Pie Chart

Band 4+: The pie charts below show the sources of electricity generation in Country X in 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The pie charts below show the sources of electricity generation in Country X in 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image contains two pie charts detailing the sources of electricity generation in Country X for the years 2000 and 2020. In 2000, the sources were: Coal 45%, Natural Gas 25%, Nuclear 20%, and Renewables 10%. In 2020, the sources were: Coal 20%, Natural Gas 30%, Nuclear 15%, and Renewables 35%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The illustration represents the types of electric power creation in Country X between 2000 and 2020 years.

Overall, the highest percentage of “2000” chart was “Coal” aspect with an amount of 45%, while the maximum value of “2020” graph was “Natural Gas” case (30%)

Moreover, the lowest percentage of the left pie chart was 10% at “Renewables” direction, when the minimum value of the right illustration was 15% (“Nuclear” response).

According to the “2000” pie chart , it is clearly seen that “Nuclear” and “Natural Gas” marks were slightly similar, 20% and 25%, respectively. Additionally, the green case of the left representation was quietly the same with the blue aspect of the right chart, 25% and 20%, relatively.

Also, in 2020, the green aspect (30%) was absolutely 2 times more than the yellow case (15%). Moreover, “Renewables” mark was exactly 2 times less than the “Nuclear” case, 10% and 20%, considerably.

Word Count: 151

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

chart: 4

aspect: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report attempts to address the task by mentioning the different energy sources and their percentages. However, the response is hindered by significant issues with clarity and data accuracy. There is frequent confusion in the descriptions (e.g., referring to 'green cases' or 'blue aspects' without a clear legend, and misstating the relationship between Renewables and Nuclear in the final sentence). To improve, focus on using standard academic vocabulary to describe trends and proportions rather than using colors or vague terms like 'aspect' or 'case'. Ensure that comparisons between the two years are logical and that the data cited directly supports the trends being described.

Coherence & Cohesion

The organization of the report is somewhat logical, but the cohesion is significantly hindered by awkward phrasing and repetitive structures. The use of transition words like 'Moreover' and 'Additionally' is present, but they do not always connect ideas smoothly because the underlying sentences are difficult to parse. To improve, focus on using cohesive devices to link data points naturally (e.g., 'In contrast,' 'While,' 'Conversely') rather than just listing observations. Avoid using quotation marks around data categories, as this disrupts the flow of reading.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary usage is highly unconventional and often inaccurate for an academic report. Terms such as 'Coal aspect,' 'Renewables direction,' 'Nuclear response,' and 'green case' are not appropriate ways to describe data categories. This makes the report feel unnatural and sometimes confusing. Instead of assigning arbitrary labels like 'green case' or 'blue aspect,' you should use the actual names of the categories provided in the task (e.g., 'the proportion of renewables' or 'the share of natural gas'). Aim for more precise academic verbs such as 'accounted for,' 'comprised,' or 'constituted'.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

There are frequent grammatical errors and awkward sentence constructions that impede clarity. The phrasing 'between 2000 and 2020 years' is incorrect; it should be 'between 2000 and 2020.' Additionally, the comparison structures are often confused (e.g., 'exactly 2 times less than' is mathematically and grammatically awkward). You should practice using comparative and superlative structures more accurately (e.g., 'twice as much as' or 'half the amount of'). Work on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of prepositions to ensure your sentences follow standard English patterns.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The pie charts below show the sources of electricity generation in Country X in 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts illustrate the changes in the proportion of electricity generation from four different sources in Country X between 2000 and 2020. From an overall perspective, coal accounted for the largest proportion in the first chart, while renewables which registered the lowest figure. However, in the second pie chart, renewables and natural gas […]

Band 8+

The pie charts below show the sources of electricity generation in Country X in 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts illustrate the changes in the proportion of electricity generation from four different sources in Country X between 2000 and 2020. From an overall perspective, coal accounted for the largest proportion in the first chart compared to renewables which registered the lowest figure. However, in the second pie chart, renewables and natural […]

Band 8+

The pie charts below show the sources of electricity generation in Country X in 2000 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the sources of electricity generation in Country X between 2000 and 2020. Overall, the proportion of coal was the highest level at the beginning of the period, however, it decreased significantly at the end of the period. Renewables achieved the largest level at the end of the period. In terms if […]

Band 6+

See All

The pie charts show how adults in one country spent a typical weekday in 2000 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts give information about how adults spent standart weekday between 2000 and 2025. Overall, it is clear that adults who spent their weekday by working and studying dominated in both periods. Additionally, adults who were sleeping was the second largest category through the period. Two categories faced an upward trend, while others […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the percentage of time used for different activities in the office in the US in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts show the distribution of time across six activities in one US office from 1980 to 2000. Overall, phone use, paper documents, and meetings took up the largest amount of time initially, though they all exhibited a considerable fall. Emailing and grapevining, by contrast, followed a rising trajectory, with the latter becoming the […]

Band 9

The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007.

The pie charts illustrate the consumption of water for five different purposes in Sydney, an Australian city between 1997 and 2007. Overall, the charts highlight significant variations in water consumption throughout the period, where the food industry consumed the highest proportion in both years, while the building industry recorded the lowest percentage. In 1997, the […]

Band 8+

The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.

the pie charts illustrate the proportion of produced different mining items in a country in 1985 and 2003. overall, oil was the half of total energy, although experienced shariply decrease, while coal mining showed dramaticly increase notable other renewable and hydro far behind. in 1985, oil was the largest proportion with 52%, making it the […]

Band 4+

The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007.

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of water consumption among five sectors in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007. It is clear that the food industry used the highest proportion water in both years, while the building industry consistently accounted for the lowest share. In 1997, food industry consumed the largest share of water, approximately […]

Band 7+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium