Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a table listing the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries for the years 2003 and 2006, alongside the number of workers per 1,000 people in 2006. In Australia, 2003 saw 162,000 workers rising to 216,000 in 2006, equating to 10.7 per 1,000 people. New Zealand had 65,000 workers in 2003 increasing to 87,000 in 2006, equating to 21.1 per 1,000 people. The United Kingdom witnessed a growth from 137,000 in 2003 to 286,000 in 2006, equating to 4.4 per 1,000 people. The United States had 577,000 workers in 2003 which grew to 678,000 by 2006, equating to 2.3 per 1,000 people.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.
The table provides arranged information about migrant temporary worker in: Australia , New Zealand , United Kingdom , United states, between a period of time accounted as 3 years from 2003 to 2006 and shows the percentages.
Over all from the graph it is clear that emloyers was highest in New Zealand , on the other hand, the lowest one is United States.
According to what is shown, it is noticable that United States has the greatest number of population in both years 2003 and 2006 , but only 2.3% per 1000 people were a workers by 2006,while the vaseversa for New Zealand and Australia which contain very minimal less than Us employers but per 1000 people New Zealand took 21.1% and Australia 10.7%
United Kingdom slight more than United State with a 2.1% propotion while it is 4.4% and Us 2.3% but United Kingdom has very lesser numbers of workers than United States.
Word Count: 154
