Nowadays, there is an open debate on if governments should invest their public funds in the art sector or prioritize public services. While some people believe that the art sector should not be fund by governments, it is clear that this sector is vital to a well developed countrie, since it increases the beauty of the city and the immigration.
Many people believe that the government is supposed to prioritize investments in foundamental services instead of in the art sector. Poponents of this view may suggest that these investments would benefit a wider goup of citizens, so most of the people might benefit from them. They also argue that a more efficient public sector may improve the economy in the long term. For example, if a new hospital is built, it would speed the treatments of illnesses, that in turn would allow emploees to go back to work earlier. It is claimes this cluld increase the work productivity.
On the other hand, investments in the arts have significant advantages. An important reason for this is that public servicis would not be excluded from the government’s budget, but instead, it would be smally reduced to let the art sector to be expanded. These type of investments most of the times improve the beauty of the city, reasing the general happines for the pople that live in it. Furthermore, a good looking city may entice international workers to move here, which would strength significantly the countie’s economy.
In conclusion, although many believe the art sector should not be funded by governments, it is clear that the economy and the cities would benefit from it. Resulting in an increase of the beauty and immigration of the cities.