Nowadays the public transports like bus and metro are imposed by the government while people who want to own vehicle face several barriers against private transport ownership. I consider that advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
In the world, the urbanization increases in day by day. As a result, the most bug cities face the transport issues like traffic jams and parking. The government realized this begin to set new laws to settle them. The one main method is found as a public transport. A lot of cities which launched buses have a fewer traffic jams than others. Also public transport has several advantages for citizens. Firstly, the buses and metros are more cheaper than owning a private car and it doesn’t matter of time or weather. For example, in winter days, the surface of roads is covered with snow and ice. As a consequence, driving car is more danger. But as i mentioned, buses can do their function. Secondly, they act according to schedule. It leads to build up systematic actions. This can help you to organise you plan accordingly and go anywhere on time.
On the other hand, this policy poses some problems like breaking human rights. Becouse every person owns rights which provide of freedom. In the opinion of it, people can buy anything which they want and owned anything and also use them in anywhere. On the this side, the policy which is against private vehicle ownership is wrong. Becouse some people like getting some diseases can not use the public transpor. For instance, my cousin should not use public transport due to having one disease which is related to his legs. So that, he always is tend to private car.
In conclusuon, although the develpoment of public transport is good way opposed a lot of problems in cities, the government consider that the second side of it and create more flexible and provided freedom system.