In contemporary societies, massive consumption of fast food causes a serious concern regarding people’s health as to whether allocating higher taxes to these unhealthy foods is a practical approach to address this issue. Although some might favour this solution, I firmly disagree with the proposed assertion and cast doubt on its functionality. In the upcoming essay, I will elaborate on my perspective, providing numerous compelling implications.
First and foremost, none of the imposing approaches, namely increasing taxes, will be effective, as long as the necessary knowledge of fast food’s detriments is the scars. This is due to the fundamental contributors that persuade individuals to prefer junk food over healthy homemade food. To illustrate, the inconsiderable time to order fast food, compared to the overwhelming efforts in the process of preparing a suitable meal is one of the substantial factors of this preference. As a result, if people become aware of the adverse consequences of what they consume, their attitude towards cooking will change. Besides this, accessing prepared food from local stories in markets still remains their priority, even with higher expenses. To support this, infeasibility of this strategy has been demonstrated throughout previous experiences in other areas, such as drugs, in which addicts remain enthusiasm about them, no matter how much they cost.
Furthermore, food factories, ingredient distributors, and local shops with encounter significant challenges by placing the pressure on them, and this situation will eventually impact their staffs as well. To begin with, resturants and food producers have two possible choices; first, to increase food’s expenses that affects people’s financial status while possesses an excessive burden, as described, and second, to purchase low-quality ingredients to address their shortage in funds. In both cases, customers’ economic or health is being targeted. Additionally, food factories might decide downsizing to manage their limited finance. Thus, none of these will principally fulfill the initial aim. Instead, I suggest a combinational solution, including spreading the essential information among people, particularly youngsters, and placing controlling rules on the quality of foods in markets.
In conclusion, while some might consider rising taxes the most effective way to handle the prevalence of fast food’s consumption, I strongly disapprove of this claim, as it does not address this issue and can potentially exacerbate economic circumstances.