The health and education sectors should aim to provide every person with the best services. Due to the policy in several states, the government to some extent subsidizes the healthcare and education expenses of their citizens, unlike individual paid services in some countries. In this essay, I will discuss the positive
and negative aspects of this situation and put forward why its upsides outweigh. One of the primary merits of free healthcare and training system is that it allows especially people living below the poverty line to benefit from these opportunities. Regardless of the economic situation of families, all people should be able to receive medical treatment and have the right to be educated. For instance, I witnessed the life story of a family on a tight budget and their four children living in a country that adopted the mentioned policy. Thanks to the financial resources provided by the state, the family was able to take their children to the hospital when they became ill. Furthermore, getting a degree succesfully as a result of costless education, the children even experienced the pride of having a profession. Another positive aspect is that it enables newly graduated doctors to be recruited faster as a consequence of the increasing number of cases owing to the unpaid healthcare services. Therefore, it contributes a lot to the professional development of doctors as the experience they gain will rise. With regard to education system, unlimited and collective training at schools causes the literacy rate of the country to rise, which is
an indication of a country’s welfare level. Turning to the other side of the argument, the fact that taking private services from these sectors increases the rate of correct diagnosis in the treatment of patients, and that of determining the students’ deficiencies in the course subjects. Moreover, it has a positive impact on the quality of the service provided or the interest shown. In other words, at private hospitals, the number of patients per doctor is lower than at public hospitals, which allows a doctor to spend more time for the patients in need and further benefit them. On the other hand, since students studying at private schools or taking private lessons receive one- on-one support, this may make a major contribution to their improvement. To illustrate, an international
study asserts that paid services in the fields of health and education satisfy citizens more. All things considered, we should weigh up the pros of helping out people hardly making ends meet and increasing the recruitment of doctors as well as literacy rate, and the cons of eliminating the abuse of free public services. Personally, I am of the opinion that the strenghts of government-subsidised healtcare and education system are eventually superior to any possible downsides. Education and health are two basic
needs of every citizen in our lives, that’s why no citizen can be deprived of them.