The debate about whether the Olympic Games and Football World Cup are a waste of money or a contributing factor for the country has sparked significant debate. A group of people believe that these events are not crucial enough for allocating the budget. Others consider that these games can be advantageous for the popularity of the country.
On the one hand, there could be a myriad of reasons why people contemplate that these Olympiads do not play an important role. To begin with, these games require a marked amount of money, such as choosing stadiums and providing participants with necessary clothes, and drugs. For example, countries generally endeavor to find the most equipped places, and they allocate a budget for renovations. Another reason worth considering is that authorities invest in accommodations, flights, meals, and trips which demand an essential amount of funding. According to an article published in “The Scientist,” a leading national newspaper in London, studies have shown that all of these facilities demand a strong budget not only for a superior Olympiad but also for satisfaction rates.
On the other hand, some might guess that what makes these games vital might be a representation of heritage, monuments, and present cultural identity. For instance, when the participants and visitors came to the country, they would travel to historical places, and observe cultural identities. What is more, these games promote countries’ popularity, and demonstrate it to the whole world. Recent survey results have presented that when a country becomes a host for international games, it witness improvements in the tourism industry in the next years.
Taking everything into account, although views differ on whether the Olympic games and the Football World Cup are only a waste of money or a compulsory action for the country, I firmly believe that the bringing of these games can not be underestimated. Hence, being a host for these events not only makes the country widespread but also a tourism center.