Nowadays, around the globe, it is often debated that people who have been punished in prison and redeemed themselves are the most suitable educators for adolescents about the dire consequences of committing crimes. However, in my humble opinion, I am in disagreement with this idea for a multitude of reasons that will be elaborated further in this essay.
Former offenders are generally assumed to have seen and experienced the danger of illegal activities firsthand, thus giving them knowledge so they do not re-offend in the future. Because they have had experiences and knows the ins and outs of unlawful actions, they can transfer their wisdom to the younger generations. It also warns teenagers about the aftermath of crimes so that they do not go on the same path as former criminals. Despite that, there are better alternatives to this particular case, and one of them is the people who work for the laws themselves, which are police officers.
Most of the time, police officers are known to abide by the laws best; they have an extensive knowledge of rules in society, as well as the penalties for those who cross the line. Due to the fact that police officers are servants of the laws that hold the world together, they are undoubtedly the best candidates to teach children about the punishments they will face should they commit a crime that is either light or serious. For that reason, workers of the laws are deemed to be the most suitable educators for teenagers to avoid engaging in illegal activities.
All in all, people who have served their sentences in prison are knowledgeable, but not as well as those whose profession is directly related to the laws. This is why I disagree with the aforementioned idea of past offenders being the best people to teach adolescents about the consequences of committing crimes.