In contemporary society, the necessity of success is often debated, with some attributing that art coursework should not be integrated into the compulsory curriculum, while others argue that art classes should be listed as a dispensable course. My perspective aligns with the latter, acknowledging the importance of art in personal development and career paths.
Advocates for art as an unnecessary subject often hinge their arguments on time-wasting. The rationale behind this viewpoint is that not all students are keen on art, leading to the consumption of valuable time that could be devoted to more practical subjects. As a case in point, a recent research in a relevant area brought to light students may prioritize subjects relevant to college entrance exams over art, viewing it as an obstacle rather than an opportunity for growth.
On the contrary, I support the opposing view, which posits that the art subject can contribute to personal development and career prospects. It is undeniable that the participation of art appreciation plays a vital role in personal growth. For instance, a recent survey conducted by Hong Kong University laid bare that art can foster creativity and problem-solving skills through hands-on practice, enhancing students’ overall skill set. Additionally, it is true that there is a promising career for students who are favor of artistic contents. To deepen this elucidation, as exposed by the most up-to-date government report, in some certain industries such as advertising and publishing, proficiency in artistic skills is increasingly valued, highlighting the relevance of art education in preparing students for future career paths.
In conclusion, I remain unwavering in my conviction that art subject should be listed as a compulsory curriculum. While potential pitfalls lurk in the backdrop, the arguments I have elucidated above robustly vindicate my stance.