Part 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write at least 150 words.
The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Samples
Words: 0
The table indicates the number of individuals visiting the Ashdown Museum before and after the renovation. Meanwhile, The Pie charts illustrate the result of visitors satisfaction of their visit before and after the refurbishment of museum.
Overall, It is clear that after the refurbishment there is a hike of peoples visiting Ashdown museum as compare to before renovation and it indicates visitors are satisfied after refurbishment.
Firstly, Before the refurbishment the total number of visitors was 74000 but after the renovaation numbers surged to 92000 which shows a great success to Ashdown Museum. Peoples was dissatisfied has down significantly from 40% to 15% and visitors were very satisfied from 15% to rose dramtically up to 35% . As there is no change in visitors for no response it stays plateau before and After the refurbishment.
On the other hand, The number for satisfied attracts more portion from 30% to increases 40%. whereas, The number of very dissatisfied has slightly decreases from 10% to 5% which reflects after refurbishment the visitors are satisified and there is an growth Museum.
4.5 band
The table provides data about the individuals at Ashdown Museum who visited it during the year before and the year after its renovation. The pie charts illustrate the rate of visitor satisfaction during the same two periods.
Overall, the number of individuals who visited Ashdown Museum increased after it was refurbished, and the proportion of the satisfaction rate also grew.
Before renovation, 74,000 people visited the museum, and it rose to 92,000 after it was refurbished. The satisfaction percentage of visitors before and after refurbishment: the percentage of very satisfied visitors rose significantly from 15% to 35%, and the percentage of satisfied visitors slightly increased from 30% to 40%. While the proportion of dissatisfied visitors declined gradually from 40% to 15%, furthermore, the percentage of very dissatisfied visitors fell slightly from 10% to 5%. However, the number of individuals who did not give any response stayed the same in both periods. 7/9 band 151 words
This table illustrates the numbers of individuals who visited Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The graphs represent the conclusion of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Firstly, during the year before refurbishment, the volume of visitors to the Museum was 74,000. Alternatively, these figures increased vividly after refurbishment to 92,000. Nevertheless, the volume of individuals who did not respond to the surveys remained the same. Simultaneously, people who were not satisfied declined mainly from 40% to 15%.
The ratio of people who were satisfied with the Museum’s refurbishment decreased from 40% to 30%. Similarly, the same pattern has been observed with the visitors who were very dissatisfied with the change, declining from 10% to 5%. Lastly, the proportion of people who were very satisfied has increased dramatically from 15% to 35%.
In conclusion, people who were not satisfied initially had the highest volume. However, people who were satisfied took the highest place in the end. -8.0
5%
100000/100000
The table provides information about the number of visitors who visited the Ashdown museum during the year before and after its renovation, and pie charts give data about the level of satisfaction of its visitors in this period.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of visitors increased significantly after the redecoration of the museum, and the percentage of satisfied visitors also went up in the same year.
The number of visitors who visited Ashdown museum before the renovation was 74,000, and the figure expanded to 92,000 after its refurbishment.
Turning to the survey results, 15% of people showed satisfaction before the renovation, which went up to 40% after the renovation. Meanwhile, the percentage of very satisfied people was 15% before and 35% after refurbishment, and 40% were dissatisfied, which plummeted to 15% during the year after redecoration. Furthermore, the ratio of very dissatisfied people fell from 10% to 5%, whereas the percentage of people who did not respond at all (5%) remained the same in both years.
band -8.0
chatgpt 6.5
The table gives information about the visitors number in Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment. The pie charts illustrate the satisfaction survey of visitors in that time.
Overall, the total number of visitors went up. Also the number of people who were very satisfied increased and who were dissatisfied decreased.
Before the refurbishment only 74,000 people visited the Ashdown Museum. However this figure saw an increase after the refurbishment and went upto 92,000 during the same year.
The number of people who were very satisfied before the refurbishment were only 15%, however after that it went upto 35%. The people who were satisfied also increased from 30% to 40%. It is noticeable that those who were dissatisfied were 40% at the begining. The figure showed a sharp decline and ended up to 15%. Those who were very dissatisfied were also declined from 10% to 5%. The people who recorded no response were unchanged.
BAND 8:
The graphs presented provide a comprehensive overview of Ashdown Museum in terms of the number of visits and surveys by visitors over the period shown.
Overall, the year after refurbishment constituted the highest number of visits, whereas the year before refurbishment recorded the lowest figure throughout the whole period.
The table graph delineates that during the year before refurbishment, just 74,000 visitors went to the museum. However, the year after remodeling constituted the majority at 92,000 people.
On the other hand, regarding the pie chart of results of surveys on the year before refurbishment, dissatisfied constituted the highest at 40%, followed by satisfied at 30%, very satisfied at around 15%, and very dissatisfied and no response were 10% and 5% respectively. However, the year after refurbishment, 40% of people were satisfied, where subsequently, 35% of visitors were very satisfied. Nonetheless, dissatisfied people showed 15%, followed by very dissatisfied and no response with 5%.
The table charts below illustrate the amount of people who came to visit Ashdown Museum the year before and after.
Overall, it is clear that visitors who came the year before were mostly dissatisfied with the service, whereas the year after reconstruction they were satisfied.
To begin with, by the results of survey, the year before refurbishment 74000 people came to the museum. Half of the people who came were dissatisfied with the museum contributing at 50%(40% dissatisfied and 10% very dissatisfied), while the other half were fairly satisfied at about 45%(30% satisfied and 15% very satisfied). There is also people who didn’t particapate in the survey which made up 5%.
On the other hand, after the renovation 92000 pupil came and most of them(40% satisfied and 35% very satisfied) were satisfied with the renewed museum, although 20%(15% dissatisfied and 5% very dissatisfied) of them were still dissatisfied with it.Same as the last year the proportion of those who didn’t answer were 5%.
In summary, the refurbishment led to a significant rise in both visitor numbers and satisfaction level.
band 9
The data provided showcase a comparative analysis of the total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum and the results of the visitors’ satisfaction. The data were taken before and after finishing the museum’s refurbishment. Before refurbishment, the number of visitors was 74,000, while 92,000 visited after the refurbishment.
According to the survey, most of the people were dissatisfied during the year before refurbishment, marking 40% of the proportion, followed by those who were satisfied (30%), very satisfied (15%), then very dissatisfied (10%). The smallest figure of both the charts was visitors who were not willing to participate and gave no response, each marking 5% of the proportions.
On the other hand, people who were satisfied and very satisfied marked the largest proportions of the year after refurbishment chart. 40% were satisfied, and 35% were very satisfied. Only 15% of the participants felt dissatisfied, while in contrast, 5% of participants felt very dissatisfied, and 5% gave no response.