IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
Nowadays, many people are concerned about the traffic congestion all over the world. Money should be spent on railways rather than roads by governments. From my perspective I disagree with this statement.
Although railways are essential for travel, roads are more convenient to reach destinations on time. If roads were better funded, fewer people would prefer trains. Nowadays governments fail to maintain highways properly, where local residents are badly affected by traffic. Therefore, governments should invest in roads because most people go to the office by road rather than train, as a result they face traffic congestion. Another reason is that, goods are transported by roads rather than railways which boosts the national economy.
On the other hand, the railway system is crucial for long journeys, although roads are used by short journeys all over the world. If governments invest large amounts in train systems it may damage the economy because our financial conditions depend on the fuels and electricity, which are used in hybrid vehicles and normal vehicles. In addition most people prefer train on special days such as, weekends because they belong to another city and they have to go home to meet their parents on special days. For example, weekdays most people go to their work on private transport, which is very convenient for them. Therefore, highways should well structured and well-developed all over the country.
In conclusion, roads should be well- developed for short travel rather than railways because most people use highways for daily life. Although trains are convenient for one province to another provence destinations. roads are beneficals for locals in their life and their drainage system which flow on roads. Therefore gevernments should spend money on roads rather than railways.
people hold different views about whether career oriented individuals like nurses, doctors, teachers, engineers should stay in the place where they learn that professional development skill or they have that freedom to select place for their job or living. Even though in first point of view they can contribute their skill and knowledge to their own country but I concur with later opinion because it respect personal opinion.
Advocates of this perspective argue that skilled worker ought to play a role in the nation that provided their training there must be several reason behind it .One of the reason is, it can help to develop the country in both internationally and economically. For instance, in the past days Bangladesh was neither a famous nor an advanced nation but the number of accomplished individuals in that state is steadily rising day by day and now this country is very well known to everyone as a modern Bangladesh. Moreover, future children will be better trained in their own homeland. Furthermore, the country`s citizens no longer need to hire expertise from abroad.
However, proponents of the other side claim that citizens can choose to work in any nation they desire. Multiple factor contribute to this ,one major factor is they can easily get many facilities such as better career opportunities,quality lifestyle,higher salaeris and accesse to advance technology,which may not available in their home country.For example ,one of my cousin who lives in united states enjoys better amenities than my other brothers and sisters,she has had many chance to travel different countries because of her job.Beside wroking abroad allows professionals gain expousure to international standerds,which enhance their skill and make them more competitive in the global job market.
In sum up, while it is understandable that for countries improvement there must be need trained ones but we have to also respect individuals opinion as well. In my opinion we should let people choose whatever they aim about.
In the modern world, more and more people change their place of living in the hope of living better and having more benefits in the future after graduating from their mother country.
Some people put forward the view that some fields of work, like those of doctors and engineers, should continue working in the country where they got their degree.
While others believe that it is a personal choice of every person, and they are allowed to work all around the world.
I tend to agree with the statement that people should be free to choose a country in which to live, despite their education, and in this essay, I will support it with important arguments and examples.
First of all, medicine and engineering are international fields, and the only difference is language.
A good example of this could be that particular diseases have the same treatment protocols.
Secondly, engineering jobs require the same materials or tools for their work, or every country even has an alternative analog of them.
A classic example of this could be that to create a technical plan, pictures, or choose special materials, it is required to graduate from the same courses.
Turning to the other side of the argument, the opportunity to leave a country after graduation and training can have a negative impact on the government level.
For instance, a government provides funds for education, that these people will continue working in the country they studied.
To sum up, although some support the idea that doctors and engineers should continue their practise in the same country where they got their degree, I personally believe that it a personal choice where to live, and this right should be protected.
In recent decades, wearable technology has rapidly transformed and become a common part of our daily lifestyle. Devices such as smartwatches and fitness trackers are now widely used to monitor health conditions and manage daily activities. While these devices provide clear benefits for users, they also have several drawbacks that must be taken into account.
One of the main advantages of wearable technology is its positive impact on health awareness and lifestyle improvement. Wearable devices can monitor heart rate, step count, sleep patterns, and other health indicators, allowing users to better understand their physical condition. For example, a smartwatch may remind users to stand or move after a long period of inactivity and encourage regular exercise. Some advanced devices can even detect abnormal heart rhythms, which can prevent serious medical issues through early intervention. Additionally, wearable technology improves convenience for our daily activities. For instance, these allow users to receive calls, messages, and reminders directly on their wrist, which can save time and reduce overdependence on smartphones.
Despite these advantages, wearable technology also has several disadvantages. One major concern is inaccurate data, as these devices may not accurately read the actual calories burned, or sleep quality may not always be reliable. This can lead to incorrect assumptions about one’s health. Privacy is another serious issue, since wearable devices store sensitive personal information that could be exposed to data breaches or misused by companies. Furthermore, the cost of high-quality devices is quite high, making them less accessible for some individuals. There is also the risk of overreliance, where users trust smart technology more than their own judgement or professional medical advice.
In conclusion, wearable technology provides valuable support for health monitoring and daily organization, offering convenience and motivation for a healthier lifestyle. However, limitations of data accuracy, privacy, cost, and dependence mean that these devices should be used with caution and seen as helpful tools rather than essential or fully reliable solutions.
band 8.5:
The number of debates regarding the benefits and drawbacks of competition in work, school, and daily life has increased over the years. Considering all sides, I favour the benefits of competition.
Regarding the benefits of competition, firstly, it explicitly shows a person the areas for improvement with no sugarcoating or fluff, which in turn allows one to improve in those areas. Secondly, many researchers have stated that a considerable amount of competition improves the productivity of all team members, compared to when it is neglected. For instance, competition in China is considered to be the highest around the world, not only in academics, but also at work and in everyday life. Data on the internet shows that China is a country with a high GDP per capita, suggesting that an average person earns a lot compared to other countries.
On the other hand, competition may hurt a person if either the amount is too much to handle or one can’t handle it properly. In the first case, competition may lead to anxiety, which decreases the productivity of a person. Moreover, in extreme cases, absurd amounts of competition may lead to mental health issues over time. For example, students in China report being the most stressed among students around the world, suggesting that the amount of homework is excessive. South Korea can be another example of excessive competition, where people work overtime, and some who can’t handle it turn to a ‘suicide bridge’.
In conclusion, while competition may be stress-inducing and hurtful in extreme cases, it can be used to one’s advantage if learnt to manage properly. I think that competition’s benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
it helped me improve what was wrong with the short stories I write for fun
One the one hand, many believe that spending excessively on special occasions is stressful and waste of money.The primary reason is that it can disturbs families saving funds. When individuals allocate a great amount of money on special occasions, it may lead to struggle to manage their financials. For example, it has been observed that a considerable proportion of people creates instability of their income by spending theft money and indulge in debt easily. As a result, such spending is often stressful for them.
.
Band: 8.0
It is true that e-mail has brought benefits to the development of professional and social connection. While there are some drawbacks, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are some aspects of e-mail, principally, lack of personal interaction, which raises cause for concern. E-mails do not allow face-to-face communication, which can reduce emotional connection and cause misunderstandings. In addition, e-mails are associated with security risks, such as hacking and phishing, which may cause loss of personal and professional information. For instance, some data about company security can be stolen by hackers, whereas employers share this information via e-mail.
On the other hand, despite such grave issues, these are not insurmountable and must be
considered against the advantages of the progress of communication. Firstly, e-mails allow for fast and effective communication in long-distance relationships and partnerships. It provides a comfortable area for people to connect with each other quickly and solve their problems easily. Secondly, digital touch has an environmentally friendly side, which paves the way for a decline in paper consumption. Thanks to this, a decrease in environmental damage may be observed.
In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of e-mail for both personal and
professional connection are greater than the drawbacks, serious though these are.
topic: Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Band: 9.0
In this day and age, contemporary attention has been placed on whether to learn a language in spite of the omnipresence of translation tools on the internet. While no one can deny the convenience of available translation apps, I firmly believe that learning a language offers a myriad of benefits, far outweighing total dependence on translation software.
Advocates of translation gadgets may argue that they are extremely convenient for non-native speakers to exchange ideas with native speakers. For example, an American traveler to Japan can talk to the indigenous people regarding their wishes so that language barriers are no longer a major concern; therefore, enjoying every journey to other countries to experience new things, like cuisine, scenery, landscape, etc., might be much more fulfilling, without much language hindrance. Language tools, although they might be effective in translating, may sometimes produce incorrect translations, being time-consuming for both target listeners and users if the speaker’s voice is not fully captured repeatedly, especially in a noisy environment. Translation tools, therefore, may occasionally cause frustration for people, or even prevent users from having a deep conversation with foreigners in certain cases.
On the other hand, there are some stronger reasons to support the idea that learning a foreign language should be encouraged. First, bilingual or multilingual individuals can make friends around the world and open their horizons by gaining insights into the finest values of that nation. With language ability, they may even broaden their career prospects in certain cases by becoming an interpreter or a language teacher, or working for their dream company in another country. In many studies, language learners have a higher level of cognitive ability than monolinguals, making their brains more neuroplastic and reducing the rate of contracting Alzheimer’s disease. In the business landscape, individuals with language proficiency would be able to identify linguistic tricks in contracts, reducing the risks of potential financial losses, fostering healthier business cooperation, and creating growth and prosperity for business partners and the country as a whole. Thus, being multilingual is ideal as this provides many worthwhile advantages.
In conclusion, although some positive impacts of translation software on users are undeniable, I firmly believe that learning a foreign language provides more appealing benefits. Governments, I suppose, should sponsor students, especially those in underprivileged areas, so learning languages is accessible to all, creating an egalitarian society.
BAND 8.5
In many parts of the world, people are facing hunger despite a lot of progress in agriculture. I think poverty, inequality, and poor government policies are the root causes of this concern, and that through better regime planning and poverty reduction programmes, this issue can be tackled.
There are various factors contributing to this issue. First of all, poverty is to blame, as people without any money are not able to purchase food and, in turn, suffer from hunger. Take the example of Nigeria, where during the economic crisis of 2008, poverty increased, giving rise to starvation. Thus, poverty is the driving force in this regard.
Secondly, people suffer from inequality in every corner of the globe. The rich are becoming richer, and poor people are living below the poverty line. Needy citizens are unable to reach even the basic facilities of life just because authoritative persons stock all the things to sell them at higher rates, and in return, underprivileged residents suffer from malnutrition.
Last but not least, poor regime strategies are the main reasons for a rapid rise in this trouble, as weak laws and regulations lead to hunger. For instance, a survey was conducted in Nepal, and the results were shocking. According to the survey’s report, it is expected that starvation will rise threefold by the year 2029, just because of a substandard leadership approach. Hence, a weak executive system gives rise to hunger.
However, there are multiple solutions available to solve this problem. The primary solution I believe would be to start poverty reduction programmes, as these will help needy people to have access to food. Moreover, by improving the government system, hunger can be banished from the world, as strong laws and regulations will help in this regard. In addition to this, equal opportunities should be provided to every person, as it will erase hunger.
To sum up, although poverty, inequality, and bad authoritative strategies are widespread in the world, I suppose that through an improved regime approach and poverty reduction programmes, and providing equal opportunities to everyone, this issue can be curtailed.