🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 6+: The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Image for topic: The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a bar chart illustrating student accommodation preferences in percentage from the 1960s to the 2000s. In the 1960s "At home with own family" stands at 68%, "Students hall of residence" at 22%, "Paying guest with a host family" is 8%, "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" is approximately 2%. The 1970s show "At home with own family" decreasing slightly to around 63%, "Students hall of residence" drops to 17%, "Paying guest with a host family" marginally increases to 9%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" rises to around 11%. During the 1980s, a significant shift occurs with "At home with own family" plummeting to 48%, "Students hall of residence" increases to 26%, while "Paying guest with a host family" decreases slightly to 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" surges to nearly 19%. In the 1990s, "At home with own family" continues to decrease to 43%, "Students hall of residence" sees a slight drop to 24%, "Paying guest with a host family" remains stable at 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" increases to approximately 26%. In the 2000s, "At home with own family" slightly rises around 45%, "Students hall of residence" increases to 27%, "Paying guest with a host family" again remains stable at 7%, and "Room in a shared house or flat with other students" sees a small increase to just above 26%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar graph illustrates the percentage change in types of student accommodation from the 1960s to the 2000s. The four categories displayed are: rooms in a shared house or flat with other students, students hall of residence, paying guest with a host family, and at home with their own family.

Overall, sharing houses with other peers and paying guests with the host family were the most popular choice. Over the period, the first one increased and reached its top by the 2000s, while the opposite was on the other one. Meanwhile, living in students’ apartments and staying with family experienced a slight decrease in the 2000s.

In the 1960s, both staying with other students and living with host families accounted for the highest percentage, at 35%. However, the two categories experienced opposite trends. On the one hand, living with other students rose rapidly and reached its peak of 70%, on the other hand, staying with a host family dramatically declined to only 5% in the 2000s.

During the same period, living in the hall of residence fluctuated slightly before falling to 13% in the 2000s. Also, the ratio of students staying at their own houses mildly decreased from 15% to 12% in the 2000s.

Word Count: 204

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph illustrates changes in student accommodation preferences from the 1960s to the 2000s, showing the percentage of students in four types of living arrangements. The most striking trend is the sharp rise in students choosing to live as paying guests with host families. This figure almost doubled, from 40% in the 1960s to 75% […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar bar chart illustrates the number of changes in some different types of accommodation chosen by students over a period of five decades. As can be seen, the majority of learners are more likely to live in a shared house or flat with other friends, as opposed to a downward tendency of three […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph a percentage changes in different types of accomodation between 1960 and 2000. Overall, the percentage of living in room or flat with other students grew every decade while the percenrage of other places where students lived decreased by 2000. In the middle of 19th century, living with other students was at the same […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares the proportion of students’ housing preferences between 1960s and 2000s. Overall, most categories experienced a steady decrease in popularity, with the only notable exception being shared houses with other students, which rose dramaticcaly. While both staying at home and living in the hall of residence showed minor fluctuations, the proportion of […]

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph illustrates the trends in students’ accommodation preferences over a span of five decades. Overall, the proportion of students opting to live in shared houses or flats with peers saw a significant rise, while the percentage of those staying as paying guests with host families declined considerably. Meanwhile, the figures for students living in […]

See All

Other Topics:

The charts below show the percentage of males and females who got married in different ages in the UK in 1996 and 2008.

The bar graphs illustrate the ages at which males and females got married across a particular country in 1998 and 2008. Overall, marriage tendencies remained largely unchanged, with both females and males entering marriage mostly at ages 25-29 or 30-34. While the popularity of getting engaged at earlier ages, especially at 16-19, was the lowest […]

The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007.

The bar charts compare the level of human exposure to four distinct categories of noise during the day and night in a specific location in 2007. Overall, urban area residents were affected profoundly compared to people who lived in the countryside, especially during the day. Of particular note is that the noise which was generated […]

The bar graph shows the average hours of daily sunshine throughout the year in two cities of Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph compares the standard number of sunlight hours per day in Sydney versus Perth, Australia. Overall, it is clear that Perth has the highest average sunshine for almost all of the months, whereas Sydney has low sunshine duration per day. In terms of Perth, for the first three months, January to March, the […]

The bar chart shows percentages of three groups of australian children taking part in four kinds of activities in 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides a comparison of three age groups who participated in four leisure activities in 2012, measured in percentage. Overall, considerable differences can be observed among the categories presented. While watching TV accounted for the highest figures across all age groups, the opposite was true for art, which generally recorded comparativley lower values. […]

The bar chart shows percentages of three groups of australian children taking part in four kinds of activities in 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides a comparison of three age groups who participated in four leisure activities in 2012, measured in percentage. Overall, considerable differences can be observed among the categories presented. While watching TV accounted for the highest figures across all age groups, the opposite was true for art, which generally recorded comparatively lower values. […]

The bar chart below shows the number of people employed in five different sectors (sales, accounting, computing, nursing, and farming) in a region of Australia in 2001 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the number of public employed in different five types of work such as ( sales, accounting, computing, nursing and farming ) on one region of Australia between 2001 and 2008. Overall, it is clear that sales had the highest component over the period, while farming was the least and declined. Moreover, […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.