Band 5+: should schools teach students how to grow vegetables?

Your pronunciation is quite good. Working on consistency and tackling difficult sounds may enhance clarity.

The answer directly addresses the question and provides a clear opinion. However, the response is somewhat repetitive and the final sentence is incomplete, which affects the overall coherence and logical flow. To improve, try to expand on the reasons why it is not necessary for a school curriculum - for example, by mentioning that schools should focus on academic subjects - and ensure that every sentence is grammatically complete to convey a full thought.

The response lacks coherence and ends abruptly, leaving the thought unfinished ('that's why it doesn't'). There is significant repetition of ideas and a lack of logical progression. To improve, use cohesive devices like 'Furthermore,' 'On the other hand,' or 'Consequently' to link your ideas, and ensure you complete your sentences to provide a full argument.

The vocabulary used is very basic ('not so necessary', 'not so hard', 'other people'). While the meaning is mostly clear, it lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. Instead of 'not so necessary,' try 'not essential' or 'not a core academic subject.' Instead of 'other people,' try 'experienced gardeners' or 'mentors.' Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

There are several grammatical errors that impede the flow, such as 'shouldn't have how to grow' (instead of 'shouldn't learn how to') and 'during of their life.' The sentence structures are mostly simple and repetitive. To reach a higher band, practice using complex sentences (e.g., 'Although gardening is a useful skill, I believe it should be taught at home rather than in a formal school setting').