There has been growing trend among certain individuals that nowadays women do not have a requirement of being married due to ability to eke a living on their own. On the other hand, there is no needance in financial security which can be provided by marriage. From my perspective, the main aspect of decreasing tendency of married state is own earnings.
In my view, women have almost equal opportunities to provide for the family instead of doing senseless households or bringing children up. This development made female population independent from someone in financial case. For instance, in ancient times around 30-35% of hunters were females, and so far, they have managed to keep the house clean and nurture kids. This fact contributed to reduction in the role of men in families, influencing to autonomy of womenfolk.
Despite my own belief, the idea of unnecessity pecuniary safety is spreading among separate group of people. I consider that marriage is still required for humans, despite of their independence. Having such unequal and unstable conditions, wedlock ensure support. For example, if your business crashes down, patner’s assistance will be indispensible and will garantee the lack of money problems. Some contries provide special perks and benefits for married couples what makes ensuring life a bit easier, especially for young people. For example, you will never become homeless, contributing to your life due to special perks and loans for family couples, such as low interest rates on the loan for real estate.
In conclusion, the concept of the lack of need in the matrimony bases on two directions: women’s own livelihood and capability to secure the material provision.