🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 7+: The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

Image for topic: The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image presents a line graph depicting three different communication methods used by teenagers in the United States from 1990 to 2020, represented by text messages, calls, and face-to-face. In 1990, text messages start at approximately 0%, calls at about 70%, and face-to-face at 90%. By 2000, text messages rise to around 15%, calls decline to roughly 75%, and face-to-face drops to about 80%. In 2010, text messages increase to approximately 40%, calls continue to decrease to around 50%, and face-to-face falls to about 60%. In 2020, text messages surge to 80%, calls further decrease to around 30%, and face-to-face plummets to about 40%. Each communication method's line intersects with the others at different points between 2000 and 2010, with text messages and calls intersecting at around 2005 near 40%, and text messages and face-to-face intersecting close to 2010 at nearly 50%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The presented graph illustrates information of three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the US during 1990 to 2020.

Overall, it is immediately noticeable that the trend of text messages is growing, whereas, Face to face is dropping gradually.

Text messages were the least way used by younger generations in the beginning, in 1990. However, as the technology had been developing and people started to send text messages to communicate, this way of communicating started to raise gradually and began to skyrocket dramatically since 2010, surpassing Face to face in around 2010 and Calls in around 2015.

In the other hand, in 1990, Face to face was the dominant way to communicate among teenagers in the US. Nonetheless, it has been gradually falling every year since 1990. Being surpassed by another ways of communicating, Text messages and Calls, Face to face became the least popular way that teenagers in the US to communicate since around 2010.

Word Count: 158

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

The line graph delineates the evolution of three distinct modes of communication employed by adolescents in the United States from 1990 to 2020. Overall, there is a marked increase in text messaging as a preferred communication method among teenagers, while both calls and face-to-face interactions exhibit a significant decline over the specified period. In 1990, […]

The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

The line chart illustrates information about three various methods of conversation utilized by young people in United States from 1990 to 2020. Overall, at the beginning of the period, the figure for face to face interaction was highest figure among other figures, whereas text messages recorded the lowest figure at the starting point. Nevertheless, over […]

The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

The line graph illustrates the percentage of American teenagers who used three methods of communication from 1990 to 2020, over a period of 30 years. Looking from an overall perspective, it can be seen that the figure for those who utilized face-to-face communication witnessed a downward trend, while conversation which are texting and calling went […]

The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

The line graph compares the proportion of teenagers in the United States who used three different types of communication – face-to-face interaction, text messaging, and phone calls – between 1990 and 2020. Overall, the rate of face-to-face communication among teenagers declined dramatically over the period, while both text messaging and phone communication increased substantially. Looking […]

The graph below gives information about three different ways of communication used by teenagers in the United States between 1990 and 2020

The line graph compares the percentage of teenagers who was used three types of communication skills in the US from 1990 and 2020. Overall, the rate of face to face communication used by teenagers experienced a fall whereas the figures for the remaining categories increased sharply, throughout the span covered. Looking at the graph in […]

See All

Other Topics:

The line graph below shows the average amount of fast food consumed per person per week in three countries between 1980 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates the variations in the consumption of fast food per person per week in USA, UK, and Japan from 1980 to 2020. Overall, it is evident that the average amount of fast food consumed per person in the UK and Japan went up throughout the period, whereas graph for USA showed a […]

The line graph shows the average number of hours Ukrainian teenagers spent on four selected free time activities per week from 2000 to 2015.

The line graph illustrates how much time teenagers in Ukraine spent on leisure activities over a 20-year period, with figures given in thousands of hours. Overall, while some activities declined throughout the period, the time spent on social media increased significantly. In contrast, the figure for reading remained unchanged. In 2000, teenagers spent 8 hours […]

The graph below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in five European countries between 2000 and 2012.

The given graph illustrates the percentage of parliament members who is a female during 12-years period since 2000 in Germany, Spain, Belgium, The UK and Italy. Overall, all country witnessed an upward trend in the percentage of women parliament membership. Moreover, Italy experienced the most significant rise over time and Germany saw the least significant […]

The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.

The graph below illustrates the number of smokers per 1000 people in Someland among both male and female over a distinct time period between 1960 and 2000. Overal, It is evident that in 1960 there was more smokers among meb and they recorded a highest point. Meanwhile, the number of smoking women was very low […]

The graph below gives data about the number of jobs in four sectors of the economy in the US between 1960 and 2020.

The graph illustrates the employment figures across four sectors of the economy in the US between 1960 and 2020. Overall, retail and healthcare showed a great rise in the given period, while manufacturing and agriculture experienced a slight decline. By 2020 retail and healthcare had emerged as the largest sector. In 1960, both retail and […]

the graph shows the number of people taking parts in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005

The line graph delineates the number of participants in four distinct sports – Basketball, Tennis, Badminton, and Rugby – within a specific region over a 20-year period from 1985 to 2005. Overall, participation in Tennis demonstrated a steady increase, while Rugby experienced a significant decline. In contrast, Basketball and Badminton exhibited fluctuating trends throughout the […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.