Band 7+: Why do people like expensive watches

Your pronunciation is quite good. Working on consistency and tackling difficult sounds may enhance clarity.

The answer stays on topic and directly addresses the question, providing a clear reason (status symbol) and elaborating with additional points about job indication and perceived masculinity. The response is natural and appropriately developed, though it could be slightly more concise and avoid repetition (e.g., 'indicator' used twice). To improve, consider adding a brief example or contrasting perspective to enrich the elaboration.

The answer is coherent and logically organized, with a clear main point and supporting details. There is some repetition of the phrase 'it can be an indicator' and a minor self-correction ('watts' to 'watch'), but overall the response flows naturally. To improve, reduce repetition and use a wider range of cohesive devices.

The vocabulary is adequate and conveys the intended meaning, but there are some inaccuracies and informal choices. For example, 'watts' instead of 'watch', 'high ping' instead of 'high-paying', and 'manly' is a bit informal. To achieve a higher score, use more precise and varied vocabulary, such as 'status symbol', 'affluence', 'socioeconomic background', or 'masculine appeal'.

The grammar is mostly accurate, with a good range of structures including conditional and comparative forms. There are a few minor errors, such as 'having an expensive watts' (subject-verb agreement) and 'could also make you look more manly' (missing subject 'it'). Overall, the grammar is controlled and does not impede understanding. To improve, ensure subject-verb agreement and complete sentences.