The given line graph illustrates, the information about the percentage of teenagers who were arrested in cities, suburbs and outskirts from 1995 to 1998.
Overall, at the first glance, it is clearly seen that in the initial year the crime figure was highest in villages. While, in the last year there was no crime in suburbs.
As per the pictorial, in 1995 the ratio of juvenile arrests was 2% in suburbs. However, after one year, the figure for crime was at its peak at 8%. Additionally, a continuous gradual decline can be seen in 1997, and the data was below 0 (-3%). To add to it, in suburban areas there were zero arrests at the end of the given period.
Probing ahead, in the initial year, the highest crime committed by youngsters was in outskirts (approximately 3%). In contrast, the figures for arrests of teens under 18 in rural and urban areas showed the same changes, where in 1996 the data rose 1% and 2% respectively. In addition, after two years a constant decline can be seen in the ratio of juvenile arrests in rural and city areas: -2% and -5%, consequently.