The three tables compare the survey results in terms of production quality, information about plays/performances, and facilities in the theater among club members and general public. Overall, the share for opinions about production quality and information about the plays/performances follows completely different figures, while the figure for opinions about facilities experiences a huge gap between club members and general public.
Almost same results are received about production quality among club members and general public. The figure for club members told excellent accounts for 70%, 3-percentage-point higher than that of general public. Satisfactory responses show 17% and 18% in club member and general public, respectively, representing the least disparity among these two groups of people. Lastly, 13% club members share poor opinions, slightly less than that of general public (15%).
Opinions about information given to public about the plays/performance are overall positive. The figure for satisfactory represents 72% among club members, while the figure for general public is a staggering 88%. The share for satisfactory responses among club members is the over the double of general public, with 23%. Similar but more noticeable figures are showed when it comes to poor answers, with respective figures 5% and a mere 2%.
Opinions about facilities in the theater bucked the trend. While 75% club members give excellent to a questionnaire, the figure for general public records 55%. Satisfactory responses experience somewhat comparable figures, 23% and 19%, respectively. By contrast, the share for poor responses was totally different, with respective figures 2% and 26% , making the most noticeable difference between two groups of people.
