This essay will outline the reasons for my viewpoint. The practice of attending private “cram schools” for extra coaching in test-taking techniques is a complex issue with both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, cram schools can help students improve their academic performance, especially in competitive educational systems. They provide targeted instructions, practice tests and the strategies that may not be fully covered in regular schools.This can be particularly beneficial for students aiming to get accepted to the top universities or pass complicated and difficult national exams.
However, there are several drawbacks. Firstly, it can create or widen inequality, as only families who can afford these private lessons can give their children this type of advantage. Secondly, it may lead to the excessive presure or burnout, especially for young students who already spent many hours at regular schools. Furthermore, cram schools focus more on rote learning and test taking strategies, rather than fostering creativity, critical thinking or even a genuine interest in learning.
In my opinion, while cram schools can be helpful in certain contexts, relying heavily on them reflects deeper issues in educational systems, such as overemphsasizing on exams and lack of personalized learning in public schools. Another disadvantage of cram schools is that they can reduce time for rest and personal development. Students who attend these schools often sacrifice hobbies, social activities, and sleep in order to study more. This can negatively affect their mental health, emotional well-being, and overall development outside of academics.
Eventually, school systems should be improved and developed extremely, so extra coaching or teaching would be less necessary.