It is sometimes argued that to learn distinguishing good from bad to children as a primary need, penalizing is crucial. I completely agree with this point of view, because punishing is the main way of confrontation with the consequences of an act. However, I believe, punishment should not be physically or psychologically harmful.
To distinguish concepts of good and evil for children at an early age without utilizing penalties as an effective tool is impossible. It can help make kids familiar with the meaning of the consequences of actions and guide them to understand the limits of the real world and how to behave in society. For example, when a little boy starts to bully friends, keeping him away for a period as a punishment can teach him a valuable lesson to stop misbehavior. Additionally, punishment is always perceived as a negative experience in an individual’s life; therefore, trying not to impose fines can help children develop a positive personality and comprehend the values of being good.
I believe that the disadvantages of physical and psychological punishment outweigh the advantages. Firstly, physical chastisement can cause permanent bodily injury. Secondly, penalizing a child physically or psychologically may lead to serious mental harm, from which recovery may not be possible. Finally, these kinds of penalties may also make some children rebellious or change their personalities to a weaker state. For instance, my niece grew up with lasting claustrophobia because of childhood punishment.
In conclusion, while I firmly believe that punishment should not inflict physical or psychological harm, I would argue that the practical method of addressing the consequences of an action is punishment.