venus begins to cross the Sun's disc, it looks smeared not circular – which makes it difficult to establish timings. This is due to diffraction of light. The second problem is that Venus exhibits a halo of light when it is seen just outside the Sun's disc. While this showed astronomers that Venus was surrounded by a thick layer of gases refracting sunlight around it, both effects made it impossible to obtain accurate timings | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Venus looked blurry and had a bright ring around it because of light bending and the planet's gassy atmosphere. These conditions made it so that scientists could not record the exact time the planet moved across the Sun. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph E because it describes natural conditions on Venus and light effects that prevented old scientific tools from getting perfect measurements. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because this paragraph focuses on the 'black drop' effect and the 'halo of light' caused by Venus’s atmosphere. The text explains that these physical phenomena made the planet look blurry ('smeared') or surrounded by light rather than a sharp circle. Because of these specific physical states related to Venus and how light works, astronomers using early instruments found it 'impossible to obtain accurate timings' for the transit, which is exactly what the question is looking for. |
| Q18 | D | Johann Franz Encke, Director of the Berlin Observatory, finally determined a value for the AU based on all these parallax measurements: 153,340,000 km. Reasonably accurate for the time, that is quite close to today's value of 149,597,870 km, determined by radar, which has now superseded transits and all other methods in accuracy | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Johann Franz Encke found a number for the distance between the Earth and the Sun (the AU). Even though we now use a better method called radar, his old calculation was very close to the correct answer. Answer Explanation: The answer is D, Johann Franz Encke. He was a scientist who calculated the distance from the Sun to the Earth using information about how the planet Venus moves. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the passage mentions in paragraph F that Johann Franz Encke used 'parallax measurements' (which come from looking at Venus) to find a value for the 'AU'. The 'AU' or 'astronomical unit' is the distance from the Earth to the Sun. His calculation was described as 'reasonably accurate' (which matches the phrase 'fair degree of accuracy' in the question) because his number was very close to the one scientists use today. |
| Q19 | A | He realised that, from different latitudes, the passage of the planet across the Sun's disc would appear to differ. By timing the transit from two widely-separated locations, teams of astronomers could calculate the parallax angle – the apparent difference in position of an astronomical body due to a difference in the observer's position. Calculating this angle would allow astronomers to measure what was then the ultimate goal: the distance of the Earth from the Sun | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Halley saw how a planet's path across the Sun would look different depending on where you are on Earth. He knew that if groups of scientists timed this from two far-apart places, they could calculate an angle to find the distance between our Earth and the Sun. Answer Explanation: The answer is Edmond Halley because he was the scientist who first realized that timing a planet's crossing of the Sun from different places could help determine how far the Sun is from Earth. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the text describes how Edmond Halley watched Mercury pass in front of the Sun. He understood that scientists could time this event from two different spots on Earth to find a specific angle (the parallax angle). By using this angle, they could finally find the distance between the Earth and the Sun, which was a major goal in science at that time. |
| Q20 | B | Johannes Kepler, in the early 17th century, had shown that the distances of the planets from the Sun governed their orbital speeds, which were easily measurable | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Kepler found a clear link between how far a planet is from the Sun and how quickly it moves around it. Answer Explanation: The answer is B, Johannes Kepler. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the text says that Johannes Kepler showed that a planet's distance from the Sun controls its 'orbital speed'. The phrase 'orbital speed' refers to how fast a planet travels, which determines the time it takes to go around the Sun. This matches the statement about the time taken depending on the distance. |
| Q21 | C | Le Gentil saw a wonderful transit – but the ship's pitching and rolling ruled out any attempt at making accurate observations | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Le Gentil saw the transit while on a boat, but the movement of the ship prevented him from recording any useful scientific information. Answer Explanation: The answer C refers to Guillaume Le Gentil. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the passage describes how Guillaume Le Gentil watched the transit of Venus from a French warship. However, because the ship was moving and shaking on the ocean waves, he could not take the measurements he needed. In the text, the word 'saw' is a synonym for 'witness' used in the statement, and the phrase 'ruled out any attempt at making accurate observations' means he was 'unable to make any calculations.' |
| Q22 | FALSE | In November 1677, Halley observed a transit of the innermost planet, Mercury, from the desolate island of St Helena in the South Pacific Nevertheless, he accurately predicted that Venus would cross the face of the Sun in both 1761 and 1769 – though he didn't survive to see either |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Halley saw Mercury move across the Sun in 1677. It then explains that he correctly guessed when Venus would move across the Sun in the future, but he was no longer alive to watch those events. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the statement says Edmond Halley saw one transit of Venus, but the text says he never saw any. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explains that Halley died before the Venus transits he predicted actually happened. While Halley did see a transit of the planet Mercury in 1677, he only predicted the ones for Venus in 1761 and 1769. Since he 'didn't survive' to see them, he saw zero transits of Venus, not one. Important words to notice are 'observed' (which means watched or saw) and 'didn't survive' (which means he died before it happened). |
| Q23 | FALSE | Ironically after travelling nearly 50,000 kilometres, his view was clouded out at the last moment, a very dispiriting experience | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that after traveling a very long way, clouds prevented him from seeing the event at the most important time. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because Guillaume Le Gentil was unable to watch the second time the planet Venus passed across the Sun. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explains that when Le Gentil tried to watch the second Venus event (the 'next transit') in the Philippines, he failed. Although he traveled a long distance, clouds blocked his vision at the last minute. This means he did not actually 'manage to observe' it. Important terms to look for are 'next transit' (referring to the second one) and 'clouded out' (meaning he could not see it because of the weather). |
| Q24 | TRUE | When Venus begins to cross the Sun's disc, it looks smeared not circular | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the planet Venus starts its journey across the Sun, its round shape looks messy or out of focus instead of a perfect circle. Answer Explanation: The answer means it is correct that Venus looks out of shape or blurry when it begins to move across the front of the Sun. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because Paragraph E describes the 'black drop' effect. It says that as Venus starts moving over the Sun's surface (the 'disc'), it looks 'smeared' instead of 'circular.' In this context, 'smeared' and 'not circular' are synonyms for the word 'distorted' used in the question. |
| Q25 | NOT GIVEN | While this showed astronomers that Venus was surrounded by a thick layer of gases refracting sunlight around it, both effects made it impossible to obtain accurate timings | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that scientists saw a ring of light around Venus, which proved that the planet is covered by a lot of gas. However, it does not explain if those scientists thought the gas was dangerous for people to breathe. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage does not say whether or not the early astronomers thought the atmosphere of Venus was poisonous. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the text describes how astronomers found a 'thick layer of gases' (an atmosphere) around Venus, but it does not mention if they believed these gases were toxic. To mark this statement as TRUE or FALSE, the reading would need to contain specific information about what the astronomers thought the air on Venus was like. |
| Q26 | TRUE | The parallax principle can be extended to measure the distances to the stars. If we look at a star in January – when Earth is at one point in its orbit – it will seem to be in a different position from where it appears six months later. Knowing the width of Earth's orbit, the parallax shift lets astronomers calculate the distance | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the parallax method helps measure how far stars are from Earth. It says that a star appears to move slightly when viewed from different sides of Earth's path around the Sun, and this movement helps scientists calculate the distance. Answer Explanation: The answer 'TRUE' means the text says that scientists can use the parallax method to find the distance between Earth and far-away stars. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the last paragraph, which explains that the parallax principle is not just for objects in our solar system; it can also be used for stars. It mentions that because Earth moves around the Sun, a star looks like it is in a different spot every six months. This shift in position allows astronomers to find out how far away the star is. |
