The chart below provides information about the way clients assessed various facilities at three well-being centres.
Overall, all of the assessed features’ marks are higher than 4.0 which is already good. Despite this fact, none of the centres got the highest mark of 10. Additionally, it is notably seen that Peveril centre always had the highest outcomes. Nevertheless, its results were closely followed by Marchbank clinic.
To commence with the first part of evaluating criterias, customers at Peveril centre enjoyed booking services and rated it as 9.1 points, while Marchbank’s attendants rated that option by 1.3 points less than Peveril’s result, respectively. Regarding the left enterprise, it got only 5.2 points for that aspect. However, doctors’ service positively affected customers’ opinion. Consequently, the outcomes from that aspect ranged from 8.0 to 8.7, respectively. According to the diagram, patients at Longston clinic did not think that the facility of children’s care was well, as their sentiment accounted for the rate of 6.3. Meanwhile, other two companies got 7.5 and 7.3 for their childcare abilities, respectively.
What is also noteworthy is that pharmacy services were not good within each of the clinic due to the marks ranging from 5.1 to 6.3, respectively. The chart reveals that most customers of Peveril were pleased with the gotten responses to their concerns, and rated that section of the survey with 9.6. Regarding other two companies, their assessed rates were not as high as Peveril’s , accounting for 4.3 and 6.5, respectively. Finally, the average scores were : Longston enterprise – 5.8 , Peveril enterprise – 8.3, and Marchbank’s business – 7.2 , respectively.