🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 5+: The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Image for topic: The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a bar chart illustrating student accommodation preferences in percentage from the 1960s to the 2000s. In the 1960s "At home with own family" stands at 68%, "Students hall of residence" at 22%, "Paying guest with a host family" is 8%, "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" is approximately 2%. The 1970s show "At home with own family" decreasing slightly to around 63%, "Students hall of residence" drops to 17%, "Paying guest with a host family" marginally increases to 9%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" rises to around 11%. During the 1980s, a significant shift occurs with "At home with own family" plummeting to 48%, "Students hall of residence" increases to 26%, while "Paying guest with a host family" decreases slightly to 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" surges to nearly 19%. In the 1990s, "At home with own family" continues to decrease to 43%, "Students hall of residence" sees a slight drop to 24%, "Paying guest with a host family" remains stable at 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" increases to approximately 26%. In the 2000s, "At home with own family" slightly rises around 45%, "Students hall of residence" increases to 27%, "Paying guest with a host family" again remains stable at 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" sees a small increase to just above 26%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart gives information about how many students lived in four different kinds of accommodation over a 50-year period lasting from the 1960s to 2000s

Overall, it is clear that the proportion of students sharing a home with their peers and living with a host family saw continuous upward and downward trends respectively while the fluctuations could be seen in the remaining categories. This ultimately widened the gap between the percentages of students choosing shared houses and the rest.

To begin with, sharing a home with others and living in a host family’s house accounted for 35% of students each, whereas the other types of housing were home to 15% each in the 1960s. In the 1980s, the first mentioned category increased significantly to 60% but playing guests with a host family became less popular with a sharp decrease of 15%. However, in terms of popularity, it still played a second place as being accommodated by their schools and own families were the choices of only 15% and 5% of total students respectively.

From the 1980s and 2000s, the proportion of students who lived with their peers continued the rise and reached a peak of 70%. At the same time, the figure for being housed by a host family saw another decrease to 5% and became the least popular choice of student housing. Simultaneously, the number of students choosing dormitories decreased slightly by approximately 3% after having risen by 5%. Finally, the number of students housed by their own families stagnated at 5% until a growth to relatively 12%, the same as that of the hall of residence, in the 2000s.

Word Count: 272

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph illustrates changes in student accommodation preferences from the 1960s to the 2000s, showing the percentage of students in four types of living arrangements. The most striking trend is the sharp rise in students choosing to live as paying guests with host families. This figure almost doubled, from 40% in the 1960s to 75% […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar bar chart illustrates the number of changes in some different types of accommodation chosen by students over a period of five decades. As can be seen, the majority of learners are more likely to live in a shared house or flat with other friends, as opposed to a downward tendency of three […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph a percentage changes in different types of accomodation between 1960 and 2000. Overall, the percentage of living in room or flat with other students grew every decade while the percenrage of other places where students lived decreased by 2000. In the middle of 19th century, living with other students was at the same […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares the proportion of students’ housing preferences between 1960s and 2000s. Overall, most categories experienced a steady decrease in popularity, with the only notable exception being shared houses with other students, which rose dramaticcaly. While both staying at home and living in the hall of residence showed minor fluctuations, the proportion of […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph illustrates the trends in students’ accommodation preferences over a span of five decades. Overall, the proportion of students opting to live in shared houses or flats with peers saw a significant rise, while the percentage of those staying as paying guests with host families declined considerably. Meanwhile, the figures for students living in […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart below shows the production of the world’s oil in OPEC and non-OPEC countries. Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The bar chart presents data regarding global oil production, specifically highlighting contributions from OPEC and non-OPEC countries between 1980 and 2020. The chart contrasts three distinct categories: non-OPEC nations, other OPEC countries, and OPEC nations from the Middle East. A prominent observation from the data is the substantial growth of oil production in non-OPEC countries, […]

The graph below contrasts the global automobile sales from 2007 to 2008 in different quarters. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at the chart provided reveals the contrast of global car sale in a year period between 2007 and 2008 in different quarters. Overall, there are four different nations. Namely: United States, Western Europe, Japan, and China. The trend of the China clearly shows they dominated approximately in every quarters, except the third one. […]

The graph below shows the number of applicants from four different countries in a UK university between 1999 and 2003. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar graph compares the number of students from four different nations that applied in a UK university from 1999 to 2003. Overall, the number of international applicants increased gradually over the time while European Nations being an exemption which consistently declined. European students who had topped the chart in 1999 with 30,000 applicants […]

Michelin stars is a rating system used to grade restaurants on their quality by red Michelin guide every year. The graph represents the countries by number of 3 Michelin star restaurants in November 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph depicts the number of countries by rating Michelin 3-star restaurants in November 2017. Overall, there are 11 countries which include Monaco in France and then Hong Kong and Macau clubbed in China.The data is in the form of highest to lowest. Highest was occupied by Japan whereas Belgium and South Korea gets 2 […]

The chart below give the information about the percentage of the adults population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980,1990,2000

The bar chart compares the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in Japan, Finland, Australia and USA from 1980 to 2000. Overall, the percentages in all countries increased steadily through the period, but the growth in the USA was more considerable. The highest percentage of overweight adults in 1980 was recorded in the […]

The chart below give the information about the percentage of the adults population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980,1990,2000

The chart illustrates the percentages of overweight adult people in Japan, Finland, Australia, and the US from 1 980 to 2000. Overall,the percentage of overweight adults increased in four different countries over the period, but the growth in the US was more considerable increased. In 1980 , the USA had the highest percentage (around 15%) […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.