Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays two graphs. The first graph marks total tiger population across reserves with numerical data points: 1802 for 1972, 1308 for 1979, 1121 for 1984, 1327 for 1989, 1366 for 1993, 1333 for 1995, 1498 for 1997, and 1576 for 2002. The second graph documents tiger count across Bandipur, Corbett, Kanha, Sunderbans, and Buxa reserves from 1972 to 2002 with specific data: Bandipur shows 92 in 1972, peaking at 260 in 1989, and declining to 250 by 2002; Corbett begins at 29 in 1972, grows to 225 by 1997, and then drops to 100 in 2002; Kanha starts at 43 in 1972, gradually increases to 210 by 2002; Sunderbans moves from 15 in 1972 to a plateau at 130 from 1993 onwards; Buxa initiates at 0 in 1972, reaching 100 by 2002.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.
The bar chart below provides the amount of all tiger species reserves in India, divided into five separate groups of reserve, during 30 years.
Initially the bar charts show the rapid increasing amount of tigers’ reserves from 1972-2002. Significant changes suppose to be suspected in Bandipur, Corbett, reserves increase their amount estimately. While Buxa, Kanha, and Sundarbans shows the way less recognisable differences.
As we can suspect the Bandipur illustrates an incredible rise in the number of tiger species, the reserve makes their overcome 6 times more from 1972 to 1984. As a result the whole number of animals developed from 268 to 1121. Others, Corbett, Kanha doubled the number of individuals throughout that period, from approximately 50 to 140 species. Moreover, the Buxa reserve initially provided a rising trend, but from 1993 till 2002 the amount remained constant.
Word Count: 139
