Line Graph

Band 4+: The graph below shows the percentage of households in four countries - India, Brazil, Germany, and South Korea - that had access to the internet between 2005 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graph below shows the percentage of households in four countries - India, Brazil, Germany, and South Korea - that had access to the internet between 2005 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a line graph titled "Percentage of households with internet access in four countries, 2005–2020 (%)". For Germany, the percentages are: 2005: 68%, 2007: 75%, 2009: 80%, 2011: 83%, 2013: 86%, 2015: 88%, 2017: 90%, 2020: 91%. For South Korea: 2005: 72%, 2007: 79%, 2009: 85%, 2011: 88%, 2013: 91%, 2015: 93%, 2017: 95%, 2020: 96%. For Brazil: 2005: 17%, 2007: 21%, 2009: 27%, 2011: 35%, 2013: 45%, 2015: 55%, 2017: 61%, 2020: 68%. For India: 2005: 2%, 2007: 3%, 2009: 5%, 2011: 10%, 2013: 15%, 2015: 23%, 2017: 32%, 2020: 42%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given graph illustrates the percentage of households in four different countries,That had access to the internet from year 2005 to 2020.Source of the information is international Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2021.

Overall, it is evident that every household across the countries drastically improved the access to the internet.South Korea and Germany are the top two countries from 2005 to 2020 to have highest percentage of households with internet.Additionally, Brazil and India maintained the same position third and fourth respectively.

Regarding the most significant figures of the data, South Korea and Germany had a great start in 2005 with 72 and 68 percent of households with internet access Where as Brazil and India were having significantly less households with internet access the percentage is 17 for Brazil and 2 for India in 2005.all the years from 2005 till 2020 all the four countries maintained the same position.

Turning to the remaining details, in 2007 India with 4 percent, Brazil with 21 percent,Germany with 75 percent and South korea with 79 percent.In 2009 India with 7 percent, Brazil with 27 percent,Germany with 79 percent and South korea with 83 percent.In 2011 India with 10 percent, Brazil with 35 percent,Germany with 82 percent and South korea with 87 percent.coming to remaining years 2013,2015,2017 and 2020 the rate of increasing has stayed almost same.

Word Count: 220

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

4.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

percent: 7

brazil: 6

india: 6

korea: 5

households: 4

access: 4

south: 4

percentage: 3

internet: 3

countries: 3

percentgermany: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report addresses the main requirements of the task by identifying the general upward trend and comparing the four countries. However, there are several areas for improvement. The overview is clear, but the data presentation in the body paragraphs is somewhat repetitive and relies heavily on listing individual data points rather than synthesizing the information. To improve, try to group data more effectively (e.g., comparing the rapid growth of Brazil and India against the more stable, high levels of South Korea and Germany) rather than listing every year. Additionally, be careful with sentence structure and punctuation; there are several instances of run-on sentences and capitalization errors that affect the flow. Aim to use more varied comparative structures to describe the trends more naturally.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report struggles with logical flow and organization. While there is an attempt to use cohesive devices (e.g., 'Overall', 'Regarding', 'Turning to'), they are often used incorrectly or followed by fragmented sentences. The paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs is weak. To improve, ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that sentences are connected logically using appropriate transition words. Avoid simply listing data points; instead, group information to show trends and relationships.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive. There is a heavy reliance on simple structures and a lack of variety in describing changes (e.g., 'drastically improved', 'great start'). Some phrasing is awkward or imprecise (e.g., 'the rate of increasing has stayed almost same'). To improve, work on using a wider range of academic synonyms for describing trends, such as 'climbed steadily', 'surged', 'experienced a significant rise', or 'remained relatively consistent'. Also, ensure that word choices are used in the correct context.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Grammatical errors are frequent and significantly impede the reader's ability to follow the report. There are numerous issues with sentence fragments (sentences that lack a main verb, such as the lists of years and percentages), improper capitalization (e.g., 'South korea', 'all the years'), and punctuation errors. There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and sentence construction. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence structures (Subject + Verb + Object) and ensure that every sentence is a complete thought. Practice using complex sentences with subordinating conjunctions (e.g., 'while', 'although', 'whereas') to combine ideas more effectively.

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who visited four attractions in a city between 1990 and 2020.

The line graph compares how the proportion of the tourists visiting four attractions in a city from 1990 and 2020. Overall, the percentage of tourists visiting the Zoo and Botanical Garden followed a consistently upward trajectory throughout the period, whereas as Museum and Art Gallary showed the opposite pattern, reaching their peaks before experiencing decline. […]

Band 8+

The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.

The provided line graph depicts the changes in the amount of three different types of fast food consumed weekly by individuals in the United Kingdom over a 30-year period, spanning from 1990 to 2020. Overall, it is clear that while the consumption of fish and chips experienced a significant decline over the three decades, the […]

Band 9

the line graph below shows the number of single-family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years.

The line graph illustrates the total number of single-family residential properties built across four distinct regions of the United States – the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West – between 2006 and 2012. Overall, all four regions experienced a significant decline in the number of newly constructed homes over the six-year period, with the sharpest drops […]

Band 9

The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The line graph reports a compare betwenn the number of participation to two new music sites on the web for a university lecturer. Overall, what stands out from the ine graph the number of visits of Pop Parade incerased throughout the period, which declined at the beginning the period. An additional interesting point that can […]

Band 4+

See All

Band 4+: The graph below shows the percentage of households in four countries - India, Brazil, Germany, and South Korea - that had access to the internet between 2005 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who visited four attractions in a city between 1990 and 2020.

The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.

The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

the line graph below shows the number of single-family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years.

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The line graph below shows the percentage of spending in Turkey, from 1960 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.

The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium