🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 8+: The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

Image for topic: The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays percentage data for household waste recycled in one city for the years 1992, 1997, and 2002. For plastic: 1992 roughly 2%, 1997 about 7%, 2002 around 11%. For paper: 1992 approximately 13%, 1997 roughly 18%, 2002 around 47%. For glass: 1992 about 15%, 1997 roughly 22%, 2002 27%. For cans: 1992 around 8%, 1997 close to 15%, 2002 about 23%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart illustrates the proportions of various types of domestic waste in one city from 1992 to 2002.

From an overall perspective, it is apparent that the percentages of glass, paper and plastic recycling showed an upward trend over the surveyed period, with glass and paper experiencing the most noticeable growth. In addition, the recycling rate of glass was consistently highest during the same period.

In 1992, the proportion of cans recycled was highest, at just under one-fifth. The figures for glass and paper were lower, at around 16% and 15%, respectively. However, the recycling of plastic accounted for the lowest percentage, at precisely 10%.

Between 1992 and 2002, the proportion of plastic recycled experienced a slight rise to about 12% before remaining stable in the last year of the period, remaining at its lowest rate of waste recycled. The data on paper witnessed a significant increase to nearly 28% in 1997, then rocketed to approximately 39% in 2002. Likewise, the figure for glass witnessed the same surge, soaring to over one-third in 1997 before reaching its peak of just under 50%. Additionally, the percentage of cans recycling fluctuated marginally, rising to roughly 30% in the last year after declining to 15% in 1997.

Word Count: 205

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct types of recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The bar chart gives information about the proportions of four different kinds of residential waste that was recycled in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, recycling became increasingly more common amongst households in this city, with paper and glass being the most widely recycled materials in the last five years. In 1992, approximately […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The bar graph illustrates proportion of different types og household waste,which recycled in single city between 1992 and 2002. From an overall perspective,it is apparent that the persentage of glass and paper showed an upward trend over the surveyed period.On the other hand proportion of plastic waste illustrates the lowest trend. In terms of glass […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The bar chart illustrates the distribution of recycled plastic, paper, glass, and cans in 1992, 1997, and 2002**** Overall, glasses were the most recycled type of waste amoung all years except in 1992 were cans were the most recycled one. In contrast, plastic waste was the least recyled one in all the 3 years. In […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The bar chart gives information about the proportion of recycled 4 types household waste-Plastic, Cans, paper and glass- in a city in 1992,1997 and 2002 Overall, the recycled waste rate increased over the years. Glass and paper became the most recycling waste while the least recycling materials were made out of plastic and cans. Glass […]

See All

Other Topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The chart below shows the percentage of children in a European country who took part in four kinds of activities in 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words. <

The illustration provides information about numbers of children in several European countryes in four tipes of activities. Overall, we have dates about the activities such as Watch TV and Ride bikes, which shows the most higher percentage. The most percentages of all the age categories of activities is Watching TV. Meanwhile the least popular tipe […]

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spend their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates how families in a particular country allocate their weekly income to different categories in 1968 to 2018 Overall, the highest proportion was spent on food in 1968 and the least was spent on fuel and power. While in 2018, the most amount of spending was on leisure and the least investing […]

The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the average class size of primary schools (ages 5-10) and lower secondary schools (ages 13-16) in six countries, as well as the world average, in 2006. Overall, South Korea had the largest average class sizes at both educational levels, whereas Iceland recorded the smallest figures. In most countries, lower secondary classes […]

The chart below shows library borrowing in UK public libraries during a 10-year period from 1995 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart compares the proportions of library borrowing in public libraries in the UK during 1995 and 2005. Overall, most presentages saw a upward trend while Children’s Books was one of the common materials and showed a dramatialy large figure in the starting than other books. The Top Audio-Visual Materials experienced gradual drop, which is […]

The graphs give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.

The graphs show the percentage of people who owned a computer between 2002 and 2010, and computer ownership by education level in 2002 and 2010. Overall, computer ownership increases steadily during the period. In addition, people with higher levels of education were more likely to own a computer, although ownership rose across all educational groups. […]

The bar graph shows the total manufacturing production in percentages Asia, Europe, and the rest of the world from the years 1840 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph illustrates the proportion of overall manufactured products across two countries and the rest of the world in a 70-year period. It is apparent that all of the examined countries demonstrated a nonstop fluctuation trend throughout the period. While in 1840, Asian product recorded the largest component, in 1920, it represented the smallest […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.