IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
the best cite
Band 8
Nowadays, many people believe that learning English is more important than learning local languages, which may be at risk of disappearing if they are not preserved. While I agree that English plays a crucial role in today’s globalised world, it is equally important to protect and promote local languages.
I believe everyone should learn English as it is a language spoken around the world. As a result, it has become easier to travel to foreign countries and communicate efficiently without the need to learn their language. It is a common language for tourism and business, so people from different countries and with different mother tongues can exchange using English. This has allowed people to be connected to each other and to have access to foreign culture and knowledge, thanks to this lingua franca that English has become.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that governments and people around the world should ensure the survival of local languages. Indeed, these languages carry the heritage and culture of the countries, and they might lose their rich legacy, as well as their own identity. For example, parents should teach their local language to their children, and the latter could have some subjects in school taught in their local language. That way, they could not lose touch with it.
In conclusion, I believe that it is crucial to learn to speak English in the world we live in to be able to travel abroad and have access to other countries’ culture. However, I also think that it is our responsibility to keep our local languages alive so we do not forget our history and cultural identity.
Band 7
Nowadays, individuals believe that competition is necessary at school, workplace, and in normal life. While others argue that individuals should be more supportive and avoid competition. I firmly concur that cooperation between individuals is more paramount as it creates a friendly environment where everyone feels secured and valued.
On the one hand, competition at educational institutes, workplaces, and in everyday life enhances individual’s progress because a competitive atmosphere influences people to work harder than their colleagues, which eventually improves resilience, diligence, and progress of all the fellows in a group. For example, these days, many big companies are using the reward system which gives bonuses to a limited number of workers with exceptional performance as a result to pursue this reward many workers do overtime to get ahead of their colleagues. Therefore, a healthy competition among people not only improves individual’s performance but it also develops a productive workforce.
On the other hand, some people support the notion that individuals should be cooperative and try to steer away from competition. This is due to the fact that in a competitive environment people with lesser progress and skills often feel insecure and this sense of inferiority lowers their self-esteem, eventually, disrupting their performance. For instance, schools and colleges in Australia have banned disclosing their students’ grades in front of the whole class to eradicate this feeling of competition. As a result, all the students feel equally valued, and even if a student is weak in studies other students will assist him, thus creating a sense of empathy.
To recapitulate, while some people perceive competition as a good thing, I concur that a cooperative environment is much more important as it allows people to encourage and support each other. Hence, in such an environment, everyone will feel secured and valued.
Nowadays, it is widely believed that access to clean water is a basic human right to maintain livelihood, and some argue that governments should provide it free of charge. I strongly agree with this statement, because free access to clean water may reduce social inequality, and lack of water can lead to problems with poor sanitation and life-threatening diseases.
Firstly, free access to water supply can reduce issues with inequality, especially for low-income countries. In many countries, wealthy individuals can easily afford to pay for water, while poor households often struggle to cover even basic utilities. As a result, many of them are more likely to face unequal problems. For example, in many developing countries, low-income families spend a significant amount of income on water, while wealthier individuals can easily afford limitless access without financial struggles.
Secondly, access to clean water is crucial for surviving and treating some life-threatening illnesses, such as infection and poor sanitation. Without a reliable source of safe water, people can face serious health risks. This issue is the primary source of critical problems with well-being and overall health in low-income countries, where many individuals are not able to pay for basic livelihood. For example, many African cities have a problem with free and clean water supply, which leads to unsanitary conditions and the inability to treat serious injuries.
In conclusion, access to clean water is a basic human right to maintain livelihood and governments must ensure that every home has access to a free and clear water supply, because providing access to water is essential to reduce social inequality and problems with life-threatening diseases.
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Science is believed to aim at improving people’s lives. To some extent I agree with this view, but I also think that balance should be priority.
Main reason for prioritizing science’s aim at improving people’s lives is that science improves people’s lives by advancing healthcare. In other words, they provide humankind with developing new medicines as well as vaccines. Stemming from those innovations, now, people tend to live more than ever before, although a cure has not yet been found in all diseases. Hence, as a result of science, people are living longer. Another primary reason why the role of science is essential is that it improves daily life through technological innovations and modern conveniences. That is, rising technology enhanced the way people communicating with each other, solving problems with their devices. To give an example, if someone lives the far away, they do not have to purchase tickets to meet with each other, the reason is that, with applications such as Telegram, Instagram and Facebook, they are able to see each other in a screen. Thus, they are going to safe their money, being keep in touch through those apps easily as well. Consequently, Innovations that science made is now helping people a lot, not least because being able to see each other online platforms.
However, it is also worth mentioning that, science should not focus solely on improving human conveniences because it can harm nature. Certain innovations, including but not limited to – chemicals, industrial processes, or energy technologies – may damage ecosystems and pollute air, even water. For instance, if science halt caring other factors, not long after those new updating chemicals might influence on animals and on the environment. So, whenever science stop seeking other fields, and aiming to people’s lives only, it may contribute to damage to the environment and even lead to the extinction of animals.
To sum up, although improving human life should be one of the main aims of science, it is also essential for science to consider other fields, such as environmental protection and animal welfare.
It is often argued that the major purpose of science is to improve life quality. I completely agree with this view because humanity has always sought to achieve a more convenient lifestyle with the aid of modern technologies.
Firstly, one key reason is that the development of science improves the quality of medicine. Genetic technologies, organ transplantation, and new drug discoveries are helping to defeat diseases and increase life expectancy. There would not have been depopulation if scholars had more appropriate appliances and opportunities to save people’s lives in the past. Medicine development helps humanity to evolve quickly, reducing the emergence of new diseases and viruses.
Secondly, another important point is technological progress. Recently, scholars invented artificial intelligence, which makes life easier for everyone nowadays. Only after scientists created the first computer did they understand all the benefits of this investigation. Therefore, humanity puts the development of computer technology top of mind now and sees a future in it. Vehicles will help people not to spend time on household chores; instead, individuals can save time for something more important and useful for them.
However, some people argue that with the help of advancing science, people may maintain Earth’s vegetation and the biodiversity of animal species. Humanity cannot live without flora and fauna; therefore, it is essential to try not to harm nature and devote resources not only to improving individuals’ lives but also to helping our planet.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that humanity always strives to simplify their lives, and this is one of the main reasons for science development. Although, it is crucial not to forget about our environment, which constantly deteriorates due to people’s actions. The best way to solve this is to find a balance between personal needs and ecological preservation.
Band 9
8.5
8.5
In modern times, children are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends. Why has this change occurred? Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home?
In contemporary society, children tend to spend more time with peers rather than their parents. I believe that this change is caused by the development of digital platforms and parents’ confusion about children’s hobbies. However, I think that children should not be forced to spend more time at home, as socialising with peers is very important for children.
This trend happened because of the intensive cultivation of digital platforms, such as social media and online games. As the industry of online programs developed significantly in recent years, more children started to play mobile games and communicate using Instagram and Snapchat. Another reason why this occurred is that parents do not really understand their children’s hobbies and activities. As a result of technological advancement, it may be difficult for family members to communicate with each other. For example, numerous individuals in England highlight that it is difficult for them to use online platforms, like Snapchat and TikTok, which are very popular among the youth.
However, I think that youngsters should not be forced to spend more time with their parents, as communicating with friends is crucial for them. As our society requires socialising with others, limiting interactions with peers may have a deleterious impact on children. Moreover, forced communication can make relationships even worse. This is because children value free will and it is important give them this freedom of communication. For example, many parents have emphasised that their relationships with children improved when they has stopped forcing them to spend more time at home.
In conclusion, I think that this trend is caused by the cultivation of virtual platforms and parents’ difficulties using them. However, I think that children should not be forced to spend more time with their families, as interacting with friends is vital for children.
Eating too much junk food has caused an increase in the population with health conditions in some parts of the world; thus, a higher tax needs to be implemented on this type of food. This essay strongly agrees with this statement because this problem is costing health services more money, and also imposing a higher tax will decrease the demand.
Obesity-related illnesses cost billions of pounds to health services. People with these types of illnesses are more likely to visit their GP more frequently than others, which causes more strain to the health facilities. For example, The National Health Services in England stated last year that over 12 million people suffered from obesity-related conditions like hypertension and diabetes as a result of bad eating habits, which led them to prescribe very costly medication like Monjaro. These medications cost almost 1 billion last year, which is quite high to spend for something that is preventable.
Implementing a higher tax on unhealthy food will indeed lower the demand and result in people feeling good and fit. Populations who eat more veggies, protein, and fruits are found to have a lower risk of getting some weight-related health conditions. For example, The UAE implemented a sugar tax in 2019, and this showed a significant reduction in overweight people and more healthy individuals due to less consumption of sugary snacks.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that obesity and other weight-related conditions have increased recently among many populations due to eating a poor diet, and I believe that this is very costly for the health system, causing strains, and a higher tax will definitely reduce the consumption of this type of food.
The upward trend in remote work has gained attention since companies are better off hiring workers from developing countries because the labor costs are lower. On the other hand, some present counterarguments that this could lead to inequality, exploitation and neglect in developed countries. I believe working remotely and outsourcing the workforce isn’t a bad idea if done properly, and I aim to present both standpoints in detail in this essay.
Nowadays, remote working emerges as an ideal solution, so alluring that companies are undeniably attracted to the idea in order to cut costs and boost productivity. In order to accomplish this goal, the companies go the extra mile and employ workers from developing nations. This idea reiterates how affordable and less strenuous outsourcing is. For instance, countries like India and Pakistan have one of the youngest population diversity in the world, and cost of living in these countries are much less than the developed ones. These possible advantages are very compelling for the companies who are looking to grow their workforce effectively.
Conversely, others argue that these practices aren’t very transparent since they lack proper information about what the conditions for the workers are. Ideally, one would expect fair working conditions and equal rights for people that were hired from developing countries, but that is unfortunately not the case. Reports of workers being abused and getting paid less than what they were signed up for, or even not getting paid at all in remote work is a prominent issue in developed countries. Furthermore, there is evidence of workers being forced to work overtime without additional pay. In addition to this some people believe that outsourcing the workforce might impede local talent from emerging, since the locals would get used to foreigners doing the work for them, and that may ultimately inhibit talent acquisition of the locals.
To sum up, even though expanding the workforce with the necessary means is a good idea, I firmly believe that such practices should be done only when needed and in moderation. I also believe protecting and looking after the foreign workers should have a bigger priority on the agenda of the developed countries. band 7