IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
Some persons argue that young generation should follow the traditions of their community and others state that they should be free to behave as individuals. Despite both sides have arguments for their points of view, I believe that youngsters should be free to choose the way how they behave.
Primarily, advocates for following traditions believe that this trend can save their national identity. In many diverse countries, the elderly people trying to implement traditions and customs of their country into upcoming generation’s personalities. They persuaded that this approach can save their uniqueness and national differences in a long-term perspective; in addition, they support initiatives for cultural events and help organize them in various directions to emphasize the importance of their traditions. Another significant factor for this group of people is blockade of external fashion and mentality. From their perspective, foreign fashion and mentality can seriously change their culture and lead to poorer condition in country; furthermore, they firmly believe that traditions of their particular counrty can prevent their society from peril of culture extinction.
On other hand, supporters of freedom for youngsters underline the meaningfulness of individualism. They state, that every single human can behave as they want and this approach have beneficial effect for versatility of society. In this way, publicity can benefit from various types of personalities, approaches and unique styles. Moreover, this trend is supported by humanism and is in line with ethic norms; in today’s world everyone should be able to behave as they want. One more crucial aspect for this people is their country’s development. From their perspective, individuality is one of the key elements in particular country’s improvement, new generations can invent new technologies, rewatch the laws and generally enhance the quality of life in region, and permission to behave as they want will be extremely beneficial for their worldview and experience.
In conclusion, despite the fact that both sides have directions to follow and arguments for support such as, saving of national identity and maintaining of culture for people advocating following of traditions; and benefit for universal community and development of a country for supporters of freddom for young people. I am sure, that everyone should be able to behave and impress themselves as they want. This approach is better for the modern world and can be beneficial in multiple ways.
That was totally unexpected
Band 9:
Topic: With increasing automation in the workplace, some believe that creative skills like art and music will become less important for individuals, while others argue that they will be even more valuable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Essay: As automation has rapidly transformed the workplace, regular or even thought-demanding tasks are increasingly performed by machines. In recent decades, this phenomenon has sparked a debate about the fate of creative abilities such as art and music. While some argue that the significance of artistic capabilities will fade away in the contemporary economy, I firmly believe that these skills still play an indispensable role for individuals in upcoming years.
It is evident that the widespread popularity of the Internet in recent years allows creators to gather and personalize references taken from available platforms. This offers efficiency in producing artworks, instead of dedicating time to manifesting inspiration and considering materials. Pinterest, a well-known website where thousands of worldwide artists display their products, has predominantly become a source of ideas, facilitating the process of generating magnificent and mesmerizing pieces. Further boosting this, applications operated by artificial intelligence technology, which has gained significant recognition over the years, are now capable of creating instant projects, commencing from illustrations to presentations. With this assistance, employees and entertainers, regardless of their profession, can produce an extremely large number of results within a short period of time, amplifying the obsolescence of exploiting mere personal imagination.
On the contrary, frequent exclusion of cultural and ethical values in AI-generated products, together with the deficiency of distinctiveness and authenticity in general, has raised increasing concerns. Although productivity is indeed promoted, scarcity of genuine emotions, original imaginations, and cultural sensitivity can discourage the results from recognition, while at the same time precipitate habituation of the creators into morally depraved patterns of generating art. Human aspects, such as giving contextual judgements or crafting metaphoric products, offer a sense of uniqueness, which cannot be replicated by any, even top-notch, machinery. Therefore, a broad imagination holds permanent significance, even a powerful advantage in the competitive labor market that prioritizes competent creative individuals. In such an autonomic economy, capabilities and involvement of humans are extremely emphasized.
In conclusion, the topic involving the current importance of creativity remains controversial. Modernities can now offer optimizations that the human workforce used to take responsibilities for; however, risks of offending and disregarding cultural and ethical values, in return, accentuate the position of pure imagination. With what was discussed above, I strongly state that creative skills play an even more substantial role in this era.
Leave a Reply: This section allows visitors to submit public comments.
Privacy Assured: The text indicates that your email address will not be published publicly.
Required Fields: Items marked with an asterisk (*) must be filled out before submitting.
Good and helpful
Band 7 a very easy and simple wording
In this era of digital technology, movies play a crucial role in every individual’s life. Some people argue that watching a movie in a cinema is essential. However, others suggest that it is better to watch movies at home rather than in the theater. I partially agree with this statement, because both have their own importance. I will elaborate on all the reasons with relevant examples, as well as give my own opinion in a further paragraph.
On the one hand, some people prefer to watch movies in a cinema because it has many advantages. Firstly, cinemas provide a big screen where we can easily watch films. It also helps people to stay connected with each other. It also provides an enjoyable environment where everyone can easily watch movies and also do many entertainment activities. For instance, while watching a movie, cinemas provide various kinds of food for eating; they mainly provide different kinds of snacks like popcorn, noodles, etc. Moreover, you can easily watch movies with your family and friends and enjoy it very much. Furthermore, most old cinemas reflect our culture, tradition, as well as history.
On the other hand, watching movies at home has many outstanding advantages. It saves your cost and energy. In addition, you can easily watch any kind of movie with the help of the internet. In particular, by using a smartphone and computer, you can watch every type of movie at any time, and you can also easily pause or stop your movie if the content is irrelevant. In addition, at home there is no noise or disturbance. Additionally, some movie content is very negative, so if you want to watch this type of movie, it is better to watch it at home and alone. It gives you full privacy and also focus.
In conclusion, watching movies at the cinema helps you to watch any new film in advance, because new movies are first released at the cinema. While watching movies at home also plays a key role, because you can watch them with proper concentration and without any break. So, my honest opinion is that both are important, because both have extraordinary qualities.
Band 8.5
Parents in some countries prefer homeschooling to the traditional way of educating children. The upsides of homeschooling can include learning at one’s own pace and less peer pressure, but these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks, such as a lack of social interactions and negative impacts on mental health.
One advantage of studying at home for children is the opportunity to master subjects at their own pace. Many students who attend school tend to gain knowledge according to a fixed curriculum and schedule in groups of 15 to 20 students, while children at home may have a chance to learn at a faster or slower pace depending on their learning ability. This often means that children can understand subjects more effectively and avoid falling behind. A reduced influence of peers can be another benefit. Students who are surrounded by their friends at school on a daily basis might have potential risks to their social and moral development. For example, my cousin has been experiencing lower scores than before, as his friends are encouraging him to play computer games and try cigarettes, impacting him in a negative way. Hence, homeschooled children are less exposed to such peer influence and are more likely to maintain appropriate behavior.
However, the disadvantages of educating children at home are far greater. One major drawback is the inability to interact with others. Children who are taught by their parents are more likely to experience social isolation, which can lead to poor communication skills. Children at school mainly work in group activities, which encourages them to form opinions and learn how to engage in meaningful conversation with people by discussing broad ideas with their classmates. Children who are homeschooled, on the other hand, may lack the ability to express opinions and views freely. As a result, they may struggle to communicate effectively in social or professional settings later in life. Moreover, homeschooled children are more subject to different mental health issues, such as anxiety, depression, and especially low self-esteem. People who interact less with others may develop social anxiety and feel uncomfortable in face-to-face situations, which can also pose a risk to reduced confidence and make them doubt their social abilities in the future.
In conclusion, teaching children at home may entail several benefits for them, such as personalized learning and reduced peer influence. However, the drawbacks are much more significant, including less interaction and impacts on mental health problems.
hi, is this topic that might appear on the exam this april, or is it just random topic?
Band 7.5
Nowadays, as the global demand for fossil fuels has significantly increased, industries where gas and oil are produced are located in uninhabited regions. I firmly believe that the benefits of fossil fuels can outweigh the drawbacks of poisoning the natural landscapes.
On the one hand, there are some detrimental sides to this point. Firstly, if the number of gas and oil factories increases, it can actually pose harsh risks to the environment. For example, factory emissions release into the atmosphere and, as a result, it can lead to global warming, which is still a main unsolved issue. Secondly, since the amount of carbon dioxide accelerates into the atmosphere, it causes air pollution; in turn, this factor can cause health problems. To make that more clear, people can intake these detrimental gasses, which can cause heart diseases and respiratory illnesses. Therefore, there is a disagreement about increasing these resources.
On the other hand, I personally concur that as oil and gas are considered the cornerstone of the global economy, they are beneficial in some ways due to certain reasons. The gas and oil industry can play a pivotal role in the economy in terms of producing energy. According to statistics, 23% of gas and 27% of oil can be allocated to manufacture energy over the world. Furthermore, these natural sources can be used to produce chemical products, bottles, plastics and synthetic materials, which are main needs of human consumption. On top of that, the gas and oil industry is a dominant provider of transportation, because our cars run with gas and methane, as well as public transport with diesel fuel, and planes with kerosene. Hence, having a gas and oil industry can not only supply energy, but also cover various areas of use in chemistry, transport, and production.
In conclusion, although installing fossil fuel industries in remote areas can be dangerous – air pollution, global warming, and human diseases – I firmly claim that its advantages – energy supply and production – cannot be overlooked.
the best cite
Band 8
Nowadays, many people believe that learning English is more important than learning local languages, which may be at risk of disappearing if they are not preserved. While I agree that English plays a crucial role in today’s globalised world, it is equally important to protect and promote local languages.
I believe everyone should learn English as it is a language spoken around the world. As a result, it has become easier to travel to foreign countries and communicate efficiently without the need to learn their language. It is a common language for tourism and business, so people from different countries and with different mother tongues can exchange using English. This has allowed people to be connected to each other and to have access to foreign culture and knowledge, thanks to this lingua franca that English has become.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that governments and people around the world should ensure the survival of local languages. Indeed, these languages carry the heritage and culture of the countries, and they might lose their rich legacy, as well as their own identity. For example, parents should teach their local language to their children, and the latter could have some subjects in school taught in their local language. That way, they could not lose touch with it.
In conclusion, I believe that it is crucial to learn to speak English in the world we live in to be able to travel abroad and have access to other countries’ culture. However, I also think that it is our responsibility to keep our local languages alive so we do not forget our history and cultural identity.