It is widely acknowledged that water is an increasingly pivotal issue in the earth. While proponent advocate that free water sourses are essential, opponent believe that it will creat some drawbacks in contemporary society. I strongly content that government should not start complety free water providing scheem. Because it will creat a detrimental pressure on country and people will start abuse of water.
On the one hand, water is essential for humain being, as it considered the alternative of life. Every individuals have a rights in taking fresh water regardles of their financial circumstance. Government should be always conscious not only about availability of water but also the consept of purity. A clear illustration of this can be seen in well developed countres, where fresf water is a common for all. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that pure water is must be ensured by government.
On the other hand, being free availability of eater can contribute in severel detrimental effect. At the very outset people will started use water in any purpuse. They will not consider any possible scarsity of water. As a consequenses society will undergo into a catastrophic atmosphere and water pollution will soaring day by day. At the same, it will place a terrible pressure on relative authority. Taken togather, these consideration reinforce the argument that free water sipply should be restricted.
In conclusion, having considered both perspective, I firmly belive that government can ensure low prise and subsidies for people, who are financially challanged rather that entirely free supply of water. Unless, these issue are addressed effectively the consequences could be far-reaching.