Band 4+: The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the Australia in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The report addresses the main requirements of the task and identifies key trends, such as 'definite jobs' being the primary reason for both groups. However, there are some inaccuracies in how the data is reported and compared. For instance, the report states that 'looking for jobs' was the lowest category for immigrants, whereas the data suggests 'others' or 'accompany/join' might be different depending on the interpretation, and it misidentifies the scale of certain figures. Additionally, some phrasing is slightly awkward or imprecise (e.g., 'the usual things'). To improve, ensure that every data point mentioned is accurately mapped to the correct category and focus on using more precise comparative language to highlight the differences between the two charts. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

The report follows a logical structure with an introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes interrupted by awkward phrasing and imprecise transitions. For instance, the overview uses 'the usual things,' which is too informal for an academic report. To improve, focus on using more precise cohesive devices and ensure that each sentence flows naturally into the next to guide the reader through the comparisons.

The vocabulary is somewhat limited and occasionally used incorrectly. Phrases like 'the main cases of migrations,' 'the usual things,' and 'anchored the bottom of the scale' are either imprecise or informal. There is also some repetitive use of 'definite jobs.' To reach a higher band, aim for a wider range of academic synonyms (e.g., 'primary drivers,' 'reasons for relocation,' 'significant proportion') and ensure that word choices accurately reflect the data being described.

There are several grammatical errors that impact the clarity of the report. Issues include incorrect article usage ('the Australia'), passive voice errors ('were belonged to'), and awkward sentence constructions ('which comprised immigrants'). While there is an attempt to use complex structures, they are often inaccurate. Focus on mastering subject-verb agreement, correct preposition usage, and the proper application of relative clauses to improve accuracy.