Completely replacing printed books with online reading sounds neat on paper, like most ideas that ignore how humans actually behave in real life. I partially disagree with the statement.
On the one hand, digital reading is becoming increasingly dominant because it is convenient and often cheaper. First, people can access an enormous range of materials instantly on phones or laptops. This saves time and removes the need to visit libraries or bookshops, which makes reading more flexible in busy modern life. For example, students preparing for exams can quickly download articles and textbooks instead of buying expensive printed copies. As a result, online resources clearly support learning efficiency and broaden access to information, especially for people in remote areas.
On the other hand, printed books are unlikely to disappear because they offer a different and more focused reading experience. First, physical books help readers concentrate better since they are free from distractions such as notifications and ads. This improves comprehension and allows deeper engagement with the text. Second, many people still value the sensory experience of holding a book and collecting them as personal items. For instance, readers often report better memory retention when studying from paper rather than screens. As a result, printed books continue to hold educational and emotional value despite digital growth.
In conclusion, although online reading is undeniably convenient and cost-effective, it is unrealistic to think printed books will vanish. Both forms serve different needs, and for now, they seem stuck coexisting rather than replacing each other.