Some would argue that nation provides many economic aids to the artists because artist itself is a valuable profession while on the other hand, some would says that financial could be better used for supporting resettlement of refugees .However,I believe that the states should help artist too.
Some people believes in centre giving support to the singers and painters because they consider artist as one of the greatest professions in the world. Artist being innovative ,they usually invest a lot of time in studying ancient arts and music that can be either preserve or create a new art out of it.The fact that these people have to devote a huge time in making a new art,they can’t do such kind of job as a part time.Many of the big projects needs large expenses in making and showcasing it to the audiences. I also agree to this idea that government should add to the artists economic to sustain art by considering the amount of time they spend on it.For example, A man in Tibet took 12 years to complete one big mural on the wall of a monastery.
On the other hand, it is thought that there is no reason in spending money on them .Instead, it could be use in some other more significant fields like helping to refugees in improve their living standard. This could assist them in providing better education the health assurance of those who are deprived of it .However, I still believes that artists deserves financial help .For instances, people fleeing to another countries often needs economic aid to resettle in new environment.
In conclusion, Artist as a profession a needs government support to help them grow and sustain. The opinion that it’s is extra unneeded expense is not true.