The data presents the responses from individuals who completed a questionnaire regarding club membership ideas and general public perceptions about a theater in one town in 2012.
Overall, it can be observed that the proportion of excellent club members peaked at the highest level. Meanwhile, both the quality and facilities of poor club members reached concerning levels. Another interesting point is that the percentage of general excellent club members was notable.
In contrast, when examining the facilities, the satisfaction rates among the general public were not as high as those of club members, with figures of 72% compared to 64%. Regarding community satisfaction, 26% of club members expressed satisfaction, while the general public reported 24%. In terms of poor ratings, club members were four times as popular as the general public, with scores of 2 and 8, respectively. The number of outstanding individuals attending the club was 72, which was significantly higher than the 26% who visited pleasantly.
The superior common community that assisted the club was eight times as fashionable as the satisfied society. If we analyze the information, it shows that the exceptional general public was more successful than the individuals who attended the club. Regarding contented participants, 30% were club members, compared to only 20% from the general public. As for the community with poorer ratings, attendance at the club was reported at 16 compared to the common society’s 14%. The needy club members did not perform as well, with ratings of 54 compared to the marvelous group’s 16. The delighted general society was more popular than the satisfied community.
In examining the details, the quality of excellent club members was busier than that of the general public, with figures of 88% compared to 55%. Furthermore, the attendance of excellent individuals in facilities at the club was lower, with 10% compared to 88% for quality satisfied club members. The fulfilled quality members of the club were rated a quarter higher than those of the general public, with 10 and 40, respectively. Additionally, quality ratings among club members were less favorable compared to the information provided.
