If a country hosts an international sports event, this will definitely requires a lot of money. According to some people’s opinion , this is a waste of money, whereas other people consider it is not. There are some reasons to this debate and i agree with the latter view.
On the other hand, people who think that events like the Olympic Games or The World Cup are needed to spend a lot money and these people are against to spending money to these events. They would prefer allocating money by government to health of the local people or the road infrastructure,thus , leading to make life better and the feeling of satisfaction. Citizens living in better conditions would opt for staying here and helping the country’s economy. If government spends money on the people’s well-being, these people will potentially contribute to the future of the country by working. As for the road infrastructure, people using private cars or public transport do not satisfy with condition of their roads in some countries , thus causing traffic or accidental problems. So these people might want money to be spent on crucial issues than events.
However, it is of great importance of being a host though requiring a lot of money. Firstly, it gives recognition to this country if it is an international event. More people will know about yhis country and visit there, resulting more reputation by people. As for economical perspectives, if the majority of people visit a host country, it will definitely give more money to the countries’ income. As a result, government can spend money on other problems in its country.
In conclusion, there are negative sides of this debate, it confers obvious advantages, and i believe that it is more beneficial to be a host in an international event to both countries nad their citizens in equal measures.