Multiple Graphs

Band 5+: The graphs below show public funding for the arts and attendance at cultural venues in Canada between 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graphs below show public funding for the arts and attendance at cultural venues in Canada between 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image features two line graphs spanning years 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. The top graph, titled "Participation in Cultural Activities in Brazil, 2005-2020", has the y-axis labelled "Percentage of Adult Population (%)" (ranging from below 20 to 60) and x-axis "Year": Cinema Attendance (45% in 2005, 52% in 2010, 58% in 2015, 55% in 2020), Live Music Concerts (30% in 2005, 35% in 2010, 42% in 2015, 38% in 2020), Museum/Gallery Visits (25% in 2005, 24% in 2010, 28% in 2015, 26% in 2020), and Theatre/Dance Performances (18% in 2005, 20% in 2010, 22% in 2015, 19% in 2020). The bottom graph, titled "Public Funding for the Arts in Brazil, 2005-2020", has the y-axis labelled "Funding (Millions of BRL)" (ranging from 140 to 300) and x-axis "Year": Music (220 in 2005, 250 in 2010, 300 in 2015, 270 in 2020), Performing Arts (200 in 2005, 240 in 2010, 280 in 2015, 250 in 2020), Heritage & Museums (180 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 230 in 2015, 200 in 2020), and Visual Arts (150 in 2005, 170 in 2010, 160 in 2015, 140 in 2020).

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graphs compare public investment for the arts and the proportion of population which attended three cultural venues in Canada from 2000 to 2020.

Overall, federal government funded the highest amount of money for arts and culture, followed by provincial, and the least amount was provided by the municipal government. In addition, museums welcomed the highest share of population, while art galleries recieved the least over the time period.

Notably, arts and culture were funded with 3.5 billions of CAD in 2000, which steadily rose to 4.3 billions of CAD in 2010 and eventually 5 billions of CAD in 2020. Similarly, provincial government invested 3 billions of CAD, which grew to 3.2 billions of CAD in 2010, and culminated to 4 billions of CAD in 2020. Municipal government also increased their funding, however there was a slight decline from 2005 to 2025.

Initially, slightly less than 42.5% attended museums in 200, which peaked at almost 45% in 2010, but fell around 37.5% at the end of the period. Performing arts began with 35% attendance in 2000, and after a marginal increase until 2005, it dropped to 30% by 2020. However, art galleries started with a little bit more than 27.5% in 2000, and after a peak in 2010 at around 30% , decreased to less than where it started in 2020.

Word Count: 222

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

5.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

billions: 6

which: 4

government: 4

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report attempts to address the task but contains significant inaccuracies and omissions. It misidentifies the country (Canada instead of Brazil) and the time period (2000-2020 instead of 2005-2020), and the data presented do not match the visual description. The overview is vague and not fully supported by the data. The report also includes irrelevant information about government funding levels that are not present in the visual description. To improve, focus on accurately summarizing the main trends and comparisons from the provided data, ensure the country and time frame are correct, and avoid introducing unsupported details.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for funding and attendance. However, the overview is not entirely accurate as it mentions Canada and different funding levels, which do not match the visual description. The progression of ideas is generally logical, but some sentences are awkwardly phrased and disrupt the flow. For example, 'Municipal government also increased their funding, however there was a slight decline from 2005 to 2025' is confusing and contains a date error. To improve, ensure the overview accurately reflects the main trends and use clearer topic sentences to guide the reader. Also, use cohesive devices more effectively to link ideas within and between paragraphs.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a range of vocabulary related to trends (e.g., 'steadily rose', 'culminated', 'peaked', 'decreased') and demonstrates some flexibility. However, there are several inaccuracies and awkward choices, such as 'public investment for the arts' (should be 'in the arts'), 'funded the highest amount of money' (redundant), and 'welcomed the highest share' (unusual collocation). Also, the report incorrectly refers to 'Canada' and 'CAD' instead of 'Brazil' and 'BRL', which is a significant lexical error. To improve, use more precise and natural collocations (e.g., 'received the highest percentage', 'allocated the most funding') and ensure terminology matches the given data.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report attempts to use a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences with subordinate clauses. However, there are several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that affect clarity. For example, 'the proportion of population which attended' should be 'the proportion of the population that attended'; 'recieved' is misspelled; 'in 200' should be 'in 2000'; and 'a little bit more than' is informal and wordy. Additionally, there are comma splices and missing commas (e.g., 'after a peak in 2010 at around 30% , decreased' has an extra space before the comma). To improve, proofread carefully for subject-verb agreement, article usage, and punctuation. Use a wider range of structures, such as passive voice and participle clauses, to enhance grammatical flexibility.

Task 1: The charts show how satisfied students were with several types of facilities at a university in the UK in the year 2007. Provide an overview of the information by identifying and describing the key details, and include comparisons where appropriate.

The pie charts compare how satisfied undergraduates and postgraduates were with three facilities at a UK university in 2007. Overall, most students were satisfied with all three facilities. Postgraduates were happiest with the cafeteria, while undergraduates were happiest with the school facilities. Looking at school rooms, both groups gave very similar answers. Around 62% of […]

Band 8+

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The pies charts illustrates the change in learning english over the period from 2010 to 2015, at 5-year intervals, measured in percent. Overall, upward and downward trends can be observed throughout the period. While everything class consistently remained the dominant category. Online class in country B experience the most dramatic growth, and eventually overtook abroad. […]

Band 5+

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The pie charts illustrate the changes in how people in three different countries learned English in 2010 and 2015. Overall, attending evening classes remained the dominant category across all three countries throughout the period. While online learning experienced an upward trend, studying abroad witnessed a slight decline or remained unchanged. In 2010, evening classes emerged […]

Band 8+

Task 1: The charts below show the percentage of food and goods bought from supermarkets in European countries in 1998 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the proportion of food and products purchased from supermarkets in European nations from 1998 to 2008. Overall, the most noticeable feature is that all nations followed an upward trajectory during the examined years, with country A occupying the largest proportion in both charts whereas country C consistently stood at the lowest […]

Band 8+

The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town (Ashby) and in the UK as a whole in 2008.

The pie graphs illustrate the proportions of individuals aged 23 to 65 engaged in different professions in Ashby, compared with those in the UK in 2008. Overall, personal service was the largest occupation in Ashby, while office work accounted for the highest proportion in the UK. The figures for the two areas were quite similar […]

Band 9

See All

Band 5+: The graphs below show public funding for the arts and attendance at cultural venues in Canada between 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

The following two pie charts display the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 word

Task 1: The charts show how satisfied students were with several types of facilities at a university in the UK in the year 2007. Provide an overview of the information by identifying and describing the key details, and include comparisons where appropriate.

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The chart shows the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

Task 1: The charts below show the percentage of food and goods bought from supermarkets in European countries in 1998 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town (Ashby) and in the UK as a whole in 2008.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium