IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
It is a common belief that students should dedicate all their time and attention to their main subjects to ensure professional success. However, I strongly believe that students should explore different subjects in addition to their core curriculum because it fosters creative thinking and enhances adaptability in the modern workforce.
Firstly, learning diverse subjects helps students develop creative thinking. To elaborate, when students engage with disciplines outside their main field, they are exposed to different methodologies and perspectives that they would not encounter otherwise. For instance, a recent study conducted on university graduates revealed that those who studied interdisciplinary courses were 30% more likely to propose innovative solutions in their workplace compared to those who focused solely on one subject. This suggests that a broader academic scope signifincantly boosts intellectual flexibility.
On top of that, expanding one’s academic horizon enhances adaptability in the rapidly changing job market. Additionally, modern employers increasingly value versatile employees who can connect disparate ideas and solve complex, multifaceted problems. One particular study, for example, shows that companies prefer candidates with a wide range of knowledge, as they are better equipped to handle unexpected challenges in the 21st-century workforce. Therefore, acquiring knowledge beyond one’s major is a strategic advantage for career longevity.
In conclusion, while focusing on one’s main subject provides a necessary professional foundation, the benefits of exploring different subjects-namely creative thinking and career adaptability-clearly support my view. For these reasons, it is evident that a well-rounded education is superior to a narrow, singular focus.
It is a common belief that the responsibility of cultivating social values in children rests with their parents. However, there is a more compelling argument that schools are the optimal environment for teaching children how to be good members of society. In my opinion, while schools provide a necessary framework for social interaction, the fundamental values of a good citizen are primarily cultivated within the family.
On the one hand, proponents of school-based education argue that educational institutions provide a structured environment that mirrors the complexities of society. To illustrate, schools bring together children from diverse backgrounds, which necessitates the development of essential social skills such as cooperation, conflict resolution, and tolerance. For example, research has demonstrated that students who participate in group projects and extracurricular activities in school settings are more likely to develop a objective sense of civic duty and social responsibility compared to those who do not.
Nevertheless, I advocate the view that the family remains the cornerstone of moral education. While schools can teach the mechanics of being a citizen, such as following rules and working in teams, the emotional intelligence and more compass required to be a “good” member of society are built through the intimate guidance of parents. For instance, a recent study revealed that children who observe and internalize their parents’ ethical behaviors, such as empathy, honesty, and respect for others, are significantly more likely to integrate these virtues into their own characteristics. In fact, these domestic lessons serve as the foundation upon which all future social interactions are built.
In conclusion, while it is apparent that schools play a vital role in expanding a child’s social horizons and teaching the practicalities of civic life, it is undeniable that the primary responsibility for cultivating the core values that define a good member of society rests with the parents. A collaborative approach, where both spheres reinforce these values, is ultimately the most effective way to nurture responsible future citizens.
Band 8.5
It is often argued that children should follow the traditions of their society because it is highly beneficial for the community as a whole. However, others believe that young people should have the freedom to make their own choices.
In my opinion, I believe that a balance between these two perspectives is necessary: traditions provide the key to living a beneficial life since they are the way that our ancestors followed, while individual freedom allows young people to choose what kind of life they want. Thus, both complement each other.
On the one hand, there are clear reasons why some people support the idea that kids should follow traditions. This is mainly because it gives them a clear approach and steps to build a healthy society, which helps individuals in their daily lives. Examples of this include table manners and Christmas celebrations. As a result, this can lead to a highly positive outcome for the community in the future.
On the other hand, there are also strong arguments for giving young people the freedom to behave as individuals. The main reason behind this point of view is that it develops the personalities of children by encouraging creativity and independence. For instance, it allows kids to create their own ideas and take responsibility at an early age. Consequently, this proves to be more effective for their future.
In conclusion, while there are good arguments on both sides regarding whether young people should follow traditions or be free to behave as individuals, I firmly believe that both work well together.
Band 6.5
In this contemporary era, traveling to other countries has become easier; however, some people have decided to cut down the frequency of times to fly in a year or even stop flying. In my opinion, I believe that the disadvantages outweigh the environmental benefits. From my perspective, although reducing the number of times to fly can decrease CO2 emissions, it can damage the benefits of the tourism industry in other countries, which causes economic loss.
To begin with, cutting down the frequency of times to fly can decrease carbon footprints. This is because CO2 is produced from industry and transportation such as planes, which is harmful to the environment and damages the habitats of animals. Therefore, if we decrease the number of times to fly, it could reduce CO2 emissions and conserve the environment. For instance, some airline companies are promoting some less CO2-producing flights for customers who want to support earth conservation.
Nevertheless, although a shortage in the amount of time to fly can benefit the environment, it could affect the benefits of the tourism industry to cause economic loss in countries which depend on tourism. Consequently, if some people have decided to reduce the times to fly, it will decrease the number of tourists and directly impact the tourism industry. Besides, decreasing the number of tourists not only affects the tourism industry, but also affects individuals’ employment.
In conclusion, while cutting down the frequency of times to fly can benefit the environment, like reducing CO2 emissions and carbon footprints, it could damage some countries dependent on tourism, bringing financial revenue.
These days, eating junk food has become trend. people like to eating street food a lot because it is very tasty and cheap. Scientist believes that fast food are destroying their mental health by taking excessive consumption of junk food. I completely agree with this, In this essay I will give my opinion with example.
First of all, Junk food contains fat and oil in high proportions, which is not good for our health, especially for those who are consumes it high amounts . regulary eating unhealthy food with sugar and high tropical oil is detrimental to health which can leads to serious health issues; For example: diabetes, thyroid, inflammation, gatric problem, obesity, laziness, Cardiovascular disease, overweight etc. it also increasing cholestrol in our body which may lead to our heart attack.
Another reason, why I agree with this because of hygine issues. what I mean by this is that street foods are generally available on the road side. Mosquito’s and flies sit on the food which is harmful for our health. Shop keepers who are selling the food are not even wearing gloves.
On the other hand, Schools and institutions prioritze physical activities for students. Good nutrition can enhance and sporting performance. The benefits of education in schools are far-reaching, increasing students’ physical health and improve better academic performance. In addition, sports facilities should be available in every neighbourhood, so residents feel encouraged to excersise regularly. For instances This idea has been applied in Gulf Countries Such as Saudia, Arabia, & UAE where outdoor activities are installed in public parks this act could be bring positive impact on youth life style so visitor now use them. This act could be bring positive impact on youth life style.
In conclusion, I believe that junk food is very tasty and cheap, and it can save time and money. Youth should remember, especially the younger generation, that overconsuming fast food affects our lives very badly. However, education if we give proper awarness to our nations about eat mix veggies & home made dishes that would be most benefitable for our healthy lifestyle.
Thank you very much for enhancing my essay.
it is great
…
Nowadays, most criminals continue to commit crimes even after being punished by law.
It is quite obvious the rate of crimes is increasing day by day in all societies in the world, but I personally do believe that there is a lot which can be done by both governments and individuals to reduce crimes in communities.
First of all, it is often observed that many lawbreakers start committing crimes due to poverty, hunger, lack of resources, education, job opportunities, and other reasons for high inflation, which means that as poor people they cannot afford basic necessities. A government should take steps in order to overcome or even eradicate different types of crimes. Initially, governments can introduce more police forces everywhere to monitor people’s activities and stop them from committing crimes. Secondly, the states can apply new technologies, for example: surveillance cameras in the streets, shopping centers, restaurants, and all public places to cease such things. Third, strict punishment on crooks can have preventive and deterrent effects on all age groups in society, so by using harsh penalties like imprisonment, physical, or financial punishments, the rate of crimes can be reduced.
On the other hand, individuals in society can be a great help in reducing the number of crimes committed. To my mind, the overwhelming majority of people tend to participate in volunteer programs, assisting the government to keep societies a better place for their own families. Furthermore, most people reporting problems to the police can play a crucial role in crime-prevention activities. In addition, when people themselves care about decreasing crimes in cities, it can be sort of a preventive action to harness the situation in a society well by the government as well.
To conclude, in order for society to be a safe place to live, all society members, including the government and people, must take necessary measures to keep it a crime-free place.
In some countries, people believe that buying a home is more important than renting one. In my opinion, there are many reasons contributing to this trend, and possessing a home is quite positive.
The main reason that people tend to own a house is because they can control the place. Compared to rented accommodations, individuals can make any changes, such as painting the walls, replacing the floor, and so on. This allows them to personalize the place as they want. Additionally, inflation is another contributing factor to avoid renting a dwelling. Every year, rising prices push people to pay more and more. Individuals pay money every month; however, they do not possess anything valuable at the end. Eventually, it is like throwing money away, which you could use to buy a house. For example, the survey conducted by financial advisors in Baku proved that people can own a house within 5 years if they apply for a mortgage instead of renting.
I support the idea that buying a dwelling is more beneficial than renting one. Possessing a house has an advantage, such as being an asset. Owners can sell their property whenever they need money. On the other hand, if they never need that money and keep their property, they will pass it on to the next generation. As a result, it will be easy for their children, and they will not be in a hurry to buy a house for themselves. For example, many parents in Azerbaijan pass their own apartment to their sons. This is a family trend for most of the population. Individuals tend to protect and rebuild their family places to keep the tradition alive.
In conclusion, buying a possession is more important than renting a property for its financial return in the long term. Moreover, being able to sell your property or pass it on to the next generation is a good situation.
In several countries, individuals prefer having their own house rather than renting one. This trend occurs due to increasing prices both on rent and basic needs. These circumstances lead to the situation where people simply cannot afford paying for their renting apartment. Another common reason to favor the ownership of a house is the desire to leave it for your children, so they will have a place to live when their parents are no longer with them to help. In my opinion, it is a highly concerning situation that has risen all over the world.
Nowadays, citizens of many countries find it difficult to pay for rent every month. A steady fall in quality of life can be seen in the rise of prices in many aspects of everyday life, including food, medications, and petrol prices. It’s getting harder to manage your budget since the average salary remains the same. For instance, in many big cities, people with average earnings spend half of it on rent and are left with little money to use on basic needs. Hence, people are saving money, considering buying a house in the future instead of renting.
Another reason that makes people favour ownership of an apartment is the desire to leave it as an investment for their children’s future. The younger generation tends to struggle to find an occupation that will be actually profitable. Moreover, many businesses would rather hire an experienced person and pay him more than train a former student. The market becomes unfriendly to those who need a consistent and stable job. That’s why, if a family owns a house or a flat, children won’t have to worry about paying rent in a moment of struggle. This inheritance will provide not only stability but more financial security in the future.
In conclusion, individuals nowadays consider possessing a house more important than paying for rent every month, mostly because of the high pricing of the market and the desire to provide a home for their children. And that is a negative development in many countries that shows how insecure we are in today’s capitalistic reality.