Some people believe that prohibiting airplanes is the most effective way of reducing air pollution. I hold a different perspective and I would argue that not limiting airplanes has a lot of benefits.
I think that not limiting airplanes is better than prohibiting aircraft because limiting aircraft can cause the economy to go down. After nineteen covid , travel by plane has become more and more popular which helps the economy grow and help local people make a living. If the government prohibits it, it could lead to the high rate of unemployment in the society. Another point to discuss is that air pollution not only from planes but also from other transport. When planes go around the world , it just releases two percent carbon dioxide. However, other transport such as cars, motorbikes, … .release the amount of carbon dioxide which is the main point that leads to air pollution.
There are some alternatives that can be taken to address that problem. First of all, we can also use another fuel which is eco-friendly and sustainable instead of using fossil fuel. For example, some airlines in Malaysia have an experiment where they use renewable waste and raw materials such as animal fat waste then transfer them into fuel. Another way is that some airlines can limit the number of flights per day. For instance, some airlines usually have ten flights per day, they can decline the flights to six flights then they can upload the information about the flights today for the customers. In addition, in the flights , the flight attendant can raise awareness the customers of the airplane’s impact on the environment and make the customers know more and also sympathy.
In conclusion, i disagree with that idea above, as i believe prohibit aircraft is not the best way.
