Bar Chart

Band 6+: The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image shows a bar graph with six different countries including South Korea, Japan, UK, Denmark, Mexico, Iceland, and a category labeled "World average." Each has two bars for "% Primary school (age 5-10)" and "% Lower secondary school (age 13-16)." The percentages approximately are: South Korea (Primary around 34%, Secondary around 32%), Japan (Primary around 28%, Secondary around 24%), UK (Primary around 25%, Secondary around 16%), Denmark (Primary around 24%, Secondary around 16%), Mexico (Primary around 27%, Secondary around 20%), Iceland (Primary around 18%, Secondary around 15%), and World Average (Primary around 16%, Secondary around 12%).

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The provided representation outlines data regarding the average and compares class size in six nations in 2006.

Overall, it is evident that the average in South Korea was the highest. In contrast , the level in Iceland was the lowest in six countries during the given time period.

Looking at the bar chart in more detail, we can see that tha average Primary education in South Korea was higher than Japan at approximately 34 and 27 respectively. However, the UK , Denmark and Mexico were almost similar at 23, 22 and 22 in 2006 respectively. Meanwhile, Iceland recorded lowest at 15, whereas the corresponding World average figure was above 25 in Primary school in 2006.

On closer inspection to the ramaining data, it is evident that the average in lower secondary school Japan was lower than South Korea at about 31 and 36 in 2006 respectively. Simultaneously, the lower secondary school in Mexico was most at 31 , while the figure for World average was at 24 . Moreover, the UK was 23 and Denmark and Iceland was almost similar were at 19 and 17 in 2006 respectively.

Word Count: 188

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

average: 6

respectively: 4

south: 3

korea: 3

iceland: 3

school: 3

lower: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report addresses the task by presenting an overview and some comparisons, but it contains several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the data. For example, the figures for South Korea and Japan are misstated, and the world average is incorrectly described as above 25 for primary school. Additionally, some statements are unclear or contradictory (e.g., 'the lower secondary school in Mexico was most at 31' while South Korea is also given a high figure). The report would benefit from more accurate data reporting and clearer organization. Ensure that all key features are covered and that comparisons are made logically and consistently.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction and an overview, and it attempts to organize data by educational level. However, the flow is sometimes disrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear references (e.g., 'the average in lower secondary school Japan was lower than South Korea at about 31 and 36' is confusing). The use of cohesive devices is basic, and some sentences are long and convoluted, making the message harder to follow. To improve, use clearer topic sentences for each paragraph and ensure that comparisons are logically sequenced. Also, avoid overusing 'respectively' and ensure that each sentence has a clear subject and object.

Lexical Resource

The report uses some appropriate vocabulary for describing data (e.g., 'outlines data', 'evident', 'recorded lowest', 'corresponding'). However, there is limited range and flexibility. Some word choices are imprecise (e.g., 'the average in South Korea was the highest' could be more specific, and 'the level in Iceland was the lowest' is vague). There are also minor errors in word form and collocation (e.g., 'the average Primary education' should be 'the average class size in primary education'). To improve, expand your range of synonyms for 'average' and 'class size', and use more precise terms like 'approximately', 'slightly higher', 'considerably lower', etc. Also, ensure that you use correct collocations (e.g., 'recorded the lowest figure').

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings that affect clarity. For example, 'tha average' is a typo, 'the average in lower secondary school Japan' is missing a preposition, and 'Denmark and Iceland was almost similar were at 19 and 17' is grammatically incorrect. Punctuation is also inconsistent (e.g., missing spaces after commas). To improve, proofread carefully for subject-verb agreement, use correct prepositions, and ensure that each sentence is grammatically complete. Vary your sentence structures more, but always prioritize accuracy. Using a wider range of complex structures (e.g., relative clauses, comparatives) would also enhance your score.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph illustrates the average class size of primary and lower secondary school in South Korea, Japan, the UK, Denmark, Mexico, and Iceland and compares it with the global average class size in 2006. Overall, South Korea accounted for the highest number of students in a class, whereas Iceland had the lowest class size […]

Band 7+

The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

The graph compares the avarage class size in primary and lower secondary schools, divided into six nations also compares it with the world average in 2006. Overall, South Korea and Japan had the largest classroom, while iceland had by far the smallest. The world avarage fell roughly in the middle. In primary education South Korea […]

Band 6+

The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the average class size of primary schools (ages 5-10) and lower secondary schools (ages 13-16) in six countries, as well as the world average, in 2006. Overall, South Korea had the largest average class sizes at both educational levels, whereas Iceland recorded the smallest figures. In most countries, lower secondary classes […]

Band 8+

See All

The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of divorce records in Finland and Sweden in for 5 years from 2011 to 2015. Overall, divorce rates in Finland rose gradually, while it fell down in Sweden. In 2011, approximately 37% of couples divorced in Finland, while 44% in Sweden. In 2012, Finland’s figure decreased to around 33%, […]

Band 6+

The bar chart compares the percentage of people who used different types of transport to travel to work in 2010 and 2020.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who used different types of transport to travel to work in a European city in 2010 and 2020. Overall, the use of cars decreased over the period, whereas buses and bicycles became more popular. In contrast, the percentage of people who walked remained unchanged. In 2010, 50% […]

Band 7+

Comparing Fruit Sales at a Farmers' Market and a Supermarket. The fruits are: pears, pinapples, oranges and strawberries.

The provided bar graph illustrates the difference of saled fruit boxes in supermarket and farmers’ market on five various products. Overall, there are high difference at strawberries, oranges, and pears. In contrast, cherries and pineapples sales are same in both places. There is high demand to the strawberry in farmers’ market, sold seven boxes, however […]

Band 5+

The fast food consumption among men and women in 2015.

The bar chart illustrates junk fjjd intake among female and male in 2015. Overall, it is evidence that the proportion of young men cinsamption fast food showed the highest fogure than womenm.However, the rate of old age group men showed the lower figure.In addition,the rate of old age women showed the lower result. According to […]

Band 4+

Passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000

The bar chart demonstrate the different use of transport type in the period from 1990 to 2000 in the UK. Overall, The Total amount of travelling has increased and that make the conclusion that most of the navigation types use rise. As Shown, The total has reached its peak of approximitly from 110 to 120 […]

Band 4+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium