Leaving countryside has become vacant in rural area. The number of territory around the world, people of village are transparing them to towns ; therefore, the population in the rural area is declining. Although this scenario has beneficial aspect, it seems to me that this is negative improvement as lack of cultivation, countryside who remain stay in rural area suffer for the all thing.
On the one hand, there are ample aspects that people get harmfulsituation. First and foremost, if I talk about cultivation, production rate decrease if people move cities. This is becouse there are plethora of crops land in the countryside which will fall in degradation. People of rural area are skilled in cultivating ;therefore, if they migrate cities, lands are felled in ruinous situation. Second most reason is that, when it comes to the suffering, when people of rural area get any problem that time they are not able to assist from others wing to shortages of individuals in countryside. A case in point — a particular area in India where people tend to move cities. As an outcome, the proportion of rural people in that area declined from around 70% to just less than 40%.
On the other hand,there are countless scenario also in moving cities ;nonetheless, negative development surpass positive aspect.In terms ofsituation of empty in rural area, no one have in rural area to improve in such a situation or overcome as a consequence, they are not able to show this in front of government.
To conclude, inspire of having plethora of benefit to move cities, it has also deleterious for rural area’s people ;hence, from my perspective this scenario has negative improvement.