It is often argued that some artists should be given the freedom to express their ideas, without government restrictions. Despite some benefits giving free artists, I strongly believe that all artistic works should be controlled by government bodies.
On the one hand, writers are crucial identity in community due to, they can raise local problems in their writings or pictures. In other words, they are using expressions to criticize local issues like awful road structure or public transport system. As a result, they help people to find solution for their problems. Additionally, artists publish books, writings, and drawings, which are helps society to acquire new knowledge, by this people can also enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Having said that, I agree with those who believe that writers should be controlled over government bodies. Firstly, nowadays there are thousands of artists, and if all of them writing about what they want, it would be not good situation. This is because they can influence negatively, by their artistic works to community, by writing and wide spreading fake or unreliable information. As a consequence, people frequently trusting to this and maintain wrong data. For example, one local artist, write about potential disease and recommend people to buy antibiotics, after a huge number of people mass begin purchasing medicine. In the end, it was fake, and all people spend their money for nothing. In my opinion, government should restrict and only give the freedom to write after checking their intelligence and personality.
In conclusion, while there some advantages giving freedom for artists, I believe every time government should control them.