Band 6+: Should governments invest more in healthcare or prevention?

Your pronunciation is average. It is understandable but not always accurate. Focusing on the rhythm and stress patterns of English could prove beneficial.

The response addresses the question directly and provides a clear stance. The reasoning is logical and supported by an example. To further enhance the response, consider elaborating on the potential drawbacks of focusing solely on prevention or healthcare, and explore the nuances of implementing a balanced approach.

The answer is generally coherent, presenting a clear stance and supporting it with an example. However, there are some minor hesitations and awkward phrasing that slightly affect the flow. To improve, focus on smoother transitions between ideas and practice speaking more naturally.

The vocabulary is adequate for expressing the main points, but there's room for improvement in precision and variety. The phrase "suck up health education" is not idiomatic. Try to incorporate more specific and nuanced vocabulary related to healthcare and prevention. For example, instead of 'prevent measures,' use 'preventative strategies' or 'public health initiatives.'

The answer contains grammatical errors that impact clarity. For example, "government invest more in prevention raises than focusing society on treatment" is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "set bot line and resource" is unclear and likely contains errors. Focus on using correct verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and accurate phrasing. Review basic grammar rules and practice constructing more complex sentences accurately.