The discussion centers around whether the government should spend resources to train Olympic athletes or invest in activities that promote the exercise in society. There are divided opinios, while someone believe that is important athletes support because they are representing the nation and motivating people, others believe that is crucial spend money on programmes that help people with work out.
Firstly, the athletes are figures that promote the physic activities in numerous ways, such as running, swimming, gymnastics, playing basketball, and others. Athletes are who encourage people to remainted healthy. When the government support these people it is helping them achieve their dreams of competing with foreign athletes and promoting culture exchange, at the same time that represented their nation and their passion for doing exercise. Anna Lago is excellent gymnast that promote her sport when she competed on Olympics games, her talent and dedication have led her to win several medals when she represents her country.
In contrast, whether government help more training activities and invest resources in asosiations or programmes that promote sports, people may be more motivated for doing physic activity, however, the decision is up to the people. If they want to change their habits, they will go to the gym or run in the park. Somethings, they do not take advantage with the resources that they have. For example, in the parks there are different devices for phyisical activity, such as stationaty bicycles, etc., nevertheless, people never used them.
In conclusion, when government afford athletes is a way to promote the physical activities and cultural exchange with others. Although the government need to support society with resources to they can do sport, some times should have a balance between both Olympic and society in general.