Addition of high level sucrose into the varieties of food stuff leads to number of health issues. Hiking the valuation of the syrup products motivates an individual for cutting off the glucose concentration. For this, I totally disagree with an idea as it leads to food insecurity for the low margin citizen.
The inclination in the cost of the above mentioned product result in the incapability among less income generating family to purchase the food item. Above going money of the available consumable syrup items creates a bar between higher and lower economic status individual. Access to food is equal right of every citizen, the hiking amount deprives some group of community from getting the confectioneries. For instance, increasing the price will only deprive some citizen from the purchase, whilst the high income generating group will still be able to buy it.
Buying of the available carbohydrate foodie stuff by any of the group still hold a higher chance of less well-being of a person. For this, making every family well known about the negative health impact by the ingestion of the given substance plays a vital role. Encouraging every citizen for this will create a equality among the two group of society, at a same time meet the goal. For example, a food company near Pokhara produce a good which posses a little health risk when consume in high quantity. For this, the organization has labeled a message on its packaging about the possible side effect. This ensure the wise use of product along with less health issue.
To conclude, though the hiking price of the sugar food and soft drink may help to prevent illness to so extent. But, more than this, motivating every citizen for less consumption of these product will play a effective part.