In many job applications, employees are often asked to provide their private life data. Some believe it’s acceptable to provide, however others agree not. So, in this essay we will discuss both point aspects before stating my own opinion.
On the one hand, proponents argue providing personal information helps the company get to know the person better. When providing details like hobbies or marital status reflects the individual’s personality, duties and life circumstances which eventually will help them decide whether he is a good fit for the desired position. For instance, knowing someone’s hobbies and interests will help company decide whether he’s team oriented or has good communication skills. Marital status might indicate a person’s commitment and responsibilities, whether relocation or working extra hours would affect him or his family, especially for jobs that require frequent travelling or working overtime.
On the other hand, critics disagree with this point of view. They believe asking for someone’s personal data is unnecessary and even discriminatory. You cannot judge a person based on his hobbies or interests. This might lead to biased or unconscious judgements. For example, an employer might wrongly assume that a married woman with kids would be less committed compared to a woman who’s single. Also, some candidates feel uncomfortable while providing such information.
In my opinion, while understanding someone’s character is important it should not come on the cost of privacy. People should be assessed on their experience, skills and knowledge. Private data should be shared only if the candidate feels comfortable or if it clearly relates to the job being offered.