The line graph shows how accessible the eBook was in some cases to the assessment participation of 87 college students.
In general, the assessments tend to be positive, focusing mainly on levels 2, 3, 4 in all four cases: availability of eBooks in the school library, availability of eBook distributors. , the high cost of eBooks and good policies to develop eBooks. Looking in more detail, the number of people who think it is very difficult to access in most options accounts for the least proportion, however, the school library equipped with eBooks still seems to be very difficult to access for students. , when up to 13 students agreed with the above assessment, higher than level 2 (difficult) and level 5 (very easy). The reviews at level 2 (difficult) mostly have a low proportion, but the fact that the eBook has a high price makes many people seem to disagree. The high-priced eBook is the option with the most negative reviews, with 30 people choosing it.
In the other direction, level 3 (neutral) ratings are quite popular as they always account for the highest percentage of eBook usage in the library with 23 people, good policies with 37 people, and it ranks 1st. two with the remaining options, almost equal to 26. Rating at level 4 (easy) is uneven but also tops in the two options, the presence of eBook distributors with 37 people and the availability of eBooks in the school library with 29 people. In contrast, ratings of level 5 (very easy) are evenly distributed across all four options, ranging from 12 to 14 ratings.